Using latent variable analysis to capture individual differences in bilingual language experience

被引:1
|
作者
Navarro, Ester [1 ]
Rossi, Eleonora [2 ]
机构
[1] St Johns Univ, Dept Psychol, Queens, NY 11432 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Linguist, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
bilingual experience; latent variable analysis; social networks; individual differences; EXECUTIVE CONTROL; PROFICIENCY; ALPHA; WORLD;
D O I
10.1017/S1366728923000846
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Bilingualism is an experience that varies across a continuum and can change across the lifespan. Psychometric research is an underexplored avenue with the potential to further our understanding of the mechanisms and traits underlying bilingual experiences. Here, we developed and validated a social network questionnaire to measure sociolinguistic features in 212 individuals via personal social network. Confirmatory factor analysis examined the measurement structure of the variables. Compared to a one-factor model, the best fitting model was a two-factor model in which the language experience of the individual (i.e., ego) and the language experience of the individual's network (i.e., alters) were correlated latent factors under which aspects of the bilingual experience loaded. Additional analyses revealed other potential ways to examine the data in future analyses. These results provide the first measurement model of bilingual experiences, and provide support for theoretical accounts suggesting differential neuropsychological outcomes based on individual bilingual variability. The results also support the use of social network tools to capture differences in bilingualism.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Language switching costs in bilingual mathematics learning: Transfer effects and individual differences
    Volmer, Esther
    Grabner, Roland H.
    Saalbach, Henrik
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ERZIEHUNGSWISSENSCHAFT, 2018, 21 (01): : 71 - 96
  • [22] General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation
    Muthen, BO
    Curran, PJ
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 1997, 2 (04) : 371 - 402
  • [23] Are Individual Differences in Attention Control Related to Working Memory Capacity? A Latent Variable Mega-Analysis
    Unsworth, Nash
    Miller, Ashley L.
    Robison, Matthew K.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2021, 150 (07) : 1332 - 1357
  • [24] Identifying Individual Differences among Bilingual Class Students Using the Hierarchical Cluster Analysis Method
    Wang, Yi-Cheng
    Liu, Xin-Wei
    Yang, Hong-Xiao
    Wang, Kai-Rong
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT (ICAEM 2015), 2015, : 13 - 16
  • [25] Robust neurocognitive individual differences in grammatical agreement processing: A latent variable approach
    Tanner, Darren
    CORTEX, 2019, 111 : 210 - 237
  • [26] The undesired self and emotional experience: A latent variable analysis
    Phillips, Ann G.
    Silvia, Paul J.
    Paradise, Matthew J.
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 26 (09) : 1035 - 1047
  • [27] Experience, aptitude and individual differences in native language ultimate attainment
    Dabrowska, Ewa
    COGNITION, 2018, 178 : 222 - 235
  • [28] Commentary on latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis for characterizing individual differences in learning
    Bray, Bethany C.
    Dziak, John J.
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 66 : 105 - 110
  • [29] Acute alcohol effects on set-shifting and its moderation by baseline individual differences: a latent variable analysis
    Korucuoglu, Ozlem
    Sher, Kenneth J.
    Wood, Phillip K.
    Saults, John Scott
    Altamirano, Lee
    Miyake, Akira
    Bartholow, Bruce D.
    ADDICTION, 2017, 112 (03) : 442 - 453
  • [30] Informative tools for characterizing individual differences in learning: Latent class, latent profile, and latent transition analysis
    Hickendorff, Marian
    Edelsbrunner, Peter A.
    McMullen, Jake
    Schneider, Michael
    Trezise, Kelly
    LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2018, 66 : 4 - 15