Does Baseline Mental Health Influence Outcomes among Workers' Compensation Claimants Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

被引:3
|
作者
Patel, Madhav Rajesh [1 ]
Jacob, Kevin Chacko [1 ]
Amin, Kanhai S. [1 ]
Ribot, Max A. [1 ]
Pawlowski, Hanna [1 ]
Prabhu, Michael C. [1 ]
Vanjani, Nisheka Navin [1 ]
Singh, Kern [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, 1611 W Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
12-Item Short Form Mental Composite Scale; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Workers' compensation; Patientreported outcome measures; Minimal clinically important difference; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; IMPROVEMENTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.31616/asj.2021.0388
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study. Purpose: This study investigated the influence of preoperative mental health on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) among workers' compensation (WC) recipients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF). Overview of Literature: No studies have evaluated the impact of preoperative mental functioning on outcomes following MIS TLIF among WC claimants. Methods: WC recipients undergoing single-level MIS TLIF were identified. PROMs of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Physical and Mental Composite Scale (SF-12 PCS/MCS), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function evaluated subjects preoperatively/postoperatively. Subjects were grouped according to preoperative SF-12 MCS: <41 vs. >= 41. Demographic/perioperative variables, Delta PROMs, and MCID were compared using inferential statistics. Multiple regression was used to account for differences in spinal pathology. Results: The SF-12 MCS <41 and SF-12 MCS >= 41 groups included 48 and 45 patients, respectively. Significant differences in.PROMs were observed at SF-12 MCS at all timepoints, except at 6 months (p <= 0.041, all). The SF-12 MCS <41 group had worse preoperative to 6-months SF-12 MCS, 12-weeks/6-months VAS back, 12-week VAS leg, and preoperative to 6-months ODI (p <= 0.029, all). The SF-12 MCS <41 group had greater MCID achievement for overall ODI and 6-weeks/1-year/overall SF-12 MCS (p <= 0.043, all); the SF-12 MCS >= 41 group had greater attainment for 6-month VAS back (p=0.004). Conclusions: Poorer mental functioning adversely affected the baseline and intermediate postoperative quality-of-life outcomes pertaining to mental health, back pain, and disability among WC recipients undergoing lumbar fusion. However, outcomes did not differ 1-2 years after surgery. While MCID achievement for pain and physical function was largely unaffected by preoperative mental health score, WC recipients with poorer baseline mental health demonstrated higher rates of overall clinically meaningful improvements for disability and mental health.
引用
收藏
页码:96 / 108
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Outpatient Setting
    Emami, Arash
    Faloon, Michael
    Issa, Kimona
    Shafa, Eiman
    Pourtaheri, Sina
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki S.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 39 (06) : E1218 - E1222
  • [32] Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive surgery during transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion/posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Heary, Robert F.
    Kaiser, Michael G.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 24 (03) : 413 - 414
  • [33] Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis
    Wang, Yang-Yi
    Chung, Yu-Hsuan
    Huang, Chun-Hsien
    Hu, Ming-Hsien
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [34] Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Lee, Kong Hwee
    Yue, Wai Mun
    Yeo, William
    Soeharno, Henry
    Tan, Seang Beng
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (11) : 2265 - 2270
  • [35] Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
    Kong Hwee Lee
    Wai Mun Yue
    William Yeo
    Henry Soeharno
    Seang Beng Tan
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 2265 - 2270
  • [36] The Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Single Level Fusion
    Kim, Moon-Chan
    Chung, Hung-Tae
    Kim, Dong-Jun
    Kim, Sang-Hyuk
    Jeon, Sang-Ho
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 5 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [37] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Vazan, Martin
    Gempt, Jens
    Meyer, Bernhard
    Buchmann, Niels
    Ryang, Yu-Mi
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2017, 159 (06) : 1137 - 1146
  • [38] Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a technical description and review of the literature
    Martin Vazan
    Jens Gempt
    Bernhard Meyer
    Niels Buchmann
    Yu- Mi Ryang
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 2017, 159 : 1137 - 1146
  • [39] Association of Preoperative Physical Function and Changes in Mental Health After Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
    Jenkins, Nathaniel W.
    Parrish, James M.
    Lynch, Conor P.
    Cha, Elliot D. K.
    Jadczak, Caroline N.
    Mohan, Shruthi
    Geoghegan, Cara E.
    Singh, Kern
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06): : 1115 - 1122
  • [40] Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Lin, Lu
    Liu, Xiao-Qin
    Shi, Lei
    Cheng, Si
    Wang, Zhi-Qiang
    Ge, Qi-Jun
    Gao, Ding-Zhi
    Ismail, Amadou Cheffou
    Ke, Zhen-Yong
    Chu, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9