2D and 3D Modelling Strategies to Reproduce the Response of Historical Masonry Buildings Subjected to Settlements

被引:0
|
作者
Prosperi, Alfonso [1 ,3 ]
Longo, Michele [1 ]
Korswagen, Paul A. [1 ]
Korff, Mandy [1 ,2 ]
Rots, Jan G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Geosci & Engn, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 Delft, Netherlands
基金
荷兰研究理事会;
关键词
damage; masonry structures; numerical modelling; settlements; DAMAGE;
D O I
10.1080/15583058.2024.2325472
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this study, 2D and 3D modelling strategies are used to represent the behaviour of historical masonry buildings on strip foundations undergoing settlements. The application focuses on a two-story building, typical of the Dutch architectural heritage. An improved 2D modelling is presented: It includes the effect of the lateral walls to replicate the response of the detailed 3D models. The masonry strip foundation is modelled and supported by a no-tension interface, which represents the soil-foundation interaction. Two settlement configurations, hogging and sagging, are applied to the models, and their intensity is characterized using their angular distortion. The improved 2D model that includes the stiffness and weight of the lateral walls agrees in terms of displacements, stress and damage with the detailed 3D models. Conversely, the simplified 2D facade models without lateral walls exhibit different cracking, and damage from 2 to 7 times lower at an applied angular distortion of 2 parts per thousand (1/500). The improved 2D model requires less computational and modelling burden, resulting in analyses from 9 to 40 times faster than the 3D models. The results prove the importance of identifying and including the 3D effects that affect the response of structures subjected to settlements.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning grouping strategies for 2D and 3D object recognition
    Draper, BA
    [J]. IMAGE UNDERSTANDING WORKSHOP, 1996 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I AND II, 1996, : 1447 - 1454
  • [22] Combination strategies for 2D features to recognize 3D gestures
    Aran, Oya
    Akarun, Lale
    [J]. 2006 IEEE 14TH SIGNAL PROCESSING AND COMMUNICATIONS APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 758 - +
  • [23] On strategies and automation in upgrading 2D to 3D landscape representations
    Prechtel, Nikolas
    [J]. CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2015, 42 (03) : 244 - 258
  • [24] Low temperature thermochronology and strategies for multiple samples 2: Partition modelling for 2D/3D distributions with discontinuities
    Stephenson, J
    Gallagher, K
    Holmes, CC
    [J]. EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2006, 241 (3-4) : 557 - 570
  • [25] 2D or not 2D That is the Question, but 3D is the, answer
    Cronin, Paul
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2007, 14 (07) : 769 - 771
  • [26] Resistance Modelling in 1D, 2D, and 3D for substrate networks
    Kagganti, Shiva P.
    Kristiansson, Simon
    Ingvarson, Fredrik
    Jeppson, Kjell O.
    [J]. PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2004, T114 : 217 - 222
  • [27] AUTOMATIC PROCEDURAL 3D MODELLING OF BUILDINGS
    Zupan, Robert
    Zupan, Katarina
    Franges, Stanislav
    Vinkovic, Adam
    [J]. TEHNICKI GLASNIK-TECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (03): : 166 - 173
  • [28] Modelling magnetic exchange springs in 1D, 2D, and 3D
    Bowden, G. J.
    Martin, K. N.
    Rainford, B. D.
    de Groot, P. A. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICS-CONDENSED MATTER, 2008, 20 (01)
  • [29] 3D printing of masonry structures for centrifuge modelling
    Ritter, S.
    DeJong, M. J.
    Giardina, G.
    Mair, R. J.
    [J]. PHYSICAL MODELLING IN GEOTECHNICS, VOL 1, 2018, : 449 - 454
  • [30] 3D and 2D/3D holograms model
    A. A. Boriskevich
    V. K. Erohovets
    V. V. Tkachenko
    [J]. Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 2012, 21 (4) : 242 - 248