Adjoint-based machine learning for active flow control

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Xuemin [1 ]
Macart, Jonathan F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Notre Dame, Dept Aerosp & Mech Engn, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
关键词
SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; CIRCULAR-CYLINDER; FEEDBACK-CONTROL; SIMULATION; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.013901
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
We develop neural-network active flow controllers using a deep learning partial differential equation augmentation method (DPM). The end-to-end sensitivities for optimization are computed using adjoints of the governing equations without restriction on the terms that may appear in the objective function. In one-dimensional Burgers' examples with analytic (manufactured) control functions, DPM-based control is comparably effective to standard supervised learning for in-sample solutions and more effective for out-of-sample solutions, i.e., with different analytic control functions. The influence of the optimization time interval and neutral-network width is analyzed, the results of which influence algorithm design and hyperparameter choice, balancing control efficacy with computational cost. We subsequently develop adjoint-based controllers for two flow scenarios. First, we compare the drag-reduction performance and optimization cost of adjoint-based controllers and deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based controllers for two-dimensional, incompressible, confined flow over a cylinder at Re = 100, with control achieved by synthetic body forces along the cylinder boundary. The required model complexity for the DRL-based controller is 4229 times that required for the DPM-based controller. In these tests, the DPM-based controller is 4.85 times more effective and 63.2 times less computationally intensive to train than the DRL-based controller. Second, we test DPM-based control for compressible, unconfined flow over a cylinder and extrapolate the controller to out-of-sample Reynolds numbers. We also train a simplified, steady, offline controller based on the DPM control law. Both online (DPM) and offline (steady) controllers stabilize the vortex shedding with a 99% drag reduction, demonstrating the robustness of the learning approach. For out-of-sample flows (Re = {50, 200, 300, 400}), both the online and offline controllers successfully reduce drag and stabilize vortex shedding, indicating that the DPM-based approach results in a stable model. A key attractive feature is the flexibility of adjoint-based optimization, which permits optimization over arbitrarily defined control laws without the need to match a priori known functions.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discrete adjoint-based optimization approach for laminar flow wings
    Yang T.
    Wang Y.
    Wang Y.
    Shi Y.
    Zhou Z.
    Hangkong Xuebao/Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 2022, 43 (12):
  • [22] Adjoint-based optimal actuation for separated flow past an airfoil
    Thompson, Ernold
    Goza, Andres
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2025, 37 (03)
  • [23] Adjoint-based estimation and control of spatial, temporal and stochastic approximation errors in unsteady flow simulations
    Lakshminarayan, Vinod K.
    Duraisamy, Karthik
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2015, 121 : 180 - 191
  • [24] Control and Optimization of Interfacial Flows Using Adjoint-Based Techniques
    Fikl, Alexandru
    Le Chenadec, Vincent
    Sayadi, Taraneh
    FLUIDS, 2020, 5 (03)
  • [25] An adjoint-based lattice Boltzmann method for noise control problems
    Vergnault, E.
    Sagaut, P.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2014, 276 : 39 - 61
  • [26] Adjoint-based optimization of experimental designs with many control variables
    Walter, Sebastian F.
    Schmidt, Andreas
    Koerkel, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF PROCESS CONTROL, 2014, 24 (10) : 1504 - 1515
  • [27] TWO ADJOINT-BASED OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES FOR A FREE SURFACE STOKES FLOW
    Repke, Sabine
    Marheineke, Nicole
    Pinnau, Rene
    SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2011, 71 (06) : 2168 - 2184
  • [28] Adjoint-based shape optimization for compressible flow based on volume penalization method
    Liu, Ming
    Hasegawa, Yosuke
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2024,
  • [29] Adjoint-based computation of nonlocal eddy viscosity in turbulent channel flow
    Liu, Jessie
    Bryngelson, Spencer H.
    Zaki, Tamer A.
    Mani, Ali
    PHYSICAL REVIEW FLUIDS, 2024, 9 (09):
  • [30] Adjoint-based shape optimization using lattice Boltzmann method for flow and sound control in tandem cylinders
    Kusano, Kazuya
    Yamaguchi, Hiroki
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2025, 135