Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns

被引:26
|
作者
Pattamavilai, Sakaorat [1 ]
Ongthiemsak, Chakree [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Dept Prosthet Dent, Hat Yai, Thailand
[2] Prince Songkla Univ, Dept Prosthet Dent, 15 Kanjanavanich Rd, Hat Yai 90112, Songkhla, Thailand
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2024年 / 131卷 / 01期
关键词
IN-VIVO PRECISION; DIGITAL METHODS; IMPRESSIONS; POWDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.12.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. The accuracy (trueness and precision) of intraoral scanners and complete arch scans remains controversial. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the trueness and precision of 3 intraoral scanners with various scan patterns. Material and methods. Four standard metal spheres were installed on a dental maxillary cast according to American National Standard/American Dental Association (ANSI/ADA) specification no. 132. Six distances among the center of spheres were measured with a coordinate measuring machine and used as references. Four different scanning patterns were assigned: zigzag, occlusal-palatal-buccal, occlusal-buccal-palatal, and molar-to-canine. Dental Wings and TRIOS 3 applied to the first 3 scan patterns, while True Definition applied to all patterns (n=30). Six distances in the scan files were also measured and calculated for relative errors of trueness and precision. A ratio less than 0.0025 was considered acceptable and used for binary outcome analysis. Differences among scanners and scan patterns in terms of trueness and precision were analyzed with the chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression (a=.05). Results. The zigzag scan pattern from TRIOS 3 and the occlusal-buccal-palatal pattern from True Definition exhibited 100% acceptable precision. TRIOS 3 revealed the highest number of acceptable trueness values in the occlusal-palatal-buccal scan (88.3%). The scan patterns from Dental Wings and TRIOS 3 were related to the trueness. TRIOS 3 and True Definition were 12.8 and 6.4 times more likely to obtain acceptable trueness than Dental Wings (P<.001). The zigzag scan pattern had the highest chance of obtaining acceptable trueness. Conclusions. The scan patterns influenced the trueness and precision of the intraoral scanners in different ways. For the best trueness, TRIOS 3 should be applied with an occlusal-palatal-buccal scan pattern, Dental Wings should be applied with a zigzag scan pattern, while True Definition can be used with any scan pattern. (J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:155-62)
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 162
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners
    Treesh, Joshua C.
    Liacouras, Peter C.
    Taft, Robert M.
    Brooks, Daniel, I
    Raiciulescu, Sorana
    Ellert, Daniel O.
    Grant, Gerald T.
    Ye, Ling
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (03): : 382 - 388
  • [2] Effect of Scan Pattern on the Accuracy of Complete-Arch Digital Implant Impressions with Two Intraoral Scanners
    Li, Zhipeng
    Huang, Ruoxuan
    Wu, Xiayi
    Chen, Zetao
    Huang, Baoxin
    Chen, Zhuofan
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (04) : 731 - 739
  • [3] Complete-Arch Accuracy of Four Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study
    Celeghin, Giordano
    Franceschetti, Giulio
    Mobilio, Nicola
    Fasiol, Alberto
    Catapano, Santo
    Corsalini, Massimo
    Grande, Francesco
    [J]. HEALTHCARE, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [4] Effect of different arch widths on the accuracy of three intraoral scanners
    Kaewbuasa, Narin
    Ongthiemsak, Chakree
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 13 (04): : 205 - 215
  • [5] Accuracy of Five Intraoral Scanners and Two Laboratory Scanners for a Complete Arch: A Comparative In Vitro Study
    Kang, Byung-hyun
    Son, Keunbada
    Lee, Kyu-bok
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [6] Effect of splinting scan bodies on the trueness of complete arch digital implant scans with 5 different intraoral scanners
    Azevedo, Luis
    Marques, Tiago
    Karasan, Duygu
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Sailer, Irena
    Correia, Andre
    Gomez-Polo, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2024, 132 (01): : 204 - 210
  • [7] Repeatability of Intraoral Scanners for Complete Arch Scan of Partially Edentulous Dentitions: An In Vitro Study
    Lee, Jae-Hyun
    Yun, Je-Hyeon
    Han, Jung-Suk
    Yeo, In-Sung Luke
    Yoon, Hyung-In
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (08)
  • [8] Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
    Moon, Youn-Gyeong
    Lee, Kyung-Min
    [J]. PROGRESS IN ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 21 (01)
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scans between complete-arch scan and quadrant scan
    Youn-Gyeong Moon
    Kyung-Min Lee
    [J]. Progress in Orthodontics, 21
  • [10] Effect of splinting scan bodies on trueness of complete-arch implant impression using different intraoral scanners: an in vitro study
    Retana, Luciano
    Nejat, Amir H.
    Pozzi, Alessandro
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTERIZED DENTISTRY, 2023, 26 (01) : 19 - 28