Improving biocompatibility for next generation of metallic implants

被引:157
|
作者
Bandyopadhyay, Amit [1 ]
Mitra, Indranath [1 ]
Goodman, Stuart B. [2 ]
Kumar, Mukesh [3 ]
Bose, Susmita [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington State Univ, Sch Mech & Mat Engn, WM Keck Biomed Mat Res Lab, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr, Redwood City, CA 94063 USA
[3] Lincotek Med, Bartlett, TN USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Implants; Metals; Alloys; Biocompatibility; 3D printing; Additive manufacturing; CALCIUM-PHOSPHATE COATINGS; BETA-TRICALCIUM-PHOSPHATE; IN-VIVO DEGRADATION; TI-NB-ZR; TITANIUM-TANTALUM ALLOY; POROUS NICKEL-TITANIUM; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; BONE INGROWTH; HYDROXYAPATITE COATINGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.101053
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The increasing need for joint replacement surgeries, musculoskeletal repairs, and orthodontics worldwide prompts emerging technologies to evolve with healthcare's changing landscape. Metallic orthopaedic materials have a shared application history with the aerospace industry, making them only partly efficient in the biomedical domain. However, suitability of metallic materials in bone tissue replacements and regenerative therapies remains unchallenged due to their superior mechanical properties, eventhough they are not perfectly biocompatible. Therefore, exploring ways to improve biocompatibility is the most critical step toward designing the next generation of metallic biomaterials. This review discusses methods of improving biocompatibility of metals used in biomedical devices using surface modification, bulk modification, and incorporation of biologics. Our investigation spans multiple length scales, from bulk metals to the effect of microporosities, surface nanoarchitecture, and biomolecules such as DNA incorporation for enhanced biological response in metallic materials. We examine recent technologies such as 3D printing in alloy design and storing surface charge on nanoarchitecture surfaces, metal-onmetal, and ceramic-on-metal coatings to present a coherent and comprehensive understanding of the subject. Finally, we consider the advantages and challenges of metallic biomaterials and identify future directions.
引用
收藏
页数:36
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF SILICONE IMPLANTS
    HEGGERS, JP
    KOSSOVSKY, N
    PARSONS, RW
    ROBSON, MC
    PELLEY, RP
    RAINE, TJ
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1983, 11 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [22] BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF IMPLANTS - REPLY
    MORSCHER, EW
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1992, 74 (05): : 789 - 789
  • [23] Novel double layer hydroxyapatite (HA)/Ti coating for biocompatibility improvement of metallic implants
    Fathi, MH
    Salehi, M
    Saatchi, A
    Mortazavi, V
    Moosavi, SB
    SURFACE ENGINEERING, 2001, 17 (06) : 459 - 464
  • [24] Biocompatibility, meeting a key functional requirement of next generation medical devices
    Helmus, MN
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 229 : U1109 - U1109
  • [25] MULTI-METALLIC COMPLEXES - THE NEXT GENERATION OF DRIERS
    BELLETTIERE, SJ
    MAHONEY, DM
    JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 59 (752): : 101 - 108
  • [26] Improving the next generation of bioartificial liver devices
    Allen, JW
    Bhatia, SN
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (06) : 447 - 454
  • [28] Laser surface remelting of Ti and its alloys for improving surface biocompatibility of orthopaedic implants
    Mukherjee, Sumanta
    Dhara, Santanu
    Saha, Partha
    MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 33 (02) : 106 - 118
  • [29] POLYMER SURFACES AND BIOCOMPATIBILITY OF IMPLANTS
    LYMAN, DJ
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1979, (APR): : 131 - 131
  • [30] Biocompatibility and the efficacy of medical implants
    Shard, Alexander G.
    Tomlins, Paul E.
    REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 1 (06) : 789 - 800