Pharmacological treatments for low back pain in adults: an overview of Cochrane Reviews

被引:15
|
作者
Cashin, Aidan G. [1 ,2 ]
Wand, Benedict M. [3 ]
O'Connell, Neil E. [4 ]
Lee, Hopin [5 ,6 ]
Rizzo, Rodrigo R. N. [1 ,2 ]
Bagg, Matthew K. [1 ,7 ,8 ]
O'Hagan, Edel [1 ,7 ]
Maher, Christopher G. [9 ,10 ,11 ]
Furlan, Andrea D. [12 ]
van Tulder, Maurits W. [13 ]
McAuley, James H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Neurosci Res Australia, Ctr Pain IMPACT, Sydney, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Hlth Sci, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[3] Univ Notre Dame Australia, Sch Physiotherapy, Fremantle, Australia
[4] Brunel Univ London, Dept Hlth Sci, Ctr Hlth & Wellbeing Lifecourse, Uxbridge, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Newcastle, Sch Med & Publ Hlth, Newcastle, Australia
[7] Univ New South Wales, Prince Wales Clin Sch, Fac Med, Sydney, Australia
[8] Univ New South Wales, New Coll Village, Sydney, Australia
[9] Univ Sydney, Sydney Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[10] Univ Sydney, Inst Musculoskeletal Hlth, Sydney, Australia
[11] Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, Australia
[12] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[13] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Earth & Life Sci, Dept Hlth Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Acetaminophen [therapeutic use; Acute Pain [drug therapy; Analgesics; Opioid [adverse effects; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Non-Steroidal [adverse effects; Buprenorphine [therapeutic use; Low Back Pain [drug therapy; Systematic Reviews as Topic; Tramadol [therapeutic use; LABOR-FORCE PARTICIPATION; UPDATED METHOD GUIDELINES; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; HEALTH-CARE; MUSCLE-RELAXANTS; GENERAL-PRACTICE; UNITED-STATES; MANAGEMENT; ANTIDEPRESSANTS;
D O I
10.1002/14651858.CD013815.pub2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Pharmacological interventions are the most used treatment for low back pain (LBP). Use of evidence from systematic reviews of the effects of pharmacological interventions for LBP published in the Cochrane Library, is limited by lack of a comprehensive overview. Objectives To summarise the evidence from Cochrane Reviews of the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of systemic pharmacological interventions for adults with non-specific LBP. Methods The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was searched from inception to 3 June 2021, to identify reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated systemic pharmacological interventions for adults with non-specific LBP. Two authors independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the quality of the reviews and certainty of the evidence using the AMSTAR 2 and GRADE tools. The review focused on placebo comparisons and the main outcomes were pain intensity, function, and safety. Main results Seven Cochrane Reviews that included 103 studies (22,238 participants) were included. There is high confidence in the findings of five reviews, moderate confidence in one, and low confidence in the findings of another. The reviews reported data on six medicines or medicine classes: paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, opioids, and antidepressants. Three reviews included participants with acute or sub-acute LBP and five reviews included participants with chronic LBP. Acute LBP Paracetamol There was high-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference between paracetamol and placebo for reducing pain intensity (MD 0.49 on a 0 to 100 scale (higher scores indicate worse pain), 95% CI -1.99 to 2.97), reducing disability (MD 0.05 on a 0 to 24 scale (higher scores indicate worse disability), 95% CI -0.50 to 0.60), and increasing the risk of adverse events (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.33). NSAIDs There was moderate-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring NSAIDs compared to placebo at reducing pain intensity (MD -7.29 on a 0 to 100 scale (higher scores indicate worse pain), 95% CI -10.98 to -3.61), high-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference for reducing disability (MD -2.02 on a 0-24 scale (higher scores indicate worse disability), 95% CI -2.89 to -1.15), and very low-certainty evidence for no evidence of an increased risk of adverse events (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0. 63 to 1.18). Muscle relaxants and benzodiazepines There was moderate-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring muscle relaxants compared to placebo for a higher chance of pain relief (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.76), and higher chance of improving physical function (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77), and increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1. 14 to 1.98). Opioids None of the included Cochrane Reviews aimed to identify evidence for acute LBP. Antidepressants No evidence was identified by the included reviews for acute LBP. Chronic LBP Paracetamol No evidence was identified by the included reviews for chronic LBP. NSAIDs There was low-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring NSAIDs compared to placebo for reducing pain intensity (MD -6.97 on a 0 to 100 scale (higher scores indicate worse pain), 95% CI -10.74 to -3.19), reducing disability (MD -0.85 on a 0-24 scale (higher scores indicate worse disability), 95% CI -1.30 to -0.40), and no evidence of an increased risk of adverse events (RR 1.04, 95% CI -0.92 to 1.17), all at intermediate-term follow-up (> 3 months and = 12 months postintervention). Muscle relaxants and benzodiazepines There was low-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring benzodiazepines compared to placebo for a higher chance of pain relief (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.93), and low-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference between muscle relaxants and placebo in the risk of adverse events (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.57). Opioids There was high-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring