A Cybernetic Perspective on Generative AI in Education: From Transmission to Coordination

被引:1
|
作者
Griffiths, Dai [1 ]
Frias-Martinez, Enrique [1 ]
Tlili, Ahmed [2 ]
Burgos, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Int La Rioja UNIR, Res Inst Innovat & Technol Educ UNIR iTED, La Rioja, Spain
[2] Beijing Normal Univ BNU, Smart Learning Inst SLI, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Education; Cybernetics; Generative AI; Human-Machine Communication; Large Language Model (LLM); Machine Learning;
D O I
10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.008
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The recent sudden increase in the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), and generative AI in general, has astonished education professionals and learners. In formulating a response to these developments, educational institutions are constrained by a lack of clarity concerning human -machine communication and its relationship to models of education. Ideas and models from the cybernetic tradition can help to fill this gap. Two paradigms are distinguished: (1) the transmission paradigm (combining the model of learning implied by the instruments and processes of formal education and the conduit model of communication), and (2) the coordination paradigm (combining the constructivist model of learning and the coordination model of communication). It is proposed that these paradigms have long coexisted in educational practice in a modus vivendi, which is disrupted by LLMs. If an LLM can pass an examination, then from within the transmission paradigm this can only understood as demonstrating that the LLM has indeed learned and understood the material being assessed. At the same time, we know that LLMs do not in fact have the capacity to learn and understand, but rather generate a simulacrum of intelligence. It is argued that this paradox prevents educational institutions from formulating a coherent response to generative AI systems. However, within the coordination paradigm the interactions of LLMs and education institutions can be more easily understood and can be situated in a conversational model of learning. These distinctions can help institutions, educational leaders, and teachers, to frame the complex and nuanced questions raised by GenAI, and to chart a course towards its effective use in education. More specifically, they indicate that to benefit fully from the capabilities of generative AI education institutions need to recognize the validity of the coordination paradigm and adapt their processes and instruments accordingly.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:83
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Generative AI and generative education
    Gilbert, Thomas Krendl
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2024, 1534 (01) : 11 - 14
  • [2] Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarok or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators
    Lim, Weng Marc
    Gunasekara, Asanka
    Pallant, Jessica Leigh
    Pallant, Jason Ian
    Pechenkina, Ekaterina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT EDUCATION, 2023, 21 (02):
  • [3] Generative AI in education: To embrace it or not?
    Okaiyeto, Samuel Ariyo
    Bai, Junwen
    Xiao, Hongwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 16 (03) : 285 - 286
  • [4] Generative AI and CS Education
    Johnson, Maggie
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2024, 67 (04) : 22 - 23
  • [5] Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines
    Jin, Yueqiao
    Yan, Lixiang
    Echeverria, Vanessa
    Gašević, Dragan
    Martinez-Maldonado, Roberto
    [J]. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2025, 8
  • [6] The promise and challenges of generative AI in education
    Giannakos, Michail
    Azevedo, Roger
    Brusilovsky, Peter
    Cukurova, Mutlu
    Dimitriadis, Yannis
    Hernandez-Leo, Davinia
    Jaervelae, Sanna
    Mavrikis, Manolis
    Rienties, Bart
    [J]. BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2024,
  • [7] Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI
    Denny, Paul
    Prather, James
    Becker, Brett A.
    Finnie-Ansley, James
    Hellas, Arto
    Leinonen, Juho
    Luxton-Reilly, Andrew
    Reeves, Brent N.
    Santos, Eddie Antonio
    Sarsa, Sami
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2024, 67 (02) : 56 - 67
  • [8] A Comprehensive Review on Generative AI for Education
    Mittal, Uday
    Sai, Siva
    Chamola, Vinay
    Sangwan, Devika
    [J]. IEEE Access, 2024, 12 : 142733 - 142759
  • [9] Generative AI in higher education and beyond
    Hashmi, Nada
    Bal, Anjali S.
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2024, 67 (05) : 607 - 614
  • [10] Generative AI and future education: a review, theoretical validation, and authors’ perspective on challenges and solutions
    Monib, Wali Khan
    Qazi, Atika
    Apong, Rosyzie Anna
    Azizan, Mohammad Tazli
    Silva, Liyanage De
    Yassin, Hayati
    [J]. PeerJ Computer Science, 2024, 10