Development and validation of a delirium care critical-thinking scale for intensive care unit nurses: A mixed-method study

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Yu-Ling [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Ming-Ju [2 ,3 ]
Pan, Ching-, I [4 ]
Shang, Shu-Ting [1 ,5 ]
Tsai, Yun-Fang [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Nursing, 259,Wenhua 1st Rd, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
[2] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Keelung, Dept Nursing, Keelung, Taiwan
[5] Linkou Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Nursing, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[6] Gung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Nursing, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Keelung, Dept Psychiat, Keelung, Taiwan
关键词
critical thinking; delirium; Delphi method; instrument development; intensive care nursing; intensive care unit; psychometric assessment; GUIDELINES; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.16997
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aim and ObjectivesTo develop a Delirium Care Critical-Thinking Scale for nurses caring for patients in the intensive care unit and examine the scale's psychometric properties.BackgroundThere is a tool to evaluate nurses' critical thinking skills to determine nursing competency when delirium care is required.DesignThis cross-sectional, mixed-methods study.MethodsThe Delphi method was applied for collection and analysis of data during conceptualization and item generation of the tool (Phase I). Item analysis, assessment of validity and reliability of the scale (Phase II) involved 318 nurses recruited by convenience sampling from nine adult intensive care units in medicine and surgery at one medical centre. Confirmatory factor analysis assessed construct validity. Internal consistency and 2-week test-retest stability measured reliability. A Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory Scale examined concurrent validity.ResultsAfter three rounds, the Delphi method resulted in 31 scale items. Item analysis demonstrated construct reliability ranged from 9.23 to 16.18. Confirmatory factor analysis eliminated one item and extracted five factors: applying knowledge, confirming the problem and accuracy of information, reasoning logically, choosing appropriate strategies and remaining open-minded. Average variance extracted values of all factors indicated good convergent validity. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency was .96 with good test-retest reliability. The correlation coefficient for concurrent validity was .301.ConclusionThe new Delirium Care Critical-Thinking Scale for intensive care nurses was demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating their ability to assess patients with delirium.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThis new scale could be used to assess outcomes of education interventions and the effectiveness of nursing care quality involving patients with delirium in intensive and critical care units.Reporting MethodThe COSMIN checklist was used as the reporting guideline for this study.Patient or Public ContributionNone.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1397
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Are intensive care nurses really superior to the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) in detecting delirium?
    Spronk, Peter E.
    Riekerk-Grul, Bea
    Hofhuis, Jose G. M.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE AND RESUSCITATION, 2012, 14 (01) : 89 - 89
  • [22] Critical care nurses' experiences of grief in an adult intensive care unit
    Shorter, Melanie
    Stayt, Louise Caroline
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2010, 66 (01) : 159 - 167
  • [23] Examination of the psychological changes in nurses due to workload in an intensive care unit: a mixed method study
    Turan, Nazan
    Ancel, Gulsum
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2020, 56 (02) : 171 - 184
  • [24] Delirium in intensive care: use of the 'Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit' by the nurse
    Gomes de Oliveira Tostes, Isabel Cristina
    Maciqueira Pereira, Sandra Regina
    de Almeida, Luana Ferreira
    dos Santos, Manasses Moura
    [J]. REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2018, 10 (01): : 2 - 8
  • [25] Comparison of delirium assessment tools in a mixed intensive care unit
    van Eijk, Maarten M. J.
    van Marum, Rob J.
    Klijn, Ine A. M.
    de Wit, Nelleke
    Kesecioglu, Jozef
    Slooter, Arjen J. C.
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (06) : 1881 - 1885
  • [26] Attitudes and Beliefs of Trainees and Nurses Regarding Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit
    Scott Richard Beach
    Donna T. Chen
    Jeff C. Huffman
    [J]. Academic Psychiatry, 2013, 37 : 436 - 438
  • [27] The training needs of Korean intensive care unit nurses regarding delirium
    Roh, Young Sook
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2021, 62
  • [28] Attitudes and Beliefs of Trainees and Nurses Regarding Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit
    Beach, Scott Richard
    Chen, Donna T.
    Huffman, Jeff C.
    [J]. ACADEMIC PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 37 (06) : 436 - 438
  • [29] Nurses' and physicians' perceptions of Confusion Assessment Method for the intensive care unit for delirium detection: focus group study
    Oxenboll-Collet, Marie
    Egerod, Ingrid
    Christensen, Vibeke
    Jensen, Jeannette
    Thomsen, Thordis
    [J]. NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 23 (01) : 16 - 22
  • [30] Intensive Care Unit Nurses' Beliefs About Delirium Assessment and Management
    Oosterhouse, Kimberly J.
    Vincent, Catherine
    Foreman, Marquis D.
    Gruss, Valerie A.
    Corte, Colleen
    Berger, Barbara
    [J]. AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 27 (04) : 379 - 393