Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization

被引:0
|
作者
Werey, Fabien [1 ,2 ]
Dembinski, Jeanne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Michaud, Audrey [4 ]
Sabbagh, Charles [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mauvais, Francois [5 ]
Yzet, Thierry [2 ,6 ]
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amiens Univ, Dept Digest Surg, Med Ctr, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
[2] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
[3] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, SSPC UPJV Simplificat Soins Patients Chirurgicaux, F-80054 Amiens, France
[4] Amiens Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Methodol Biostat Direct Clin Res, Amiens, France
[5] Beauvais Gen Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, 40 Ave Leon Blum, F-60000 Beauvais, France
[6] Amiens Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Hepatectomy; Embolization; Ligature; Portal vein; Liver modulation; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; REMNANT LIVER; INDUCTION; EFFICIENT; RESECTION; FAILURE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-03213-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques, such as right portal vein ligation (RPVL) or right portal vein embolization (RPVE). A few heterogeneous studies have compared these two techniques with contradictory results concerning FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare FLR hypertrophy of the left hemi-liver after RPVL and RPVE.Study designThis was a retrospective comparative study using a propensity score of patients who underwent RPVL or RPVE prior to major hepatectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. The endpoints were FLR growth (%) after weighting using the propensity score, which included FLR prior to surgery and the number of chemotherapy cycles. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the morbidity and mortality, the recourse to other liver hypertrophy procedures, and the number of invasive procedures for the entire oncologic program in intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsFifty-four consecutive patients were retrospectively included and analyzed, 18 in the RPVL group, and 36 in the RPVE group. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After weighting, there was no significant difference between the RPVL and RPVE groups for FLR growth (%), respectively 32.5% [19.3-56.0%] and 34.5% [20.5-47.3%] (p = 0.221). There was no significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes except for the lower number of invasive procedures in RPVL group (median of 2 [2.0, 3.0] in RPVL group and 3 [3.0, 3.0] in RPVE group, p = 0.001)).ConclusionRPVL and RPVE are both effective to provide required left hemi-liver hypertrophy before right hepatectomy. RPVL should be considered for the simultaneous treatment of liver metastases and the primary tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Portal Vein Contribution to the Right and Left Lobes of the Liver Using MRI and CFD
    George, S. M.
    Martin, D. R.
    Giddens, D. P.
    6TH WORLD CONGRESS OF BIOMECHANICS (WCB 2010), PTS 1-3, 2010, 31 : 473 - +
  • [42] Portal Vein Embolization Using a Histoacryl/Lipiodol Mixture before Right Liver Resection
    Bellemann, Nadine
    Stampfl, Ulrike
    Sommer, Christof M.
    Kauczor, Hans-Ulrich
    Schemmer, Peter
    Radeleff, Boris A.
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2012, 29 (03) : 236 - 242
  • [43] Accurate Estimation of Living Donor Right Hemi-Liver Volume from Portal Vein Diameter Measurement and Standard Liver Volume Calculation
    Tongyoo, A.
    Pomfret, E. A.
    Pomposelli, J. J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 12 (05) : 1229 - 1239
  • [44] Future liver remnant hypertrophy and postoperative outcomes: a retrospective comparison between segmental and main right portal vein embolization
    Elif Can
    Aboelyazid Elkilany
    Sophia Paparoditis
    Bernhard Gebauer
    Dominik Geisel
    Felix Krenzien
    Anne Pohrt
    Wibke Uller
    Michael Doppler
    Sebastian Ebel
    Holger Gößmann
    Uli Fehrenbach
    CVIR Endovascular, 8 (1)
  • [45] Left-Liver Hypertrophy After Therapeutic Right-Liver Radioembolization Is Substantial but Less Than After Portal Vein Embolization
    Garlipp, Benjamin
    de Baere, Thierry
    Damm, Robert
    Irmscher, Romy
    van Buskirk, Mark
    Stuebs, Patrick
    Deschamps, Frederic
    Meyer, Frank
    Seidensticker, Ricarda
    Mohnike, Konrad
    Pech, Maciej
    Amthauer, Holger
    Lippert, Hans
    Ricke, Jens
    Seidensticker, Max
    HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 59 (05) : 1864 - 1873
  • [46] ALPPS (in situ split with right portal vein ligation) - where is the perfect niche in multimodality treatment of liver tumors?
    Schnitzbauer, A.
    Bechstein, W.
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 39 : 18 - 18
  • [47] Interventional oncology: new options for interstitial treatments and intravascular approaches - Right hepatic vein embolization after right portal vein embolization for inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant
    Ko, Gi-Young
    Hwang, Shin
    Sung, Kyu-Bo
    Gwon, Dong-Il
    Lee, Sung-Gyu
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2010, 17 (04) : 410 - 412
  • [48] Two-step hepatectomy using right portal vein ligation for multiple bilobar hepatocellular carcinomas arising in injured liver
    Wakai, T
    Shirai, Y
    Hatakeyama, K
    SURGERY, 2005, 137 (01) : 124 - 124
  • [49] Expanding the limits of resectability: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) using monosegment 6, facilitated by an inferior right hepatic vein
    Pineda-Solis, Karen
    Paskar, Dave
    Tun-Abraham, Mauro
    Hernandez-Alejandro, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 115 (08) : 959 - 962
  • [50] Preoperative right portal vein embolization in child A cirrhotic patients. What are the factors affecting left lobe hypertrophy
    Denys, AL
    Schneider, F
    Sibert, A
    Vilgrain, V
    Doenz, F
    Chevallier, P
    RADIOLOGY, 2002, 225 : 221 - 221