Prospects of Taiwan's solar energy development and policy formulation

被引:2
|
作者
Kung, Shan-Shan [1 ]
Li, Hailing [2 ]
Kung, Chih-Chun [3 ]
机构
[1] Hubei Univ Econ, Sch Foreign Studies, Wuhan 430205, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangxi Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Nanchang 330013, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Res, Weihai 264209, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Crystalline silicon (c -Si); Cadmium telluride thin-film (CdTe); Economic analysis; Investment strategy; Carbon offset; OPTIMUM TILT ANGLE; CRYSTALLINE; PERFORMANCE; REQUIREMENTS; TECHNOLOGIES; ORIENTATION; COLLECTOR; IMPACTS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23811
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Taiwan lacks energy stock and has been paying great attention to developing renewable energy to improve energy security and sustain economic growth. Solar energy is attractive to Taiwan's government as the recorded radiation is substantial, and a significant amount of fallow land is available for panel installation. This study investigates the potential solar energy production from Crystalline silicon (c-Si) and cadmium Telluride thin-film (CdTe) cell systems, estimates each system's capital requirement, and compares the economic and environmental benefits to explore effective investment strategy. The results show that, on average, the c-Si module could produce 10,644 GWh per year while the CdTe mode would yield a total electricity of about 9365 GWh. The useful life also plays an essential role in the investment requirement. With a 30-year useful life, the systems can reduce the annualized installation and maintenance cost to about NT$3.16 billion. In terms of offset efficiency, every MWh produced would result in at least 13.63-15.49 metric ton of carbon emission offset, and the offset value per GWh can be up to NT$5.77 million, which provide attractive economic incentives to energy suppliers. We point out that the acquisition of low-cost financing sources such as green bonds, as well as the improvement of current emission trading systems (ETS), would greatly benefit solar energy development.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Solar energy policy directions for safer and cleaner development in Nigeria
    Ozoegwu, Chigbogu Godwin
    Akpan, Patrick Udeme-obong
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 150
  • [42] Hydrogen Energy: Development Prospects, Current Obstacles and Policy Suggestions under China's “Dual Carbon” Goals
    SUN Zuoyu
    [J]. Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies, 2023, (01) : 101 - 114
  • [43] Hydrogen Energy: Development Prospects, Current Obstacles and Policy Suggestions under China's "Dual Carbon" Goals
    Sun, Zuoyu
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF URBAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 11 (01)
  • [44] Assessment of Energy Transition Policy in Taiwan-A View of Sustainable Development Perspectives
    Wang, Chun-Kai
    Lee, Chien-Ming
    Hong, Yue-Rong
    Cheng, Kan
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (15)
  • [45] BIOTECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT POLICY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF TAIWAN IN THE 1990-2000s.
    Troynina, Ekaterina Y.
    [J]. VESTNIK TOMSKOGO GOSUDARSTVENNOGO UNIVERSITETA ISTORIYA-TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF HISTORY, 2015, (04): : 79 - 84
  • [46] Renewable energy in the early XXI century and prospects for development of solar engineering in Uzbekistan
    Zakhidov R.A.
    Saidov M.S.
    [J]. Applied Solar Energy, 2009, 45 (1) : 1 - 6
  • [47] ENERGY POLICY AND PROSPECTS IN NORWAY.
    Noreng, Oystein
    [J]. Annual Review of Energy, 1986, 11 : 393 - 415
  • [48] ENERGY-POLICY AND PROSPECTS IN NORWAY
    NORENG, O
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1986, 11 : 393 - 415
  • [49] RESEARCH OF CREDIT POLICY PROSPECTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF UKRAINE'S AGRICULTURAL COMPLEX
    Shmygol, N.
    Galtsova, O.
    Kushnir, S.
    Beisenova, L.
    Zasoba, S.
    Matvejciuk, L.
    [J]. FINANCIAL AND CREDIT ACTIVITY-PROBLEMS OF THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 1 (42): : 34 - 40
  • [50] Policies and legislation driving Taiwan's development of renewable energy
    Liou, Hwa Meei
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (07): : 1763 - 1781