Computational Thinking for Science: Positioning coding as a tool for doing science

被引:2
|
作者
Krakowski, Ari [1 ,2 ]
Greenwald, Eric [1 ]
Roman, Natalie [1 ]
Morales, Christina [1 ]
Loper, Suzanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Hall Sci, Berkeley, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Hall Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
computational thinking; curriculum development; equity; interdisciplinary; problem-based learning; science education; SELF-EFFICACY; BUY-IN; SCHOOL SCIENCE; STUDENTS; BELIEFS; MATHEMATICS; CONCEPTIONS; EXPERIENCES; STEM;
D O I
10.1002/tea.21907
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The role of computation in science is ever-expanding and is enabling scientists to investigate complex phenomena in more powerful ways and tackle previously intractable problems. The growing role of computation has prompted calls to integrate computational thinking (CT) into science instruction in order to more authentically mirror contemporary science practice and to support inclusive engagement in science pathways. In this multimethods study, we present evidence for the Computational Thinking for Science (CT+S) instructional model designed to support broader participation in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways by (1) providing opportunities for students to learn CT within the regular school day, in core science classrooms; and (2) by reframing coding as a tool for developing solutions to compelling real-world problems. We present core pedagogical strategies employed in the CT+S instructional model and describe its implementation into two 10-lesson instructional units for middle-school science classrooms. In the first unit, students create computational models of a coral reef ecosystem. In the second unit, students write code to create, analyze, and interpret data visualizations using a large air quality dataset from the United States Environmental Protection Agency to understand, communicate, and evaluate solutions for air quality concerns. In our investigation of the model's implementation through these two units, we found that participating students demonstrated statistically significant advancements in CT, competency beliefs for computation in STEM, and value assigned to computation in STEM. We also examine evidence for how the CT+S model's core pedagogical strategies may be contributing to observed outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings and propose a testable theory of action for the model that can serve future researchers, evaluators, educators, and instructional designers.
引用
收藏
页码:1574 / 1608
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Coding Science Internships: Broadening Participation in Computer Science by Positioning Coding as a Tool for Doing Science
    Greenwald, Eric
    Krakowski, Ari
    SIGCSE 2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 51ST ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, : 1336 - 1336
  • [2] Computational Thinking in Science
    Denning, Peter J.
    AMERICAN SCIENTIST, 2017, 105 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [3] Computational Thinking in the Science Classroom
    Swanson, Hillary
    Anton, Gabriella
    Bain, Connor
    Horn, Michael
    Wilensky, Uri
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTATIONAL THINKING EDUCATION (CTE 2017), 2017, : 17 - 22
  • [4] DOING IN THINKING. THINKING IN DOING: TOWARDS ANOTHER SCIENCE AS TERRITORIALITY OF PEOPLES
    Weir, Jose Angel Quintero
    GEOGRAPHIA-UFF, 2024, 26 (57):
  • [5] Computational Thinking for Science Positions Youth to Be Better Science Learners
    Cannady, Matthew A.
    Collins, Melissa A.
    Hurt, Timothy
    Montgomery, Ryan
    Greenwald, Eric
    Dorph, Rena
    EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [6] Computational Thinking in Life Science Education
    Rubinstein, Amir
    Chor, Benny
    PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 10 (11)
  • [7] Bringing Computational Thinking into Science Education
    Park, Young-Shin
    Green, James
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN EARTH SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2019, 40 (04): : 340 - 352
  • [8] Thinking spatially in computational social science
    Akbaritabar, Aliakbar
    EPJ DATA SCIENCE, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [9] Computational Thinking in the Era of Data Science
    Mike, Koby
    Ragonis, Noa
    Rosenberg-Kima, Rinat B.
    Hazzan, Orit
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2022, 65 (08) : 33 - 35
  • [10] LANGUAGE AS A TOOL OF EXACT THINKING IN SCIENCE
    Kvasz, Ladislav
    FILOZOFIA, 2022, 77 (10): : 770 - 790