Evaluation and Measurement Properties of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Home Dialysis

被引:0
|
作者
Rivara, Matthew B. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Prince, David K. [1 ]
Leuther, Kerstin K. [3 ]
Hussein, Wael F. [3 ,4 ]
Mehrotra, Rajnish [1 ,2 ]
Edwards, Todd [5 ]
Schiller, Brigitte [3 ,4 ]
Patrick, Donald L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Kidney Res Inst, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Satellite Healthcare Inc, San Jose, CA USA
[4] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Palo Alto, CA USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Syst & Populat Hlth, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Univ Washington, Kidney Res Inst, Div Nephrol, 325 Ninth Ave,Box 359606, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
关键词
chronic dialysis; hemodialysis; peritoneal dialysis; HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS; CONSUMER ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.0000000000000429
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background No previously validated patient-reported experience measures exist for use among patients undergoing home dialysis. We tested the Home Dialysis Care Experience survey, a newly developed 26-item experience measure, among patients from 30 dialysis facilities in the United States. Methods Using mail and telephone survey modalities, we approached 1372 patients treated with peritoneal dialysis or home hemodialysis for participation. Using the results from completed surveys, we evaluated item calibration by assessing item floor and ceiling effects. We tested three sets of composite scores and used factor analysis to assess model fit for each. We evaluated associations of composite scores with global ratings and separately with patient and dialysis facility characteristics. Finally, we measured test-retest reliability in patients who completed the survey at two separate time points. Results Overall, 495 eligible patients completed at least one survey (response rate 36%). Of these, 49 completed the survey in Spanish and 61 completed a second survey within 30 days. We did not detect significant floor or ceiling effects, except for one item that demonstrated >90% responses at the top response option. Analyses supported one 12-item composite scale with high internal consistency reliability: Quality of Home Dialysis Care and Operations (Cronbach alpha=0.85). This scale strongly correlated with overall staff rating (r=0.73) and overall center rating (r=0.70). Patient demographic and dialysis facility characteristics were not consistently associated with composite scale scores or overall staff or center ratings. Intraclass correlation coefficients in the test-retest population were 0.74 for the Quality scale, 0.88 for overall staff rating, and 0.90 for overall center rating. Conclusions The Home Dialysis Care Experience survey is a 26-item measure that includes one composite scale and two global rating scores and is an informative tool to evaluate patient experience of care for home dialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 609
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Choosing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure
    McClimans, Leah M.
    Browne, John P.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 : 125 - 125
  • [22] Patient-reported measure of knee function
    Marx, RG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (08): : 1199 - 1199
  • [23] Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the patient-reported experience measure for addiction treatment (PREMAT-NL)
    Migchels, Charlotte
    van den Brink, Wim
    Zerrouk, Amine
    Matthys, Frieda
    De Ruysscher, Clara
    Vanderplasschen, Wouter
    Crunelle, Cleo L.
    [J]. DRUG AND ALCOHOL REVIEW, 2024,
  • [24] Psychometric evaluation of an experience sampling method-based patient-reported outcome measure in functional dyspepsia
    Klaassen, Tim
    Smeets, Fabienne G. M.
    Vork, Lisa
    Tack, Jan
    Talley, Nicholas J.
    Simren, Magnus
    Aziz, Qasim
    Ford, Alexander C.
    Kruimel, Joanna W.
    Conchillo, Jose M.
    Leue, Carsten
    Masclee, Adrian A. M.
    Keszthelyi, Daniel
    [J]. NEUROGASTROENTEROLOGY AND MOTILITY, 2021, 33 (09):
  • [25] Choosing a patient-reported outcome measure
    Leah M. McClimans
    John Browne
    [J]. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 2011, 32 : 47 - 60
  • [26] Patient-reported outcome measurement in upper blepharoplasty: How to measure what the patient sees
    Herruer, J. M.
    Prins, J. B.
    van Heerbeek, N.
    Verhage-Damen, G. W. J. A.
    Ingels, K. J. A. O.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (09): : 1346 - 1351
  • [27] Evaluation of Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Rhinoplasty A Systematic Review
    van Zijl, Floris V. W. J.
    Mokkink, L. B.
    Haagsma, J. A.
    Datema, Frank R.
    [J]. JAMA FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2019, 21 (02) : 152 - 162
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measurement
    Goodare, Heather
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2010, 103 (07) : 264 - 264
  • [29] Measurement properties of a patient-reported outcome measure assessing psoriasis severity: The psoriasis symptoms and signs diary
    Mathias, Susan D.
    Feldman, Steven R.
    Crosby, Ross D.
    Colwell, Hilary H.
    McQuarrie, Kelly
    Han, Chenglong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2016, 27 (04) : 322 - 327
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures for medication treatment satisfaction: a systematic review of measure development and measurement properties
    Yang, Mengting
    Zhang, Puwen
    Halladay, Jillian
    Zou, Kun
    Choonara, Imti
    Ji, Xiaorui
    Zhang, Shuya
    Yan, Weiyi
    Huang, Liang
    Lu, Xiaoxi
    Wang, Huiqing
    Jiang, Yuxin
    Liu, Xinyu
    Zeng, Linan
    Zhang, Lingli
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01):