Group sequential two-stage preference designs

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Ruyi [1 ,2 ]
Li, Fan [1 ,3 ]
Esserman, Denise [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Mary M. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Methods Implementat & Prevent Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Yale Ctr Analyt Sci, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Populat Hlth Sci & Biostat, Madison, WI USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Informat, Madison, WI USA
[6] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Populat Hlth Sci & Biostat, Madison, WI 53726 USA
[7] Univ Wisconsin Madison, Dept Med Informat, Madison, WI 53726 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
group sequential monitoring; independent increments; preference effect; preference trial; two-stage randomized clinical trial; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SELECTION; TESTS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1002/sim.9962
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The two-stage preference design (TSPD) enables inference for treatment efficacy while allowing for incorporation of patient preference to treatment. It can provide unbiased estimates for selection and preference effects, where a selection effect occurs when patients who prefer one treatment respond differently than those who prefer another, and a preference effect is the difference in response caused by an interaction between the patient's preference and the actual treatment they receive. One potential barrier to adopting TSPD in practice, however, is the relatively large sample size required to estimate selection and preference effects with sufficient power. To address this concern, we propose a group sequential two-stage preference design (GS-TSPD), which combines TSPD with sequential monitoring for early stopping. In the GS-TSPD, pre-planned sequential monitoring allows investigators to conduct repeated hypothesis tests on accumulated data prior to full enrollment to assess study eligibility for early trial termination without inflating type I error rates. Thus, the procedure allows investigators to terminate the study when there is sufficient evidence of treatment, selection, or preference effects during an interim analysis, thereby reducing the design resource in expectation. To formalize such a procedure, we verify the independent increments assumption for testing the selection and preference effects and apply group sequential stopping boundaries from the approximate sequential density functions. Simulations are then conducted to investigate the operating characteristics of our proposed GS-TSPD compared to the traditional TSPD. We demonstrate the applicability of the design using a study of Hepatitis C treatment modality.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 341
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimal two-stage group-sequential designs
    Lokhnygina, Yuliya
    Tsiatis, Anastasios A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2008, 138 (02) : 489 - 499
  • [2] Two-stage group sequential designs for comparative clinical trials
    Bacanh, Sevil
    Peker, Özgür K.
    Demirhan, Yaprak Parlak
    [J]. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 2008, 13 (01) : 31 - 40
  • [3] Point estimation following a two-stage group sequential trial
    Grayling, Michael J.
    Wason, James M. S.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (02) : 287 - 304
  • [4] A Bayesian two-stage group sequential scheme for ordinal endpoints
    Zhong, Chengxue
    Miao, Hongyu
    Pan, Haitao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2023, 72 (03) : 670 - 687
  • [5] Group sequential, sample size re-estimation and two-stage adaptive designs in clinical trials: A comparison
    Shih, WJ
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2006, 25 (06) : 933 - 941
  • [6] A two-stage stochastic preference analysis on group decision making with interval additive preference relations
    Li, Jiabei
    Zhou, Ligang
    Martinez, Luis
    Deveci, Muhammet
    Wu, Qun
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 254
  • [7] Optimal designs for two-stage inference
    Stallrich, Jonathan
    McKibben, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 56 (04) : 327 - 341
  • [8] Flexible two-stage designs: An overview
    Bauer, P
    Brannath, W
    Posch, M
    [J]. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE, 2001, 40 (02) : 117 - 121
  • [9] Inference for two-stage sampling designs
    Chauvet, Guillaume
    Vallee, Audrey-Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2020, 82 (03) : 797 - 815
  • [10] Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials
    Helmut Schütz
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2015, 71 : 271 - 281