Statins for primary prevention in multimorbid patients: to prescribe or not to prescribe? A qualitative analysis of general practitioners' decision-making processes

被引:1
|
作者
Onaisi, Racha [1 ]
Bezzazi, Anais [2 ]
Berthouin, Thomas [2 ]
Boulet, Justine [2 ]
Hasselgard-Rowe, Jennifer [3 ]
Maisonneuve, Hubert [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bordeaux, Dept Gen Practice, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
[2] Univ Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Univ Coll Gen Med, Lyon, France
[3] Univ Geneva, Inst Global Hlth, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Univ Inst Primary Care, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[5] Univ Geneva, Univ Inst Primary Care, Fac Med, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
关键词
cardiovascular prevention; clinical reasoning; decision aid; decision making; shared decision making; statin; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmad068
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction A better understanding of the determinants involved in general practitioners' (GPs) decision-making processes when it comes to prescribing statins as primary prevention in patients with multimorbidity could provide insights for improving implementation of primary prevention guidelines. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using a deductive framework-based and inductive analysis of GPs' semi-structured interviews verbatim, from which expertise profiles of prescribers were also drawn. The analytical framework was built from a pragmatic synthesis of the evidence-based medicine, Modelling using Typified Objects (MOT) model of clinical reasoning processes, Theoretical Domains Framework, and shared decision-making frameworks. Results Fifteen GPs were interviewed between June 2019 and January 2020. Diabetes seemed to represent a specific motivation for deciding about statin prescription for primary prevention purposes; and in situations of multimorbidity, GPs differentiated between cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular multimorbidity. Expert prescribers seemed to have integrated the utilisation of cardiovascular risk calculation scores throughout their practice, whereas non-expert prescribers considered them difficult to interpret and preferred using more of a "rule of thumb" process. One interviewee used the risk calculation score as a support for discussing statin prescription with the patient. Conclusion Our results shed light on the reasons why statins remain under-prescribed for primary prevention and why non-diabetic multimorbid patients have even lower odds of being prescribed a statin. They call for a change in the use of risk assessment scores, by placing them as decision aids, to support and improve personalised shared decision-making discussions as an efficient approach to improve the implementation of recommendations about statins for primary prevention.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] General practitioners' decision-making process to prescribe pain medicines for low back pain: a qualitative study
    Ferreira, Giovanni E.
    Zadro, Joshua
    Jones, Caitlin
    Ayre, Julie
    Lin, Christine
    Richards, Bethan
    Needs, Christopher
    Shaheed, Christina Abdel
    Mclachlan, Andrew
    Day, Richard O.
    Maher, Christopher
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [2] Number of patients needed to prescribe statins in primary cardiovascular prevention: mirage and reality
    Rossignol, Michel
    Labrecque, Michel
    Cauchon, Michel
    Breton, Marie-Claude
    Poirier, Paul
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 35 (04) : 376 - 382
  • [3] A decision-making tool to prescribe knee orthoses in daily practice for patients with osteoarthritis
    Coudeyre, Emmanuel
    Nguyen, Christelle
    Chabaud, Aurore
    Pereira, Bruno
    Beaudreuil, Johann
    Coudreuse, Jean-Marie
    Deat, Philippe
    Sailhan, Frederic
    Lorenzo, Alain
    Rannou, Francois
    [J]. ANNALS OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2018, 61 (02) : 92 - 98
  • [4] Roles of general practitioners in shared decision-making for patients with cancer: A qualitative study
    Abma, Inger L.
    Roelofs, Lianne C. G.
    van der Kolk, Marion B.
    Mulder, Sasja F.
    Schers, Henk J.
    Hermens, Rosella P. M. G.
    van der Wees, Philip J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (04)
  • [5] Primary Prevention with Statins: Strategies to Support Shared Decision-Making
    Spatz E.S.
    Montori V.M.
    [J]. Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports, 2017, 11 (10)
  • [6] A Qualitative Exploration of General Practitioners' Treatment Decision-Making for Depressive Symptoms
    Stallman, Alex
    Sheeran, Nicola
    Boschen, Mark
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2023, 43 (04) : 498 - 507
  • [7] General Practitioners' Decision Making about Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Older Adults: A Qualitative Study
    Jansen, Jesse
    McKinn, Shannon
    Bonner, Carissa
    Irwig, Les
    Doust, Jenny
    Glasziou, Paul
    Bell, Katy
    Naganathan, Vasi
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (01):
  • [8] General practitioners' views on shared decision making: a qualitative analysis
    Stevenson, FA
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 291 - 293
  • [9] METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF QUALITATIVE-QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF DECISION-MAKING PROCESSES
    Gawlik, Remigiusz
    [J]. MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2016, 7 (02) : 3 - 11
  • [10] Statins for Primary Prevention in Older Adults-Moving Toward Evidence-Based Decision-Making
    Singh, Sonal
    Zieman, Susan
    Go, Alan S.
    Fortmann, Stephen P.
    Wenger, Nanette K.
    Fleg, Jerome L.
    Radziszewska, Barbara
    Stone, Neil J.
    Zoungas, Sophia
    Gurwitz, Jerry H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 (11) : 2188 - 2196