Preservation of the pectoralis major fascia has no impact on the long-term oncologic outcomes of patients with breast cancer treated with conservative mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: A propensity score matching analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Chen, Ao -Xiang [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li, Xin -Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Guo, Zhang -Yin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ge, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yu, Yue [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Cao, Xu -Chen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Med Univ, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Breast Canc 1, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Med Univ, Key Lab Breast Canc Prevent & Therapy, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Med Univ, Canc Inst & Hosp, Dept Breast Surg 1, Huanhuxi Rd, Tianjin 300060, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Breast cancer; Pectoralis major fascia; Conservative mastectomy; Breast reconstruction; Oncologic outcomes;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.001
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The oncologic safety of preserving the pectoralis major fascia (PMF) in patients with breast cancer remains controversial. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of preserving the PMF on long-term oncologic outcomes in patients with breast cancer treated with immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) following conservative mastectomy. Methods: We selected women with early-stage breast cancer who underwent conservative mastectomy and submuscular IBBR in our center during 2014-2019. The propensity score matching method was used to create well-balanced fascia-preserved and fascia-removed groups. Locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant me- tastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank tests between the fascia-preserved and fascia-removed groups. Results: After matching, there were 219 patients in each group. The mean follow-up time was 64.8 +/- 18.1 months for the fascia-preserved group and 64.9 +/- 18.4 months for the fascia -removed group. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of LRFS (91.3% vs. 93.8%; p = 0.818), DMFS (94.0% vs. 92.3%; p = 0.056), DFS (89.9% vs. 88.4%; p = 0.261), and OS (95.8% vs. 95.4%; p = 0.783) rates. In the fascia-preserved group, 61.5% of the locoregional recurrence events occurred within 2 years after surgery.Conclusion: Preservation of the PMF did not significantly impact the long-term oncologic out-comes in patients with breast cancer who underwent conservative mastectomy and IBBR. The PMF might be safely preserved in patients without suspicious tumor invasion into this fascia.(c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 238
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients
    Se Won Kim
    Hae Kyung Lee
    Sun Mi Kang
    Tae Ho Kang
    Chan Seok Yoon
    Seung Sang Ko
    Min Hee Hur
    Sung Soo Kang
    Chul Hwan Seul
    Ja Sung Gu
    Breast Cancer, 2016, 23 : 279 - 285
  • [42] Short-term outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction using an implant or tissue expander after mastectomy in breast cancer patients
    Kim, Se Won
    Lee, Hae Kyung
    Kang, Sun Mi
    Kang, Tae Ho
    Yoon, Chan Seok
    Ko, Seung Sang
    Hur, Min Hee
    Kang, Sung Soo
    Seul, Chul Hwan
    Gu, Ja Sung
    BREAST CANCER, 2016, 23 (02) : 279 - 285
  • [43] Short-term Outcomes of Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy Using Implant or Tissue Expander in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Kang, S.
    Kim, S.
    Kang, T.
    Yoon, C.
    Ko, S.
    Hur, M.
    Lee, H.
    Seol, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S200 - S200
  • [44] Conservative Axillary Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Mastectomy: Long-Term Results Discussion
    Klimberg, V. Suzanne
    Olson, John
    Cohwer, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (04) : 824 - 826
  • [45] Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Rachel E. Beard
    Sidrah Khan
    Roberto I. Troisi
    Roberto Montalti
    Aude Vanlander
    Yuman Fong
    T. Peter Kingham
    Thomas Boerner
    Eren Berber
    Bora Kahramangil
    Joseph F. Buell
    John B. Martinie
    Dionisios Vrochides
    Chengli Shen
    Michele Molinari
    David A. Geller
    Allan Tsung
    World Journal of Surgery, 2020, 44 : 887 - 895
  • [46] Long-term oncologic result of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Wu, Si-Yuan
    Ho, Meng-Hsing
    Chang, Hao-Ming
    Hsu, Kuo-Feng
    Yu, Jyh-Cherng
    Chan, De-Chuan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 19 (01)
  • [47] Long-term outcomes and propensity score matching analysis: rectal cancer resection for patients with elevated preoperative risk
    Feng, Hao
    Schiergens, Tobias S.
    Mao, Zhi-Hai
    Zhao, Jingkun
    Shen, Xiaohui
    Lu, Ai-Guo
    Thasler, Wolfgang E.
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (15) : 25679 - 25690
  • [48] Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Beard, Rachel E.
    Khan, Sidrah
    Troisi, Roberto I.
    Montalti, Roberto
    Vanlander, Aude
    Fong, Yuman
    Kingham, T. Peter
    Boerner, Thomas
    Berber, Eren
    Kahramangil, Bora
    Buell, Joseph F.
    Martinie, John B.
    Vrochides, Dionisios
    Shen, Chengli
    Molinari, Michele
    Geller, David A.
    Tsung, Allan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 44 (03) : 887 - 895
  • [50] Long-term oncologic result of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Si-Yuan Wu
    Meng-Hsing Ho
    Hao-Ming Chang
    Kuo-Feng Hsu
    Jyh-Cherng Yu
    De-Chuan Chan
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 19