Cooperation choice in an online low-carbon supply chain

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Guozheng [1 ]
Xu, Xinxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ Light Ind, Coll Econ & Management, 136 Sci Ave,High Tech Ind Dev Zone, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
关键词
Low-carbon supply chain; online sales; cooperation strategy; agency selling; reselling; game theory; CONSUMER; PRODUCT; CHANNEL; PERCEPTIONS; COMPETITION; STRATEGY; DECISIONS; PROMOTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1051/ro/2023193
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper considers the cooperation strategies in an Online Selling Low-Carbon Supply Chain (OSLCSC). The manufacturer in OSLCSC establishes an online retailing channel based on a co-operative agency sales format. Three possible online collaboration strategies are considered. We analyze the final cooperative equilibrium and find that cooperation between the platform and manufacturer can promote the dual development of environmental benefit and over-all supply chain profit. But from an individual benefit perspective, the platform and manufacturer do not always have motivation to cooperate with each other, and it related to the revenue-sharing rate and market competition intensity. Furthermore, we reveal that non-cooperation strategy does not always lead to the worst outcome, and in some cases, cooperation between the retailer and platform will result in the lowest entire supply chain performance. Lastly, the results show that each cooperative strategy may be the ultimate equilibrium, and the three players in OSLCSC could achieve a Pareto optimal under the different cooperation strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 326
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Revenue sharing contract of low-carbon service supply chain under carbon trading and consumers' low-carbon preference
    Liu, Zhen
    Song, Han
    Dai, Ying
    Peng, Wei
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2022, 28 (01): : 294 - 306
  • [22] Optimal channel choices and online refund policies in a low-carbon tourism supply chain considering carbon reduction level
    Xu, Yuqiu
    Cao, Qianqian
    Cao, Kaiying
    Wang, Jia
    INFOR, 2023, 61 (01) : 34 - 66
  • [23] Financing decisions of low-carbon supply Chain under Chain-to-Chain competition
    Xia, Tongshui
    Wang, Yuyan
    Lv, Lingxue
    Shen, Liang
    Cheng, T. C. E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2023, 61 (18) : 6153 - 6176
  • [24] Operational strategies in a low-carbon supply chain considering the impact of carbon credit
    Zhang, Yan
    Yang, Ruiju
    Shi, Xiao
    Zhang, Wen
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 442
  • [25] Which Is the Best Supply Chain Policy: Carbon Tax, or a Low-Carbon Subsidy?
    Wu, Hanbo
    Sun, Yaxin
    Su, Yutong
    Chen, Ming
    Zhao, Hongxia
    Li, Qi
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (10)
  • [26] Low-carbon supply chain operations: impacts of carbon tax and fairness concerns
    Shi, Song
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOW-CARBON TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 17 : 1239 - 1253
  • [27] Comparative study of low-carbon supply chain carbon emission reduction decisions considering low-carbon policies and power structures
    Qiu, Jun
    Yang, Yuxiang
    Jisuanji Jicheng Zhizao Xitong/Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, CIMS, 2024, 30 (07): : 2566 - 2587
  • [28] Designing Buy-Online-and-Pick-Up-in-Store (BOPS) Contract of Dual-Channel Low-Carbon Supply Chain considering Consumers' Low-Carbon Preference
    Zhang, Yang
    Li, Jingyi
    Xu, Bing
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 2020
  • [29] Optimal Decisions in Green, Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering the Competition and Cooperation Relationships between Different Types of Manufacturers
    Zhang, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Wantong
    Wang, Min
    Zhang, Dalin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (22)
  • [30] production decision and coordination of low-carbon closed-loop supply chain considering power structures and equity cooperation
    Sun J.-Y.
    Yang L.
    Zhang Y.
    Yao F.-M.
    Kongzhi yu Juece/Control and Decision, 2024, 39 (02): : 669 - 679