Outcomes of subsequent abdominal operations after an initial ventral hernia repair

被引:1
|
作者
Hayden, Anna [1 ]
Worth, Samantha [1 ]
Kothari, Brittany [2 ]
Keller, Weston [3 ]
Mcgill, Emily [2 ]
Blackhurst, Dawn [3 ]
Cobb, William S. [4 ]
Carbonell, Alfredo M. [4 ]
Warren, Jeremy A. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med, Greenville, SC USA
[2] Prisma Hlth Dept Surg, Summer Program Undergrad Res Surg, Greenville, SC USA
[3] Prisma Hlth Dept Surg, Greenville, SC USA
[4] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med Greenville, Prisma Hlth Dept Surg, Greenville, SC USA
[5] Univ South Carolina, Sch Med Greenville, Div Minimal Access Surg, Prisma Hlth Upstate,Dept Surg, 701 Grove Rd,Support Tower 3, Greenville, SC 29605 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY | 2023年 / 226卷 / 06期
关键词
Subsequent abdominal operation; Ventral hernia repair; Abdominal wall reconstruction; Mesh; MESH; COMPLICATIONS; RECURRENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2023.07.044
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: Nearly 20% of ventral hernia repair (VHR) patients require a subsequent abdominal operation (SAO), and mesh position may impact the complexity and outcome of the SAO. Methods: Retrospective review of VHR with mesh from 2006 to 2020 from an internal database and the ACHQC. Primary outcomes measured incidence, complexity, and complications of SAO relative to mesh position. Results: SAO was required in 433 of 2539 (17.1%) patients, totaling 671 operations; 197/893 (22.1%) with intraperitoneal mesh (IPM) and 236/1646 (14.3%) with extraperitoneal mesh (EPM; p < 0.001). SAO was directly related to VHR in 180 (232 total SAOs) and unrelated in 253 (439 total SAOs). There were no significant differences in complications after SAO between IPM and EPM, nor any difference in adhesion complexity. Conclusion: Incidence of SAO is higher with IPM, but surgical outcomes are similar. Due to the risk of secondary mesh infection with IPM, significantly more of these were removed at the time of SAO.
引用
收藏
页码:896 / 900
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
    M. Rosen
    F. Brody
    J. Ponsky
    R.M. Walsh
    S. Rosenblatt
    F. Duperier
    A. Fanning
    A. Siperstein
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2003, 17 : 123 - 128
  • [42] National results after ventral hernia repair
    Helgstrand, Frederik
    DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 63 (07):
  • [43] Patient reported outcomes after incisional hernia repair-establishing the ventral hernia recurrence inventory
    Baucom, Rebeccah B.
    Ousley, Jenny
    Feurer, Irene D.
    Beveridge, Gloria B.
    Pierce, Richard A.
    Holzman, Michael D.
    Sharp, Kenneth W.
    Poulose, Benjamin K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 212 (01): : 81 - 88
  • [44] RECTUS REPAIR FOR MIDLINE VENTRAL ABDOMINAL-WALL HERNIA
    NARAYNSINGH, V
    ARIYANAYAGAM, D
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 80 (05) : 614 - 615
  • [45] REPAIR OF VENTRAL ABDOMINAL HERNIA IN A HORSE, USING TANTALUM MESH
    HAMILTON, DP
    NELSON, DR
    HARDENBROOK, HJ
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1974, 164 (12): : 1204 - 1205
  • [46] Use of a Rat Model to Study Ventral Abdominal Hernia Repair
    Suckow, Mark A.
    Boynton, Felicia D. Duke
    Johnson, Chad
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2017, (128):
  • [47] Laparoscopic repair of a traumatic ventral abdominal hernia using a mesh
    Rijkenhuizen, ABM
    EQUINE VETERINARY EDUCATION, 2005, 17 (05) : 243 - 247
  • [48] A TECHNIQUE FOR INCREASING ABDOMINAL CAPACITY IN THE REPAIR OF MASSIVE VENTRAL HERNIA
    HANDELSMAN, JC
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1959, 108 (06): : 751 - 755
  • [49] Perioperative outcomes and complications of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair
    Perrone, JM
    Soper, NJ
    Eagon, JC
    Klingensmith, ME
    Aft, RL
    Frisella, MM
    Brunt, LM
    SURGERY, 2005, 138 (04) : 708 - 715
  • [50] Sarcopenia and outcomes in ventral hernia repair: a preliminary review
    S. R. Siegal
    A. R. Guimaraes
    M. R. Lasarev
    R. G. Martindale
    S. B. Orenstein
    Hernia, 2018, 22 : 645 - 652