Validation of SD Models for the Valuation of Exotic Options in Infrastructure Investment

被引:0
|
作者
Fitch, Gregory J. [1 ]
Odeh, Ibrahim [2 ]
Ibbs, C. William [3 ]
机构
[1] Provident Econ Technol Inc, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, 288 State Rd, Great Barrington, MA 01230 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Dept Civil Engn & Engn Mech, Global Leaders Construct Management, 500 120th St, New York, NY 10027 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 213 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
PROJECTS;
D O I
10.1061/JITSE4.ISENG-2150
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
There has been a significant amount of research related to the valuation of real options that are increasingly complex in terms of payoff structure. In addition, infrastructure procurement is becoming more complex as individual assets are increasingly viewed as being part of a larger network of interdependent systems. In response, this investigation utilizes a System Dynamics (SD) model to capture the relationships between competing assets where simulation results elucidate the causal effects between multiple investments that traverse infrastructure systems. An illustrative case study includes an SD model that simulates historical real-world relationships between water treatment alternatives within the shale gas value chain. This research contributes to the existing body of knowledge by showing how SD models can be used to value multiple types of real options within a portfolio of competing infrastructure assets. The valuation of each investment must consider the value of an underlying asset as well as the compounding effects of competing alternatives. Although this case study is based on water treatment options in the shale gas industry, the same methodology can be used to value real options found in other infrastructure systems.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Investment project valuation based on the fuzzy real options approach
    Liao, Shu-Hsien
    Ho, Shiu-Hwei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGIES AND APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (TAAI 2010), 2010, : 94 - 101
  • [22] SPECIFICATION OF PARAMETERS OF THE INVESTMENT VALUATION OF THE PROJECT ON THE METHOD OF REAL OPTIONS
    Lysak, L. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINING INSTITUTE, 2012, 196 : 185 - 188
  • [23] ANALYZING BIASES IN VALUATION MODELS OF OPTIONS ON FUTURES
    EALES, J
    HAUSER, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 1990, 10 (03) : 211 - 228
  • [24] Stochastic lattice models for valuation of volatility options
    Ma, Jingtang
    Li, Wenyuan
    Han, Xu
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2015, 47 : 93 - 104
  • [25] The use of valuation models by UK investment analysts
    Imam, Shahed
    Barker, Richard
    Clubb, Colin
    [J]. EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 17 (03) : 503 - 535
  • [26] Changing the valuation paradigm to promote adaptive and resilient infrastructure investment: connecting insurance concepts and valuation
    Espinoza, David
    [J]. SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE, 2023, 8 : 33 - 37
  • [27] Options Framework and Valuation of Highway Infrastructure under Real and Financial Uncertainties
    Vasudevan, Vinod
    Prakash, Puneet
    Sahu, Biswajit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2018, 24 (03)
  • [28] Real Options Valuation of Water Infrastructure the Case of Agadir Desalination Plant
    Hajji, Mustapha
    Driss, Ouazar
    El Marzaquioui, Nafila
    [J]. WORLD ENVIRONMENTAL AND WATER RESOURCES CONGRESS 2017: WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, AND WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, : 518 - 529
  • [29] Research on the real options in investment decision ofwaterway infrastructure construction
    Wei, Jin
    [J]. RESOURCES AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-4, 2013, 734-737 : 1617 - 1620
  • [30] An approach to the valuation and decision of ERP investment projects based on real options
    F. Wu
    H. Z. Li
    L. K. Chu
    D. Sculli
    K. Gao
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2009, 168