Towards quantitative in vivo dosimetry using x-ray acoustic computed tomography

被引:4
|
作者
Sun, Leshan [1 ]
Gonzalez, Gilberto [2 ]
Pandey, Prabodh Kumar [3 ]
Wang, Siqi [1 ]
Kim, Kaitlyn [1 ]
Limoli, Charles [4 ]
Chen, Yong [2 ]
Xiang, Liangzhong [1 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Univ Oklahoma, Dept Radiat Oncol, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK 73019 USA
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiol Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Sci 1, Irvine, CA USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Beckman Laser Inst, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA 92617 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
in vivo dosimetry; model-based reconstruction; quantitative acoustic reconstruction; XACT; MODEL-BASED RECONSTRUCTION; RADIOTHERAPY; PROSTATE; WAVES; HEAD;
D O I
10.1002/mp.16476
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
BackgroundRadiation dosimetry is essential for radiation therapy (RT) to ensure that radiation dose is accurately delivered to the tumor. Despite its wide use in clinical intervention, the delivered radiation dose can only be planned and verified via simulation. This makes precision radiotherapy challenging while in-line verification of the delivered dose is still absent in the clinic. X-ray-induced acoustic computed tomography (XACT) has recently been proposed as an imaging tool for in vivo dosimetry. PurposeMost of the XACT studies focus on localizing the radiation beam. However, it has not been studied for its potential for quantitative dosimetry. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using XACT for quantitative in vivo dose reconstruction during radiotherapy. MethodsVarian Eclipse system was used to generate simulated uniform and wedged 3D radiation field with a size of 4 cm x$ \times \ $4 cm. In order to use XACT for quantitative dosimetry measurements, we have deconvoluted the effects of both the x-ray pulse shape and the finite frequency response of the ultrasound detector. We developed a model-based image reconstruction algorithm to quantify radiation dose in vivo using XACT imaging, and universal back-projection (UBP) reconstruction is used as comparison. The reconstructed dose was calibrated before comparing it to the percent depth dose (PDD) profile. Structural similarity index matrix (SSIM) and root mean squared error (RMSE) are used for numeric evaluation. Experimental signals were acquired from 4 cm x$ \times \ $4 cm radiation field created by Linear Accelerator (LINAC) at depths of 6, 8, and 10 cm beneath the water surface. The acquired signals were processed before reconstruction to achieve accurate results. ResultsApplying model-based reconstruction algorithm with non-negative constraints successfully reconstructed accurate radiation dose in 3D simulation study. The reconstructed dose matches well with the PDD profile after calibration in experiments. The SSIMs between the model-based reconstructions and initial doses are over 85%, and the RMSEs of model-based reconstructions are eight times lower than the UBP reconstructions. We have also shown that XACT images can be displayed as pseudo-color maps of acoustic intensity, which correspond to different radiation doses in the clinic. ConclusionOur results show that the XACT imaging by model-based reconstruction algorithm is considerably more accurate than the dose reconstructed by UBP algorithm. With proper calibration, XACT is potentially applicable to the clinic for quantitative in vivo dosimetry across a wide range of radiation modalities. In addition, XACT's capability of real-time, volumetric dose imaging seems well-suited for the emerging field of ultrahigh dose rate "FLASH" radiotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:6894 / 6907
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Quantitative X-ray phase contrast computed tomography with grating interferometry Biomedical applications of quantitative X-ray grating-based phase contrast computed tomography
    Birnbacher, Lorenz
    Braig, Eva-Maria
    Pfeiffer, Daniela
    Pfeiffer, Franz
    Herzen, Julia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (13) : 4171 - 4188
  • [42] Effects of X-Ray Dose On Rhizosphere Studies Using X-Ray Computed Tomography
    Zappala, Susan
    Helliwell, Jonathan R.
    Tracy, Saoirse R.
    Mairhofer, Stefan
    Sturrock, Craig J.
    Pridmore, Tony
    Bennett, Malcolm
    Mooney, Sacha J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (06):
  • [43] Quantitative X-ray tomography
    Maire, E.
    Withers, P. J.
    INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS, 2014, 59 (01) : 1 - 43
  • [44] High spatial resolution x-ray luminescence computed tomography and x-ray fluorescence computed tomography
    Dai, Xianjin
    Sivasubramanian, Kathyayini
    Xing, Lei
    MOLECULAR-GUIDED SURGERY: MOLECULES, DEVICES, AND APPLICATIONS V, 2019, 10862
  • [45] Quantitative Measurement of the Bone Density by X-Ray Micro Computed Tomography
    Binkowski, M.
    Davis, G. R.
    Wrobel, Z.
    Goodship, A. E.
    6TH WORLD CONGRESS OF BIOMECHANICS (WCB 2010), PTS 1-3, 2010, 31 : 856 - +
  • [46] Quantitative wood-adhesive penetration with X-ray computed tomography
    Paris, Jesse L.
    Kamke, Frederick A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADHESION AND ADHESIVES, 2015, 61 : 71 - 80
  • [47] Toward invivo dosimetry in external beam radiotherapy using x-ray acoustic computed tomography: A soft-tissue phantom study validation
    Lei, Hao
    Zhang, Wei
    Oraiqat, Ibrahim
    Liu, Zhipeng
    Ni, Jun
    Wang, Xueding
    El Naqa, Issam
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 45 (09) : 4191 - 4200
  • [48] Impact of photon spectra on the sensitivity of polymer gel dosimetry by X-ray computed tomography
    Hayati H.
    Mesbahi A.
    Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, 2019, 16 (01): : 48 - 55
  • [49] Investigation of optimal scanning protocol for X-ray computed tomography polymer gel dosimetry
    Sellakumar, P.
    Samuel, E. James Jebaseelan
    Supe, Sanjay S.
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION B-BEAM INTERACTIONS WITH MATERIALS AND ATOMS, 2007, 264 (02): : 395 - 399
  • [50] Industrial X-ray computed tomography
    Pechstein, Torsten
    TM-TECHNISCHES MESSEN, 2020, 87 (02) : 79 - 80