Urbanisation and agricultural intensification modulate plant-pollinator network structure and robustness

被引:5
|
作者
Proesmans, Willem [1 ]
Felten, Emeline [1 ]
Laurent, Emilien [1 ]
Albrecht, Matthias [2 ]
Cyrille, Nathan [1 ,3 ]
Labonte, Audrey [1 ]
Maurer, Corina [2 ]
Paxton, Robert [4 ]
Schweiger, Oliver [5 ]
Szentgyoergyi, Hajnalka [6 ]
Vanbergen, Adam J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bourgogne Franche Comte, Univ Bourgogne, Inst Agro, Agroecol,INRAE, Dijon, France
[2] Agroscope, Agroecol & Environm, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Bourgogne, Biogeosci, CNRS, UMR 6282, Dijon, France
[4] Martin Luther Univ Halle Wittenberg, Inst Biol, Gen Zool, Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[5] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Halle An Der Saale, Germany
[6] Jagiellonian Univ, Inst Bot, Fac Biol, Krakow, Poland
关键词
bees; bipartite networks; extinction cascade; flower visitors; land use; landscape structure; Nestedness; SCM; SPECIALIZATION; BIODIVERSITY; ARCHITECTURE; NESTEDNESS; TOLERANCE; CROPS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2435.14503
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Land use change is a major pressure on pollinator abundance, diversity and plant-pollinator interactions. Far less is known about how land-use alters the structure of plant-pollinator networks and their robustness to plant-pollinator coextinctions.We analysed the structure of plant-pollinator networks sampled in 12 landscapes along an urbanisation and agricultural intensity gradient, from early spring to late summer 2021, and used a stochastic coextinction model to correlate plant-pollinator coextinction risk with network structure (species and network-level metrics) and landscape context.Networks in intensively managed (i.e., agricultural and urban) landscapes had a lower risk of initiating a coextinction cascade, while networks in less intensively managed landscapes may be less robust. Network structure modulated the frequency and severity of coextinctions and species loss, while the strength of species interactions increased robustness.Urban networks were more species rich and symmetrical due to the high diversity of ornamental plants, while intensively managed agricultural landscapes had smaller, more tightly connected and nested networks.Network structure modulated the frequency of extinctions, which was decreased by greater linkage density, interaction asymmetry and interaction dependence in the networks, while once an extinction occurred, nestedness and linkage density propagated the degree of the coextinction cascade and species loss. At the species level, species strength was inversely correlated with extinction risk, implying that generalist species with a high number of interactions with specialists had the lowest extinction risk.An interplay between land-use and network structure affects community robustness to coextinctions with implications for pollination services and plant reproduction. Land-use change or other global change pressures by reorganising species interactions can alter communities and their potential functioning.Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.image
引用
收藏
页码:628 / 641
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Anthropogenic intensification on plant-pollinator interactions over four decades in Chile: a spatiotemporal assessment
    Guimaraes, Barbara Matos da Cunha
    Marinho, Rafaela Cabral
    Carvallo, Gaston O.
    Maruyama, Pietro K.
    Murua, Maureen M.
    Rech, Andre Rodrigo
    Vieli, Lorena
    Oliveira, Paulo E.
    Fonturbel, Francisco E.
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [42] The effects of the decline of a keystone plant species on a dune community plant-pollinator network
    Sandacz, Dan
    Vitt, Pati
    Knight, Tiffany M. M.
    CaraDonna, Paul
    Havens, Kayri
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [43] Local and regional processes drive distance decay in structure in a spatial multilayer plant-pollinator network
    Vitali, Agustin
    Goldstein, Maya
    Markfeld, Matan
    Pilosof, Shai
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2024, 93 (10) : 1582 - 1592
  • [44] Patterns of introduced species interactions affect multiple aspects of network structure in plant-pollinator communities
    Russo, Laura
    Memmott, Jane
    Montoya, Daniel
    Shea, Katriona
    Buckley, Yvonne M.
    ECOLOGY, 2014, 95 (10) : 2953 - 2963
  • [45] Plant-pollinator networks in grassland working landscapes reveal seasonal shifts in network structure and composition
    Bendel, Cayla R.
    Kral-O'Brien, Katherine C.
    Hovick, Torre J.
    Limb, Ryan F.
    Harmon, Jason P.
    ECOSPHERE, 2019, 10 (01):
  • [46] Interaction frequency, network position, and the temporal persistence of interactions in a plant-pollinator network
    Chacoff, Natacha P.
    Resasco, Julian
    Vazquez, Diego P.
    ECOLOGY, 2018, 99 (01) : 21 - 28
  • [47] THE REPRODUCTIVE-BIOLOGY OF RASPBERRIES AND PLANT-POLLINATOR COMMUNITY STRUCTURE
    WHITNEY, GG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1984, 71 (07) : 887 - 894
  • [48] Variation in Plant-Pollinator Network Structure along the Elevational Gradient of the San Francisco Peaks, Arizona
    Chesshire, Paige R.
    McCabe, Lindsie M.
    Cobb, Neil S.
    INSECTS, 2021, 12 (12)
  • [49] Mapping trait versus species turnover reveals spatiotemporal variation in functional redundancy and network robustness in a plant-pollinator community
    Cantwell-Jones, Aoife
    Larson, Keith
    Ward, Alan
    Bates, Olivia K.
    Cox, Tara
    Gibbons, Charlotte
    Richardson, Ryan
    Al-Hayali, Abdullah M. R.
    Svedin, Johan
    Aronsson, Max
    Brannlund, Frida
    Tylianakis, Jason M.
    Johansson, Jacob
    Gill, Richard J.
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2023, 37 (03) : 748 - 762
  • [50] Plant-pollinator network architecture does not impact intraspecific microbiome variability
    Smith, Gordon P.
    Cohen, Hamutahl
    Zorn, Jocelyn F.
    McFrederick, Quinn S.
    Ponisio, Lauren C.
    MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2024, 33 (07)