共 35 条
Machine learning approaches to identify systemic lupus erythematosus in anti-nuclear antibody-positive patients using genomic data and electronic health records
被引:4
|作者:
Chung, Chih-Wei
[1
]
Chou, Seng-Cho
[1
]
Hsiao, Tzu-Hung
[2
,3
,4
]
Zhang, Grace Joyce
[5
]
Chung, Yu-Fang
[6
]
Chen, Yi-Ming
[2
,7
,8
,9
,10
,11
,12
]
机构:
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Informat Management, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Med Res, Taichung, Taiwan
[3] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, New Taipei City, Taiwan
[4] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Inst Genom & Bioinformat, Taichung, Taiwan
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Cellular & Physiol Sci, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Tunghai Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Taichung, Taiwan
[7] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Allergy, 1650,Sect 4,Taiwan Blvd, Taichung 407, Taiwan
[8] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Dept Postbaccalaureate Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[9] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[10] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Rong Hsing Res Ctr Translat Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[11] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Ph D Program Translat Med, Taichung, Taiwan
[12] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Coll Med, Precis Med Res Ctr, Taichung, Taiwan
关键词:
Machine learning;
Systemic lupus erythematosus;
Anti-nuclear antibody;
Polygenic risk score;
Single nucleotide polymorphism;
DIAGNOSIS;
ONSET;
D O I:
10.1186/s13040-023-00352-y
中图分类号:
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号:
07 ;
0710 ;
09 ;
摘要:
BackgroundAlthough the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has required at least a positive anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) titer (>= 1:80), it remains challenging for clinicians to identify patients with SLE. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) approach to assist in the detection of SLE patients using genomic data and electronic health records.MethodsParticipants with a positive ANA (>= 1:80) were enrolled from the Taiwan Precision Medicine Initiative cohort. The Taiwan Biobank version 2 array was used to detect single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. Six ML models, Logistic Regression, Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine, Light Gradient Boosting Machine, Gradient Tree Boosting, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB), were used to identify SLE patients. The importance of the clinical and genetic features was determined by Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) values. A logistic regression model was applied to identify genetic variations associated with SLE in the subset of patients with an ANA equal to or exceeding 1:640.ResultsA total of 946 SLE and 1,892 non-SLE controls were included in this analysis. Among the six ML models, RF and XGB demonstrated superior performance in the differentiation of SLE from non-SLE. The leading features in the SHAP diagram were anti-double strand DNA antibodies, ANA titers, AC4 ANA pattern, polygenic risk scores, complement levels, and SNPs. Additionally, in the subgroup with a high ANA titer (>= 1:640), six SNPs positively associated with SLE and five SNPs negatively correlated with SLE were discovered.ConclusionsML approaches offer the potential to assist in diagnosing SLE and uncovering novel SNPs in a group of patients with autoimmunity.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文