Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization

被引:0
|
作者
Werey, Fabien [1 ,2 ]
Dembinski, Jeanne [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Michaud, Audrey [4 ]
Sabbagh, Charles [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mauvais, Francois [5 ]
Yzet, Thierry [2 ,6 ]
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Amiens Univ, Dept Digest Surg, Med Ctr, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
[2] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
[3] Jules Verne Univ Picardie, SSPC UPJV Simplificat Soins Patients Chirurgicaux, F-80054 Amiens, France
[4] Amiens Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Methodol Biostat Direct Clin Res, Amiens, France
[5] Beauvais Gen Hosp, Dept Digest Surg, 40 Ave Leon Blum, F-60000 Beauvais, France
[6] Amiens Univ, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, 1 Rue Prof Christian Cabrol, F-80054 Amiens, France
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Hepatectomy; Embolization; Ligature; Portal vein; Liver modulation; MAJOR HEPATECTOMY; REMNANT LIVER; INDUCTION; EFFICIENT; RESECTION; FAILURE; VOLUME;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-03213-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundIn two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar liver metastases from colorectal cancer, future liver remnant (FLR) growth can be achieved using several techniques, such as right portal vein ligation (RPVL) or right portal vein embolization (RPVE). A few heterogeneous studies have compared these two techniques with contradictory results concerning FLR growth. The objective of this study was to compare FLR hypertrophy of the left hemi-liver after RPVL and RPVE.Study designThis was a retrospective comparative study using a propensity score of patients who underwent RPVL or RPVE prior to major hepatectomy between January 2010 and December 2020. The endpoints were FLR growth (%) after weighting using the propensity score, which included FLR prior to surgery and the number of chemotherapy cycles. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of patients undergoing simultaneous procedures, the morbidity and mortality, the recourse to other liver hypertrophy procedures, and the number of invasive procedures for the entire oncologic program in intention-to-treat analysis.ResultsFifty-four consecutive patients were retrospectively included and analyzed, 18 in the RPVL group, and 36 in the RPVE group. The demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After weighting, there was no significant difference between the RPVL and RPVE groups for FLR growth (%), respectively 32.5% [19.3-56.0%] and 34.5% [20.5-47.3%] (p = 0.221). There was no significant difference regarding the secondary outcomes except for the lower number of invasive procedures in RPVL group (median of 2 [2.0, 3.0] in RPVL group and 3 [3.0, 3.0] in RPVE group, p = 0.001)).ConclusionRPVL and RPVE are both effective to provide required left hemi-liver hypertrophy before right hepatectomy. RPVL should be considered for the simultaneous treatment of liver metastases and the primary tumor.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Right portal vein ligation is still relevant for left hemi-liver hypertrophy: results of a comparative study using a propensity score between right portal vein ligation and embolization
    Fabien Werey
    Jeanne Dembinski
    Audrey Michaud
    Charles Sabbagh
    François Mauvais
    Thierry Yzet
    Jean-Marc Regimbeau
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 409
  • [2] Left hemi-liver hypertrophy after right portal vein ligation versus embolization: A comparative study
    Werey, F.
    Regimbeau, J.
    Dembinski, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2022, 33 : S312 - S312
  • [3] Right Portal Vein Ligation is as Efficient as Portal Vein Embolization to Induce Hypertrophy of the Left Liver Remnant
    B. Aussilhou
    M. Lesurtel
    A. Sauvanet
    O. Farges
    S. Dokmak
    N. Goasguen
    A. Sibert
    V. Vilgrain
    J. Belghiti
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2008, 12 : 297 - 303
  • [4] Right portal vein ligation is as efficient as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant
    Aussilhou, B.
    Lesurtel, M.
    Sauvanet, A.
    Farges, O.
    Dokmak, S.
    Goasguen, N.
    Sibert, A.
    Vilgrain, V.
    Belghiti, J.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2008, 12 (02) : 297 - 303
  • [5] Right portal vein ligation is as effective as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant
    Aussilhou, B.
    Lesurtel, M.
    Dokmak, S.
    Kianmanesh, R.
    Farges, O.
    Sauvanet, A.
    Sibert, A.
    Vilgrain, V.
    Belghiti, J.
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2007, 46 : S72 - S72
  • [6] Failure of right portal vein ligation to induce left lobe hypertrophy due to intrahepatic portoportal collaterals: Successful treatment with portal vein embolization
    Denys, AL
    Abehsera, M
    Sauvanet, A
    Sibert, A
    Belghiti, J
    Menu, Y
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 173 (03) : 633 - 635
  • [7] Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant
    Broering, DC
    Hillert, C
    Krupski, G
    Fischer, L
    Mueller, L
    Achilles, EG
    Esch, JSA
    Rogiers, X
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2002, 6 (06) : 905 - 913
  • [8] Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant
    Dieter C. Broering
    Christian Hillert
    Gerrit Krupski
    Lutz Fischer
    Lars Mueller
    Eike G. Achilles
    Jan Schulte am Esch
    Xavier Rogiers
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2002, 6 : 905 - 913
  • [9] Comparative study of portal vein embolization versus portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the future liver remnant using a mini-pig model
    Wilms, Christian
    Mueller, Lars
    Lenk, Christian
    Wittkugel, Oliver
    Helmke, Knut
    Krupski-Berdien, Gerrit
    Rogiers, Xavier
    Broering, Dieter C.
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 247 (05) : 825 - 834
  • [10] Portal vein embolization vs. portal vein ligation for induction of hypertrophy of the prospective remnant liver volume
    Broering, DC
    Hillert, C
    Krupski, G
    Gundlach, M
    Rogiers, X
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 34 : 32 - 32