Flood risk mapping and analysis using an integrated framework of machine learning models and analytic hierarchy process

被引:8
|
作者
Quynh Duy Bui [1 ]
Chinh Luu [2 ]
Sy Hung Mai [2 ]
Hang Thi Ha [3 ]
Huong Thu Ta [4 ]
Binh Thai Pham [5 ]
机构
[1] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Fac Bridges & Rd, Hanoi 100000, Vietnam
[2] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Fac Hydraul Engn, Hanoi, Vietnam
[3] Hanoi Univ Civil Engn, Inst Geodesy Engn Technol, Hanoi, Vietnam
[4] VietNam Acad Water Resources, Ctr Water Resources Software, Hanoi, Vietnam
[5] Univ Transport Technol, Geotech Engn Div, Hanoi, Vietnam
关键词
Flood risk map; flood susceptibility; machine learning; AHP; Vietnam; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING; SUSCEPTIBILITY; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; TREES; CLASSIFICATION; VULNERABILITY; REGRESSION; HAZARD; PART;
D O I
10.1111/risa.14018
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In this study, a new approach of machine learning (ML) models integrated with the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method was proposed to develop a holistic flood risk assessment map. Flood susceptibility maps were created using ML techniques. AHP was utilized to combine flood vulnerability and exposure criteria. We selected Quang Binh province of Vietnam as a case study and collected available data, including 696 flooding locations of historical flooding events in 2007, 2010, 2016, and 2020; and flood influencing factors of elevation, slope, curvature, flow direction, flow accumulation, distance from river, river density, land cover, geology, and rainfall. These data were used to construct training and testing datasets. The susceptibility models were validated and compared using statistical techniques. An integrated flood risk assessment framework was proposed to incorporate flood hazard (flood susceptibility), flood exposure (distance from river, land use, population density, and rainfall), and flood vulnerability (poverty rate, number of freshwater stations, road density, number of schools, and healthcare facilities). Model validation suggested that deep learning has the best performance of AUC = 0.984 compared with other ensemble models of MultiBoostAB Ensemble (0.958), Random SubSpace Ensemble (0.962), and credal decision tree (AUC = 0.918). The final flood risk map shows 5075 ha (0.63%) in extremely high risk, 47,955 ha (5.95%) in high-risk, 40,460 ha (5.02%) in medium risk, 431,908 ha (53.55%) in low risk areas, and 281,127 ha (34.86%) in very low risk. The present study highlights that the integration of ML models and AHP is a promising framework for mapping flood risks in flood-prone areas.
引用
收藏
页码:1478 / 1495
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Flood hazard mapping and assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and GIS techniques in Takelsa, Northeast Tunisia
    Dhekra Souissi
    Ali Souie
    Abdelaziz Sebei
    Rabeb Mahfoudhi
    Adel Zghibi
    Lahcen Zouhri
    Walid Amiri
    Mohamed Ghanmi
    [J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2022, 15 (16)
  • [22] Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework for quantifying the flood resilience of housing infrastructure systems
    Sen, Mrinal Kanti
    Dutta, Subhrajit
    Kabir, Golam
    Laskar, Shamim Ahmed
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2022, 49 (06) : 980 - 992
  • [23] PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT USING THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    MUSTAFA, MA
    ALBAHAR, JF
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1991, 38 (01) : 46 - 52
  • [24] Assessment of flash flood risk based on improved analytic hierarchy process method and integrated maximum likelihood clustering algorithm
    Lin, Kairong
    Chen, Haiyan
    Xu, Chong-Yu
    Yan, Ping
    Lan, Tian
    Liu, Zhiyong
    Dong, Chunyu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 584
  • [25] A Risk Assessment Framework for Critical Infrastructure Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Fioravanti, C.
    Guarino, S.
    Mazza, B.
    Nobili, M.
    Santucci, F.
    Ansaldi, S. M.
    [J]. IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2022, 55 (40): : 277 - 282
  • [26] Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping
    Prasad, Pankaj
    Loveson, Victor Joseph
    Das, Bappa
    Kotha, Mahender
    [J]. GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (16) : 4571 - 4593
  • [27] Pipeline Defects Risk Assessment Using Machine Learning and Analytical Hierarchy Process
    Ouadah, Abdelaziz
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SMART SYSTEMS (ICASS), 2018,
  • [28] Enhanced machine learning models development for flash flood mapping using geospatial data
    Hasnaoui, Yacine
    Tachi, Salah Eddine
    Bouguerra, Hamza
    Benmamar, Saadia
    Gilja, Gordon
    Szczepanek, Robert
    Navarro-Pedreno, Jose
    Yaseen, Zaher Mundher
    [J]. EURO-MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL FOR ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRATION, 2024, 9 (03) : 1087 - 1107
  • [29] Mapping the transmission risk of Zika virus using machine learning models
    Jiang, Dong
    Hao, Mengmeng
    Ding, Fangyu
    Fu, Jingying
    Li, Meng
    [J]. ACTA TROPICA, 2018, 185 : 391 - 399
  • [30] Flood risk mapping for the lower Narmada basin in India: a machine learning and IoT-based framework
    Mangukiya, Nikunj K.
    Sharma, Ashutosh
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2022, 113 (02) : 1285 - 1304