Comparison of pedicle screw fixation with or without cement augmentation for treating single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis in the osteoporotic spine

被引:3
|
作者
Peng, Jian-cheng [1 ]
Guo, Hui-zhi [2 ,3 ]
Zhan, Chen-guang [2 ,3 ]
Huang, Hua-sheng [2 ,3 ]
Ma, Yan-huai [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shun-cong [2 ,3 ]
Xu, Yue-rong [2 ,3 ]
Mo, Guo-ye [2 ,3 ]
Tang, Yong-chao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Longgang Orthoped Hosp Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518100, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, 12 Airport Rd, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Spine Surg Dept, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou 510407, Peoples R China
关键词
LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; PULLOUT STRENGTH; IN-VITRO; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; PULMONARY-EMBOLISM; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE; LEAKAGE; INSTRUMENTATION; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-023-27539-x
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The present study examined the necessity of cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic patients with single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis.Fifty-nine cases were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty-three cases were in the polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) group, and the other 26 cases were in the conventional pedicle screw (CPS) group. Evaluation data included operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization cost, hospitalization days, rates of fusion, screw loosening, bone cement leakage, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT) and sacral slope (SS). The operation time and blood loss in the CPS group decreased significantly compared to those in the PMMA-PS group. The average hospitalization cost of the PMMA-PS group was significantly higher than that of the CPS group. There was no significant difference in the average hospital stay between the 2 groups. The initial and last follow-up postoperative VAS and ODI scores improved significantly in the two groups. There were no significant differences in VAS and ODI between the 2 groups at each time point. The last postoperative spine-pelvic parameters were significantly improved compared with those preoperatively. In the PMMA-PS group, the fusion rate was 100%. The fusion rate was 96.15% in the CPS group. No significant difference was found between the two groups for the fusion rate. Nine patients in the PMMA-PS group had bone cement leakage. There was no screw loosening in the PMMA-PS group. There were 2 cases of screw loosening in the CPS group. There were no significant differences in screw loosening, postoperative adjacent segment fractures, postoperative infection or postoperative revision between the 2 groups. The use of PMMA-PS on a regular basis is not recommended in posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segment isthmic spondylolisthesis with osteoporosis.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Short-segment percutaneous pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation for tumor-induced spinal instability
    Moussazadeh, Nelson
    Rubin, David G.
    McLaughlin, Lily
    Lis, Eric
    Bilsky, Mark H.
    Laufer, Ilya
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 15 (07): : 1609 - 1617
  • [22] Biomechanical Comparison of Corticopedicular Spine Fixation versus Pedicle Screw Fixation in a Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Finite Element Analysis Model
    Farooqi, Ali S.
    Narayanan, Rajkishen
    Canseco, Jose A.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 190 : E129 - E136
  • [23] Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion
    Chen, Chen
    Cao, Xuecheng
    Zou, Lin
    Hao, Guangliang
    Zhou, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Guichun
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2015, 10
  • [24] Revision of the failed pedicle screw in osteoporotic lumbar spine: Biomechanical comparison of kyphoplasty versus transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate augmentation
    Derincek, Alihan
    Turker, Mehmet
    Cinar, Murat
    Cetik, Ozgur
    Kalaycioglu, Baris
    EKLEM HASTALIKLARI VE CERRAHISI-JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2012, 23 (02): : 106 - 110
  • [25] Minimally invasive unilateral versus bilateral technique in performing single-segment pedicle screw fixation and lumbar interbody fusion
    Chen Chen
    Xuecheng Cao
    Lin Zou
    Guangliang Hao
    Zhenyu Zhou
    Guichun Zhang
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 10
  • [26] Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis
    Haruo Kanno
    Toshimi Aizawa
    Ko Hashimoto
    Eiji Itoi
    European Spine Journal, 2021, 30 : 71 - 78
  • [27] Novel augmentation technique of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation using hydroxyapatite granules in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: a cadaveric biomechanical analysis
    Kanno, Haruo
    Aizawa, Toshimi
    Hashimoto, Ko
    Itoi, Eiji
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 30 (01) : 71 - 78
  • [28] Comparison of Percutaneous Kyphoplasty with or without Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures: A Retrospective Study
    Huang, Dichao
    Ying, Jichong
    Xu, Dingli
    Chen, Jianming
    Liu, Jianlei
    Yu, Tianming
    Zhuang, Yunqiang
    Zhou, Long
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2021, 2021
  • [29] Pedicle screw motion in the osteoporotic spine after augmentation with laminar hooks, sublaminar wires, or calcium phosphate cement: A comparative analysis
    Tan, JS
    Kwon, BK
    Dvorak, MF
    Fisher, CG
    Oxland, TR
    SPINE, 2004, 29 (16) : 1723 - 1730
  • [30] Effect and potential risks of using multilevel cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation in osteoporotic spine with lumbar degenerative disease
    Tang, Yong-chao
    Guo, Hui-zhi
    Guo, Dan-qing
    Luo, Pei-jie
    Li, Yong-xian
    Mo, Guo-ye
    Ma, Yan-huai
    Peng, Jian-cheng
    Liang, De
    Zhang, Shun-cong
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2020, 21 (01)