Hybrid Biomass- and Electricity-Based Kerosene Production-A Techno-Economic Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Voss, Steffen [1 ]
Bube, Stefan [1 ]
Kaltschmitt, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Univ Technol TUHH, Inst Environm Technol & Energy Econ IUE, D-21073 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
CORN STOVER HARVEST; POWER-TO-LIQUIDS; WATER ELECTROLYSIS; CLIMATE IMPACT; CURRENT STATE; ETHANOL; STEAM; DEHYDRATION; AVIATION; CONVERSION;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04876
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Substitution of fossil kerosene with sustainable aviation fuels (SAFs) is a key instrument for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the aviation industry and achieving the sector's climate targets. Today, purely biomass- or electricity-based SAF production pathways are discussed. However, combining both approaches offers potential advantages, especially in terms of carbon utilization and product maximization. Thus, the goal of this paper is to carry out a techno-economic analysis of two hybrid processes that combine both biomass- and electricity-based production processes and can thus directly utilize the CO2 off-gas that inevitably occurs in the biomass-based process. The investigated process pathways are characterized by the biogenic intermediates being ethanol and biogas. The respective pathways are analyzed and compared in terms of technical (carbon and energy efficiency) and economic (kerosene production costs) indicators based on steady-state process simulation. These investigations show that although the process using ethanol is more efficient in terms of carbon utilization, it has a higher specific energy requirement for the target product kerosene than the biogas-based process. In both processes, the carbon and energy efficiency are below 30%, partly due to the unused carbon and energy of the solid residue, which cannot be biochemically converted. Despite the differences in process technology, both processes can achieve approximately the same kerosene production costs of 2775 euro(2022)/t(Kero). The addition of the electricity-based process results in significantly increasing production costs resulting from the investments in electrolyzers and the cost of renewable electricity. However, carbon efficiency and product generation can be increased by 13% points in terms of total hydrocarbon production compared to those of a purely biomass-based production.
引用
收藏
页码:5263 / 5278
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Techno-Economic Analysis of a Flexible Process Concept for the Production of Transport Fuels and Heat from Biomass and Renewable Electricity
    Habermeyer, Felix
    Kurkela, Esa
    Maier, Simon
    Dietrich, Ralph-Uwe
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
  • [22] Techno-economic analysis of biomass to transportation fuels and electricity via fast pyrolysis and hydroprocessing
    Brown, Tristan R.
    Thilakaratne, Rajeeva
    Brown, Robert C.
    Hu, Guiping
    [J]. FUEL, 2013, 106 : 463 - 469
  • [23] A techno-economic review of biomass gasification for production of chemicals
    Wang, Shu-Wen
    Li, De-Xun
    Ruan, Wen-Biao
    Jin, Chen-Lin
    Farahani, Mohammad Reza
    [J]. ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2018, 13 (08) : 351 - 356
  • [24] Techno-economic evaluation of hybrid systems for hydrogen production from biomass and natural gas
    Kassem, N
    [J]. GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2001, : 771 - 776
  • [25] An environmental and techno-economic analysis of shore side electricity
    Dai, Lei
    Hu, Hao
    Wang, Zhaojing
    Shi, Yifan
    Ding, Wenyi
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 75 : 223 - 235
  • [26] Techno-Economic Analysis of Dimethyl Ether Production from Different Biomass Resources and Off-Grid Renewable Electricity
    Kofler, René
    Campion, Nicolas
    Hillestad, Magne
    Meesenburg, Wiebke
    Clausen, Lasse Røngaard
    [J]. Energy and Fuels, 2024, 38 (10): : 8777 - 8803
  • [27] Techno-Economic Analysis of Dimethyl Ether Production from Different Biomass Resources and Off-Grid Renewable Electricity
    Kofler, Rene
    Campion, Nicolas
    Hillestad, Magne
    Meesenburg, Wiebke
    Clausen, Lasse Rongaard
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2024, 38 (10) : 8777 - 8803
  • [28] Techno-economic analysis of electricity and heat production by co-gasification of coal, biomass and waste tyre in South Africa
    Ozonoh, M.
    Aniokete, T. C.
    Oboirien, B. O.
    Daramola, M. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 : 192 - 206
  • [29] Techno-economic analysis of green and blue hybrid processes for ammonia production
    Sungjun Park
    Yonghyeon Shin
    Eunha Jeong
    Myungwan Han
    [J]. Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2023, 40 : 2657 - 2670
  • [30] Techno-economic analysis of green and blue hybrid processes for ammonia production
    Park, Sungjun
    Shin, Yonghyeon
    Jeong, Eunha
    Han, Myungwan
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2023, 40 (11) : 2657 - 2670