Functional status in non-elite football players 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

被引:0
|
作者
Kublin, Kamil [1 ]
Szlachta, Grzegorz [1 ]
Debski, Przemyslaw [1 ]
Karczewski, Igor [2 ]
机构
[1] Jerzy Kukuczka Acad Phys Educ, Inst Physiotherapy & Hlth Sci, Mot Anal Lab, Katowice, Poland
[2] Sport Klin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Scanmed Sport, Zory, Poland
关键词
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; isokinetic strength; Functional Movement Screen; functional assessment; MUSCLE STRENGTH; ACL RECONSTRUCTION; MOVEMENT SCREEN; RETURN; PERFORMANCE; INJURIES; ASYMMETRY; SPORTS; RISK; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.5507/ag.2023.014
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Background: Objective criteria to accurately evaluate the ability of a patient to make a risk-free return to their previous level of activity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to progress through stages of the rehabilitation process are still widely discussed. Objective: The goal of the study was to investigate the functional status of non-elite football players 6 months after ACLR based on the Functional Movement Screen test (FMS) and side-to-side differences of isokinetic quadriceps and hamstring peak torque between the operated (OP) and non-operated (NOP) extremities. Methods: A total of 35 football players (male:female ratio 31:4, mean age 24.7 +/- 2.8 years) who had undergone primary and isolated ACLR were assessed 6 months (mean 6.1 +/- 2.6) after surgery. Functional performance evaluation included the FMS test and isokinetic quadriceps/hamstring peak torque values examined using the Biodex Testing System at angular velocities of 60 deg/s and 180 deg/s. In addition, side-to-side differences for flexion and extension at both angular velocities were calculated by the limb symmetry index. Results: In the functional assessment, the overall score of the FMS test was 15.34 +/- 2.60. Moreover, inter-extremity differences in all isokinetic strength tests were statistically significant. Isokinetic strength peak torques of quadriceps and hamstring of NOP were significantly higher than those of OP at both angular velocities (p < .001). The limb symmetry index results for recorded peak torques at 60 deg/s were 75% in extension and 88% in flexion and at 180 deg/s were 79% in extension and 86% in flexion. Conclusion: The presented data indicate explicit inter-extremity muscles strength differences and disturbances in global movement patterns after ACLR. Delayed recovery of muscle strength and disparities between the OP and NOP limbs 6 months after ACLR may undermine the patient's readiness to return to preoperative activity.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Neuromuscular Functional Changes of the Quadriceps after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
    Cicekli, O.
    Bingol, I
    Tepe, N.
    Akgul, T.
    Cicekli, E.
    Atbinici, H.
    Arslan, A. K.
    WEST INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 69 (04): : 196 - 200
  • [42] Postural control after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and functional rehabilitation
    Henriksson, M
    Ledin, T
    Good, L
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (03): : 359 - 366
  • [43] Functional testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the pediatric population
    Kwiatkowski, Barbara
    Tercier, Stephane
    Vaucher, Sandrine
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2018, 148 : 16S - 16S
  • [44] Rehabilitation after first-time anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction in female football players: A study of resilience factors
    Johnson U.
    Ivarsson A.
    Karlsson J.
    Hägglund M.
    Waldén M.
    Börjesson M.
    BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, 8 (1)
  • [45] Return to Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in National Football League Athletes
    Shah, Vishal M.
    Andrews, James R.
    Fleisig, Glenn S.
    McMichael, Christopher S.
    Lemak, Lawrence J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2010, 38 (11): : 2233 - 2239
  • [46] Functional recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A longitudinal perspective
    Hopper, Diana M.
    Strauss, Geoff R.
    Boyle, Jeff J.
    Bell, Jonathan
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 89 (08): : 1535 - 1541
  • [47] Functional Bracing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Lowe, Walter R.
    Warth, Ryan J.
    Davis, Elizabeth P.
    Bailey, Lane
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2017, 25 (03) : 239 - 249
  • [48] Selected physical capacity norms for Australian football players at the non-elite level
    Batt, Angela K.
    Braham, Rebecca A.
    Goodman, Carmel
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MEDICINE IN SPORT, 2007, 10 (02) : 119 - 126
  • [49] The effect of proprioception exercises on functional status in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
    Ordahan, Banu
    Kucuksen, Sami
    Tuncay, Ibrahim
    Salli, Ali
    Ugurlu, Hatice
    JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 28 (03) : 531 - 537
  • [50] Outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in soccer players
    Brophy, Robert H.
    Huston, Laura J.
    Haas, Amanda
    Albright, John P.
    Allen, Christina R.
    Amendola, Annunziato
    Baker, Champ L., III
    Carey, James L.
    Cox, Charles L.
    Creighton, R. Alexander
    Dunn, Warren R.
    Haas, Amanda K.
    Hannafin, Jo A.
    Hershman, Elliott B.
    Hoellrich, Rudolf G.
    Kamath, Ganesh, V
    Lantz, Brett A.
    Levy, Bruce A.
    Ma, C. Benjamin
    Marx, Robert G.
    Matava, Matthew J.
    McCormack, Robert G.
    Slauterbeck, James R.
    Smith, Matthew, V
    Spang, Jeffrey T.
    Spindler, Kurt P.
    Stuart, Michael J.
    Taft, Timothy N.
    Viskontas, Darius G.
    Wolf, Brian R.
    Wright, Rick W.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2021, 2 (12): : 1043 - 1048