Genetic analysis of DNA-damage tolerance pathways in Arabidopsis

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Linxiao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Qiuheng [1 ,2 ]
Xiao, Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Capital Normal Univ, Beijing Key Lab DNA Damage Responses, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Normal Univ, Coll Life Sci, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Biochem Microbiol & Immunol, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E5, Canada
关键词
Arabidopsis; Ubiquitination; AtRAD5a; AtUEV1; AtREV3; DNA-damage tolerance; CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN; UBIQUITIN LIGASE; NONCOVALENT INTERACTION; TRANSLESION SYNTHESIS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; STRUCTURAL BASIS; POLYMERASE-ETA; HUMAN SHPRH; REPAIR; PROTEIN;
D O I
10.1007/s00299-022-02942-2
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Key message Genetic analysis revealed a two-branch DNA-damage tolerance mechanism in Arabidopsis, namely translesion DNA synthesis and error-free lesion bypass, represented by Rev3 and Rad5a-Uev1C/D, respectively. DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) is a mechanism by which cells complete replication in the presence of replication-blocking lesions. In budding yeast, DDT is achieved through Rad6-Rad18-mediated monoubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which promotes translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) and is followed by Ubc13-Mms2-Rad5 mediated K63-linked PCNA polyubiquitination that promotes error-free lesion bypass. Arabidopsis and other known plant genomes contain all of the above homologous genes except RAD18, and whether plants possess an intact DDT mechanism is unclear. In this study, we created Arabidopsis UEV1 (homologous to yeast MMS2) gene mutations and obtained two sets of double mutant lines Atuev1ab and Atuev1cd. It turned out that the Atuev1cd, but not the Atuev1ab mutant, was sensitive to DNA damage. Genetic analyses revealed that AtUEV1C/D and AtRAD5a function in the same pathway, while TLS represented by AtREV3 functions in a separate pathway in response to replication-blocking lesions. Furthermore, unlike budding yeast RAD5 that also functions in the TLS pathway, AtRAD5a is not required for TLS. Observations in this study collectively establish a two-branch DDT model in plants with similarity to and difference from the yeast DDT.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 164
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] RasiRNAs hush the DNA-damage response
    不详
    CELL, 2007, 128 (03) : 419 - 419
  • [32] DIFFERENTIAL DNA-DAMAGE DETECTED IN HYBRIDOMAS
    GRIGSBY, RV
    FAIRBAIRN, D
    ONEILL, KL
    HYBRIDOMA, 1993, 12 (06): : 755 - 761
  • [33] Role of epigenetics and DNA-damage in asthma
    Zahiruddin, Adil S.
    Grant, J. Andrew
    Sur, Sanjiv
    CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2018, 18 (01) : 32 - 37
  • [34] PROTEIN-KINASES AND DNA-DAMAGE
    GOTTLIEB, TM
    JACKSON, SP
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 1994, 19 (11) : 500 - 503
  • [35] IRON HOMEOSTASIS AND OXIDATIVE DNA-DAMAGE
    MENEGHINI, R
    BENFATO, MS
    BERTONCINI, CR
    CARVALHO, H
    GURGUEIRA, SA
    ROBALINHO, RL
    TEIXEIRA, HD
    WENDEL, CMA
    NASCIMENTO, ALTO
    CANCER JOURNAL - FRANCE, 1995, 8 (03): : 109 - 113
  • [36] SUPEROXIDE AND THE PRODUCTION OF OXIDATIVE DNA-DAMAGE
    KEYER, K
    GORT, AS
    IMLAY, JA
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1995, 177 (23) : 6782 - 6790
  • [37] A unified view of the DNA-damage checkpoint
    Melo, J
    Toczyski, D
    CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) : 237 - 245
  • [38] ENHANCED MELANOGENESIS AS A RESPONSE TO DNA-DAMAGE
    ELLER, MS
    OSTROM, K
    GILCHREST, BA
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1995, 104 (04) : 581 - 581
  • [39] DNA-damage response - Chewing at the ends
    Alderton, Gemma K.
    NATURE REVIEWS MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY, 2007, 8 (12) : 942+943 - 943
  • [40] The long and short of a DNA-damage response
    Antonio Conconi
    Brendan Bell
    Nature, 2017, 545 : 165 - 166