Visual impact assessment of renewable energy developments with the application of multi-criteria decision-making method

被引:3
|
作者
Darabi, Sepida [1 ]
Monavari, Seyed Masoud [1 ]
Jozi, Seyed Ali [2 ]
Rahimi, Raziyeh [1 ]
Vafaeinejad, Alireza [3 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Fac Nat Resources & Environm, Dept Environm Sci, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Environm, North Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ, Fac Civil Water & Environm Engn, Tehran, Iran
关键词
Tourism landscape; Viewshed analysis; Visibility; Visual impact; Wind farm; WIND TURBINES; LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT; GIS; PREDICTION; DESIGN; AREAS; TOOL;
D O I
10.1007/s10668-022-02209-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The large scale of wind projects and wind turbines' height result in a high level of visibility in the surrounding environment. Urban environments and tourism landscapes are visually sensitive viewpoints with sensitive receptors that need accurate visual impact assessments for the prediction of new projects' effects on the existing landscape settings. In this study, distance, visibility, receptors sensitivity and view percentage that are four important criteria of visual impact have been used for impact assessment of Manjil wind farm's visual effect in the urban environment and tourist destinations of Manjil City in Gilan Province of Iran. The main asset of this study is applying the multi-criteria decision-making method and also using the receptor sensitivity factor which helps to the detection of the most fragile areas based on the sensitivity of the potential significant observers and prepares the possibility of calculating a more accurate extent of the affected areas according to the impact magnitude. Significant viewpoints were determined based on the land use maps and field study and the calculated visibility and view percentage of the points combined by interpolation methods to prepare criteria layers. Receptor sensitivity map developed with classifying the land use data according to the observers' sensitivity. The multi-criteria decision-making method and determined weights were used to calculate the visual impact magnitude. Significant viewpoints of the tourist destinations and buildings of the study area were affected by the high visual impact. Comparison of the calculated results from utilized techniques shows 84.73% similarity.
引用
收藏
页码:4437 / 4451
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Multi-criteria decision-making methods: application in humanitarian operations
    Nain, Aniruddh
    Jain, Deepika
    Trivedi, Ashish
    [J]. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (06) : 2090 - 2128
  • [32] Application of Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for the Area of Recycling
    Mikusova, Nikoleta
    Stopka, Ondrej
    Stopkova, Maria
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2019, 8 (03): : 827 - 835
  • [33] Energy Security Assessment Based on a New Dynamic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Framework
    Ziemba, Pawel
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (24)
  • [34] APPLICATION OF MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING APPROACH FOR SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT OF CHOSEN PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES
    Krysiak, Magdalena
    Kluczek, Aldona
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2020, 11 (03) : 106 - 118
  • [35] THE MOMENT INTEGRATED SOLUTION METHOD IN MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    Akan, Ercan
    Bayar, Sibel
    Elmas, Guldem
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2020, 27 (06): : 844 - 866
  • [36] APPLICATIONS OF WASPAS METHOD AS A MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING TOOL
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    [J]. ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2015, 49 (01): : 5 - 22
  • [37] Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2015, 53 : 49 - 57
  • [38] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Mladenovic-Ranisavljevic, Ivana I.
    Takic, Lj.
    Nikolic, D.
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 32 (07) : 2261 - 2276
  • [39] Water Quality Assessment Based on Combined Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method with Index Method
    Ivana I. Mladenović-Ranisavljević
    Lj. Takić
    Đ. Nikolić
    [J]. Water Resources Management, 2018, 32 : 2261 - 2276
  • [40] Assessment of TEOG Examination Success: Topsis Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method Practice
    Kazan, Halim
    Karaman, Engin
    Akcali, Burcay Yasar
    Sismanoglu, Elcin
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2015, : 915 - 924