tapentadol compared to placebo at reducing pain intensity (MD -8.00 on a 0 to 100 scale (higher scores indicate worse pain), 95% CI -1.22 to -0.38), moderate-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring strong opioids for reducing pain intensity (SMD -0.43, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.33), low-certainty evidence for a medium between-group difference favouring tramadol for reducing pain intensity (SMD -0.55, 95% CI -0.66 to -0.44) and very low-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring buprenorphine for reducing pain intensity (SMD -0.41, 95% CI -0.57 to -0.26). There was moderate-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring strong opioids compared to placebo for reducing disability (SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.37 to -0.15), moderate-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring tramadol for reducing disability (SMD -0.18, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.07), and low-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference favouring buprenorphine for reducing disability (SMD -0.14, 95% CI -0.53 to -0.25). There was low-certainty evidence for a small between-group difference for an increased risk of adverse events for opioids (all types) compared to placebo; nausea (RD 0.10, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.14), headaches (RD 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.05), constipation (RD 0.07, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.11), and dizziness (RD 0.08, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.11). Antidepressants There was low-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference for antidepressants (all types) compared to placebo for reducing pain intensity (SMD -0.04, 95% CI -0.25 to 0.17) and reducing disability (SMD -0.06, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.29). Authors' conclusions We found no high- or moderate-certainty evidence that any investigated pharmacological intervention provided a large or medium effect on pain intensity for acute or chronic LBP compared to placebo. For acute LBP, we found moderate-certainty evidence that NSAIDs and muscle relaxants may provide a small effect on pain, and high-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference between paracetamol and placebo. For safety, we found very low- and high-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference with NSAIDs and paracetamol compared to placebo for the risk of adverse events, and moderate-certainty evidence that muscle relaxants may increase the risk of adverse events. For chronic LBP, we found low-certainty evidence that NSAIDs and very low- to high-certainty evidence that opioids may provide a small effect on pain. For safety, we found low-certainty evidence for no evidence of difference between NSAIDs and placebo for the risk of adverse events, and low-certainty evidence that opioids may increase the risk of adverse events.
引用
收藏
页数:51
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Pharmacological Management of Low Back Pain
    Roger Chou
    Drugs, 2010, 70 : 387 - 402
  • [32] Crowdsourcing Treatments for Low Back Pain
    Hosio, Simo Johannes
    Karppinen, Jaro
    Takala, Esa-Pekka
    Takatalo, Jani
    Goncalves, Jorge
    van Berkel, Niels
    Konomi, Shin'ichi
    Kostakos, Vassilis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI 2018), 2018,
  • [33] Completeness of outcome description in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews
    Castellini, Greta
    Gianola, Silvia
    Frigerio, Pamela
    Agostini, Michela
    Bolotta, Rosa
    Corbetta, Davide
    Gasparini, Monica
    Gozzer, Paolo
    Guariento, Erica
    Li, Linda
    Pecoraro, Valentina
    Sirtori, Valeria
    Turolla, Andrea
    Moja, Lorenzo
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [34] Comparison of treatments for low back pain
    不详
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 112 (1085) : 112 - 112
  • [35] Completeness of outcome description in studies for low back pain rehabilitation interventions: a survey of trials included in Cochrane reviews
    Greta Castellini
    Silvia Gianola
    Pamela Frigerio
    Michela Agostini
    Rosa Bolotta
    Davide Corbetta
    Monica Gasparini
    Paolo Gozzer
    Erica Guariento
    Linda Li
    Valentina Pecoraro
    Valeria Sirtori
    Andrea Turolla
    Lorenzo Moja
    Trials, 16
  • [36] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic pain - an overview of Cochrane Reviews
    Gibson, William
    Wand, Benedict M.
    Meads, Catherine
    Catley, Mark J.
    O'Connell, Neil E.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2019, (04):
  • [37] Pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in children: an overview of systematic reviews
    Eccleston, Christopher
    Fisher, Emma
    Cooper, Tess E.
    Gregoire, Marie-Claude
    Heathcote, Lauren C.
    Krane, Elliot
    Lord, Susan M.
    Sethna, Navil F.
    Anderson, Anna-Karenia
    Anderson, Brian
    Clinch, Jacqueline
    Gray, Andrew L.
    Gold, Jeffrey, I
    Howard, Richard F.
    Ljungman, Gustaf
    Moore, R. Andrew
    Schechter, Neil
    Wiffen, Philip J.
    Wilkinson, Nick M. R.
    William, David G.
    Wood, Chantal
    van Tilburg, Miranda A. L.
    Zernikow, Boris
    PAIN, 2019, 160 (08) : 1698 - 1707
  • [38] An overview of two Cochrane systematic reviews of complementary treatments for chronic asthma: acupuncture and homeopathy
    McCarney, RW
    Lasserson, TJ
    Linde, K
    Brinkhaus, B
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2004, 98 (08) : 687 - 696
  • [39] 2016 COCHRANE REVIEW: PHARMACOLOGICAL TREATMENTS FOR BLADDER PAIN SYNDROME/INTERSTITIAL CYSTITIS
    Ford, A.
    Ramage, C.
    Ballard, P.
    Ogah, J.
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2016, 35 : S357 - S357
  • [40] Overviews and systematic reviews on low back pain
    Bjordal, Jan M.
    Klovning, Atle
    Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo Alvaro B.
    Roland, Pal-Didrik Hoff
    Joensen, Jon
    Slordal, Lars
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2008, 148 (10) : 789 - 790