Machine Learning-Based Risk Model for Pipeline Integrity Management

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Xiaoyue [1 ]
Tao, Chengcheng [1 ]
Huang, Ying [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Construct Management Technol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Fargo, ND USA
关键词
LINEAR-REGRESSION; OIL; SELECTION; FAILURE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The United States maintains about 2 million miles of natural gas pipelines, among which 321,000 miles are oil and gas transmission and gathering pipelines. Most cast-iron pipelines have been in service for more than 100 years. Pipeline failure caused by aging, corrosion, cracks, and damages may result in irreparable societal, economic, and environmental consequences. In this paper, we develop a machine learning-based risk model to predict the failure of pipelines. We train and test the risk model based on the historical data from a report covering 50 years of spillage data in European cross-country oil pipelines. Various factors such as service type, pipeline age, and leak detection are considered in the model. The machine learning-based risk model will provide the pipeline operators with an efficient and effective way to predict the pipeline failure type and guide the pipeline rehabilitation and maintenance procedures. The risk model can also be used to support risk assessment based on the ASME code for pipeline integrity management, help extend the service life of the pipeline, and bring benefits to the environment and the economy.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 696
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ImmuneMirror: A machine learning-based integrative pipeline and web server for neoantigen prediction
    Chuwdhury, Gulam Sarwar
    Guo, Yunshan
    Chiang, Chi-Leung
    Lam, Ka-On
    Kam, Ngar-Woon
    Liu, Zhonghua
    Dai, Wei
    [J]. BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 25 (02)
  • [32] A Machine Learning-based Pipeline for the Classification of CTX-M in Metagenomics Samples
    Ceballos, Diego
    Lopez-Alvarez, Diana
    Isaza, Gustavo
    Tabares-Soto, Reinel
    Orozco-Arias, Simon
    Ferrin, Carlos D.
    [J]. PROCESSES, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [33] Machine learning-based risk prediction model for cardiovascular disease using a hybrid dataset
    Kanagarathinam, Karthick
    Sankaran, Durairaj
    Manikandan, R.
    [J]. DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2022, 140
  • [34] Machine learning-based construction of a miRNAs prognostic risk assessment model of cervical cancer
    Li, Liang
    Guo, Ling
    Zhang, Yada
    Su, Yongqi
    [J]. 2022 41ST CHINESE CONTROL CONFERENCE (CCC), 2022, : 5723 - 5728
  • [35] Development of a machine learning-based risk model for postoperative complications of lung cancer surgery
    Kadomatsu, Yuka
    Emoto, Ryo
    Kubo, Yoko
    Nakanishi, Keita
    Ueno, Harushi
    Kato, Taketo
    Nakamura, Shota
    Mizuno, Tetsuya
    Matsui, Shigeyuki
    Chen-Yoshikawa, Toyofumi Fengshi
    [J]. SURGERY TODAY, 2024,
  • [36] Developing a machine learning-based flood risk prediction model for the Indus Basin in Pakistan
    Khan, Mehran
    Khan, Afed Ullah
    Ullah, Basir
    Khan, Sunaid
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 19 (06) : 2213 - 2225
  • [37] Learning nodes: machine learning-based energy and data management strategy
    Kim, Yunmin
    Lee, Tae-Jin
    [J]. EURASIP JOURNAL ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS AND NETWORKING, 2021, 2021 (01)
  • [38] Learning nodes: machine learning-based energy and data management strategy
    Yunmin Kim
    Tae-Jin Lee
    [J]. EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking, 2021
  • [39] Machine Learning-Based Recommendation Trust Model for Machine-to-Machine Communication
    Eziama, Elvin
    Jaimes, Luz M. S.
    James, Agajo
    Nwizege, Kenneth Sorle
    Balador, Ali
    Tepe, Kemal
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SIGNAL PROCESSING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ISSPIT), 2018,
  • [40] On the interpretability of machine learning-based model for predicting hypertension
    Elshawi, Radwa
    Al-Mallah, Mouaz H.
    Sakr, Sherif
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2019, 19 (1)