Exploring the predictive value of combined ultrasound parameters for spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in cesarean section: a prospective observational study

BackgroundProphylactic vasopressor infusion can effectively assist with fluid loading to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. However, the ideal dose varies widely among individuals. We hypothesized that hypotension-susceptible patients requiring cesarean section (C-section) could be identified using combined ultrasound parameters to enable differentiated prophylactic medical interventions.MethodsThis prospective observational trial was carried out within a regional center hospital for women and children in Sichuan Province, China. Singleton pregnant women undergoing combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for elective C-sections were eligible. Women with contraindications to spinal anesthesia or medical comorbidities were excluded. Velocity time integral (VTI) and left ventricular end-diastolic area (LVEDA) in the supine and left lateral positions were measured on ultrasound before anesthesia. Stroke volume, cardiac output, and the percentage change (%) in each parameter between two positions were calculated. Vital signs and demographic data were recorded. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was defined as a mean arterial pressure decrease of > 20% from baseline. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to analyze the associations of ultrasound measurements, vital signs, and demographic characteristics with spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension. This exploratory study did not have a predefined outcome; however, various parameter combinations were compared using the AUROC to determine which combined parameters had better predictive values.ResultsPatients were divided into the normotension (n = 31) and hypotension groups (n = 57). A combination of heart rate (HR), LVEDA(s), and VTI% was significantly better at predicting hypotension than was HR (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.707, P = 0.020) or LVEDA(s) (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.711, P = 0.039) alone, but not significantly better than VTI% alone (AUROC 0.827 vs. 0.766, P = 0.098).ConclusionThe combined parameters of HR and LVEDA(s) with VTI% may predict spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension more precisely than the single parameters. Future research is necessary to determine whether this knowledge improves maternal and neonatal outcomes.