The Boredom Prone Personality: A Multitrait-Multimethod Approach

被引:2
|
作者
Fultz, Amber A. [1 ]
Brown, Jill A. [1 ]
Bernieri, Frank J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon State Univ, 2950 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 USA
关键词
INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; SELF-REPORT; MINDFULNESS; SCALE; VALIDATION; FACETS; CONSEQUENCES; PERCEPTION; ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2022.2112205
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The present investigation reports the convergent and discriminant validity coefficients for two versions of Farmer and Sundberg's (Journal of Personality Assessment, 50(1), 4-17, 1986) boredom proneness scale. Boredom proneness, a trait that refers to an enduring tendency to disengage from the environment, has been neglected by the field of psychology despite its theoretical relevance to performance and psychological well-being. This report sought: (a) to validate a shortened 8-item version of the original Boredom Proneness Scale published by Struk et al. (Assessment, 24(3), 346-359, 2017) and (b) to extensively examine the boredom proneness construct that the long and short versions of this scale assess. We employed a multitrait-multimethod approach that assessed a large number of theorized effects simultaneously. We replicated dozens of theorized and/or previously observed boredom proneness correlates (convergent validity) as well as many theorized null effects (discriminant validity). The overall pattern of significant and null effect sizes provided compelling evidence that the original boredom proneness scale as well as the 8 items that constitute the shorter version are valid measures of one's susceptibility to boredom. We propose that boredom proneness might be an underappreciated yet important theoretical moderator of Person X Situation effects.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 395
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Big Five personality factors and the prediction of behavior: A multitrait-multimethod approach
    Hong, Ryan Y.
    Paunonen, Sampo V.
    Slade, Heather P.
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 45 (02) : 160 - 166
  • [2] The multitrait-multimethod approach to evaluate measurement instruments
    Maassen, GH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 1998, 10 (03) : 277 - 278
  • [3] RELIABILITY OF CLINICIANS JUDGMENTS - MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD APPROACH
    GOLDBERG, LR
    WERTS, CE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING PSYCHOLOGY, 1966, 30 (03): : 199 - 206
  • [4] THEORETICAL AND OBSERVED VARIABLES - THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD APPROACH
    BACHER, F
    [J]. REVUE DE PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE, 1986, 36 (04): : 469 - 490
  • [5] NOTE ON THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX
    HUMPHREYS, LG
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1960, 57 (01) : 86 - 88
  • [6] A Multilevel Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis
    Maas, Cora J. M.
    Lensvelt-Mulders, Gerty J. L. M.
    Hox, Joop J.
    [J]. METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2009, 5 (03) : 72 - 77
  • [7] ANALYZING MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX
    HUBERT, LJ
    BAKER, FB
    [J]. MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 1978, 13 (02) : 163 - 179
  • [8] Multitrait-multimethod change modelling
    Geiser, Christian
    Eid, Michael
    Nussbeck, Fridtjof W.
    Courvoisier, Delphine S.
    Cole, David A.
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2010, 94 (02) : 185 - 201
  • [9] Personality disorder in university students: A multitrait-multimethod matrix study
    Sinha, BK
    Watson, DC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2001, 15 (03) : 235 - 244
  • [10] Disentangling Task and Contextual Performance A Multitrait-Multimethod Approach
    Demerouti, Evangelia
    Xanthopoulou, Despina
    Tsaousis, Ioannis
    Bakker, Arnold B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 13 (02) : 59 - 69