Emergency Shutdown Valve damage classification by machine learning using synthetic data

被引:3
|
作者
de Gouveia, S. M. [1 ]
Correa, L. de Abreu [1 ]
Teles, D. B. [2 ]
Oliveira, M. [1 ]
Clarke, T. G. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Univ Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Postgrad Program Min Met & Mat Engn PPGEM, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[2] Fed Univ Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS, Postgrad Program Mech Engn PROMEC, Porto Alegre, Brazil
关键词
Oil & gas; Emergency shutdown valves; RPTFE; Excessive plastic deformation; Cyclical testing; Machine learning; Early signal monitoring; Damage index; Data augmentation; BALL VALVE; FAILURE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107819
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Emergency Shutdown Valves (EDSVs) are used in industrial applications to interrupt internal fluid flow in pipelines during hazardous events. During their operation, these valves can suffer cumulative damage on their reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene (RPTFE) seats that can put their operation and effectiveness at risk. One of the options for detecting the occurrence of damage is to analyse data acquired from fluid pressure and torque sensors during the closing and opening cycles of the valve. The resulting operational signatures are commonly evaluated through so-called Transition Points (TPs) that are manually marked in a subjective manner by a trained operator. In addition to being slow and laborious, this approach discards most of the acquired information. Alternatives to this method would be the use of Damage Indexes (DIs) that are extracted from the signatures, or even the evaluation of the complete pressure or torque signature. These methods, when associated with machine learning (ML) algorithms, could use the acquired information more efficiently and reliably, and would have the potential to completely automate the monitoring process. In this work, these three processing options were tested and compared using real and synthetic data that were generated with the Monte Carlo (MC) method. The results indicate that the evaluation of the complete signature with a Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC) algorithm would be the most effective strategy, which correctly detects the damage in 99% of the cases considered.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Classification of pitting corrosion damage in process facilities using supervised machine learning
    Patel, Parth
    Aryai, Vahid
    Arzaghi, Ehsan
    Kafian, Hesam
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Garaniya, Vikram
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, : 153 - 169
  • [32] Synthetic benchmarks for machine olfaction: Classification, segmentation and sensor damage
    Ziyatdinov, Andrey
    Perera, Alexandre
    [J]. DATA IN BRIEF, 2015, 3 : 126 - 130
  • [33] Machine Learning Based Emergency Patient Classification System
    Puttinaovarat, Supattra
    Pruitikanee, Siwipa
    Kongcharoen, Jinda
    Horkaew, Paramate
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONLINE AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 17 (05) : 133 - 146
  • [34] Blending synthetic and measured data using transfer learning for synthetic aperture radar target classification
    Arnold, Julia M.
    Moore, Linda J.
    Zelnio, Edmund G.
    [J]. ALGORITHMS FOR SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR IMAGERY XXV, 2018, 10647
  • [35] Classification of melanoma from Dermoscopic data using machine learning techniques
    Janney J, Bethanney
    Roslin, S. Emalda
    [J]. MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 79 (5-6) : 3713 - 3728
  • [36] Medical Data Clustering and Classification Using TLBO and Machine Learning Algorithms
    Dubey, Ashutosh Kumar
    Gupta, Umesh
    Jain, Sonal
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2022, 70 (03): : 4523 - 4543
  • [37] Traffic Data Classification using Machine Learning Algorithms in SDN Networks
    Kwon, Jungmin
    Jung, Daeun
    Park, Hyunggon
    [J]. 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ICT CONVERGENCE: DATA, NETWORK, AND AI IN THE AGE OF UNTACT (ICTC 2020), 2020, : 1031 - 1033
  • [38] Data-Driven Consensus Protocol Classification Using Machine Learning
    Marcozzi, Marco
    Filatovas, Ernestas
    Stripinis, Linas
    Paulavicius, Remigijus
    [J]. MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [39] Cancer Classification of Gene Expression Data using Machine Learning Models
    De Guia, Joseph M.
    Devaraj, Madhavi
    Vea, Larry A.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANOID, NANOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL, ENVIRONMENT AND MANAGEMENT (HNICEM), 2018,
  • [40] Fetal health classification from cardiotocographic data using machine learning
    Mehbodniya, Abolfazl
    Lazar, Arokia Jesu Prabhu
    Webber, Julian
    Sharma, Dilip Kumar
    Jayagopalan, Santhosh
    Kousalya, K.
    Singh, Pallavi
    Rajan, Regin
    Pandya, Sharnil
    Sengan, Sudhakar
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS, 2022, 39 (06)