A guide to outcome evaluation of simulation-based education programmes in low and middle-income countries

被引:0
|
作者
Robinson, Samuel J. A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Oo, Yin Mar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ljuhar, Damir [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
McLeod, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Pacilli, Maurizio [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Nataraja, Ramesh M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Dept Paediat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Clin Sci, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Monash Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[4] Monash Childrens Hosp, Monash Childrens Simulat, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Childrens Hosp, Dept Surg Simulat, 246 Clayton Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3168, Australia
关键词
global health; global surgery; programme evaluation; simulation-based education; surgical education; HEALTH-PROFESSIONS EDUCATION; KIRKPATRICKS EVALUATION; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; DATA QUALITY; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/ans.18987
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation is a vital part of any learning activity and is essential to optimize and improve educational programmes. It should be considered and prioritized prior to the implementation of any learning activity. However, comprehensive programme evaluation is rarely conducted, and there are numerous barriers to high-quality evaluation. This review provides a framework for conducting outcome evaluation of simulation-based education programmes in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). The basis of evaluation, including core ideas of theory, purpose and structure are outlined, followed by an examination of the levels and healthcare applications of the Kirkpatrick model of evaluation. Then, methods of conducting evaluation of simulation-based education in LMICs are discussed through the lens of a successful surgical simulation programme in Myanmar, a lower-middle-income country. The programme involved the evaluation of 11 courses over 4 years in Myanmar and demonstrated evaluation at the highest level of the Kirkpatrick model. Reviewing this programme provides a bridge between evaluation theory and practical implementation. A range of evaluation methods are outlined, including surveys, interviews, and clinical outcome measurement. The importance of a mixed-methods approach, enabling triangulation of quantitative and qualitative analysis, is highlighted, as are methods of analysing data, including statistical and thematic analysis. Finally, issues and challenges of conducting evaluation are considered, as well as strategies to overcome these barriers. Ultimately, this review informs readers about evaluation theory and methods, grounded in a practical application, to enable other educators in low-resource settings to evaluate their own activities.
引用
收藏
页码:1011 / 1020
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Collaborative healthcare education programmes for continuing professional education in low and middle-income countries: A Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 65
    Hill, Elaine
    Gurbutt, Dawne
    Makuloluwa, Thamasi
    Gordon, Morris
    Georgiou, Rachel
    Roddam, Hazel
    Seneviratne, Sujatha
    Byrom, Anna
    Pollard, Kerry
    Abhayasinghe, Kalpani
    Chance-Larsen, Kenneth
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 (11) : 1228 - 1241
  • [32] Evidence-based medicine in low-income and middle-income countries
    Adhikari, Sudeep
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 9 (07): : E903 - E904
  • [33] PISA for low- and middle-income countries
    Bloem, Simone
    COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2015, 45 (03) : 481 - 486
  • [34] Cervical cancer in low and middle-income countries
    Hull, Rodney
    Mbele, Mzwandile
    Makhafola, Tshepiso
    Hicks, Chindo
    Wang, Shao-Ming
    Reis, Rui Manuel
    Mehrotra, Ravi
    Mkhize-Kwitshana, Zilungile
    Kibiki, Gibson
    Bates, David O.
    Dlamini, Zodwa
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2020, 20 (03) : 2058 - 2074
  • [35] An emphasis on neurology in low and middle-income countries
    Knauss, Samuel
    Stelzl, Dominik
    Emmrich, Julius Valentin
    Korsnes, Maria Stylianou
    Sejvar, James J.
    Winkler, Andrea Sylvia
    LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2019, 18 (12): : 1078 - 1079
  • [36] Reconstructive considerations in low and middle-income countries
    Cervenka, Brian
    Trudeau, Stephen
    Fagan, Johan
    Zender, Chad
    CURRENT OPINION IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY & HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2018, 26 (05): : 340 - 346
  • [37] Orthopaedics in low- and middle-income countries
    Andrew Quaile
    International Orthopaedics, 2022, 46 : 1 - 1
  • [38] Multimorbidity matters in low and middle-income countries
    Basto-Abreu, Ana
    Barrientos-Gutierrez, Tonatiuh
    Wade, Alisha N.
    de Melo, Daniela Oliveira
    de Souza, Ana S. Semeao
    Nunes, Bruno P.
    Perianayagam, Arokiasamy
    Tian, Maoyi
    Yan, Lijing L.
    Ghosh, Arpita
    Miranda, J. Jaime
    JOURNAL OF MULTIMORBIDITY AND COMORBIDITY, 2022, 12
  • [39] Hypertension in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
    Schutte, Aletta E.
    Venkateshmurthy, Nikhil Srinivasapura
    Mohan, Sailesh
    Prabhakaran, Dorairaj
    CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 2021, 128 (07) : 808 - 826
  • [40] Surgery for diabetes in low and middle-income countries
    Costas-Chavarri, Ainhoa
    Gillies, Rowan
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2014, 2 (07): : 534 - 535