Comparison of surface resistance-based models for estimating maize evapotranspiration in a humid region of China

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Chunwei [1 ]
Qiu, Rangjian [2 ,6 ]
Cui, Ningbo [3 ]
Zhang, Baozhong [4 ]
Wang, Ranghui [1 ]
Wang, Zhenchang [5 ]
Guo, Weihua [5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Appl Meteorol, Jiangsu Key Lab Agr Meteorol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Coll Water Resource & Hydropower, State Key Lab Hydraul & Mt River Engn, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Hohai Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources Engn & Management, Wuhan 430072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Penman-Monteith model; seasonal clumping model; Shuttleworth-Wallace model; evapotranspiration partitioning; maize; SAP FLOW; CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; ARID REGION; SCALING-UP; LEAF-AREA; EVAPORATION; VINEYARD; CANOPY; SOIL;
D O I
10.1111/1752-1688.13155
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Accurate simulation of evapotranspiration (ET) is essential to enhance efficient irrigation management in the maize field. Here, we evaluated the performance of four mathematical models for estimating the ET of maize. The four models based on surface resistance calculate ET from different vapor sources, which are Penman-Monteith (PM) through the "big leaf" model, the Shuttleworth-Wallace (SW) model for distinguishing between soil and canopy, the clumping (C) model for distinguishing between canopy, soils under the canopy and bare soil, and the seasonal clumping (Cj) model for dividing ET into transpiration of sunlit leaves and shaded leaves, evaporation of bare soil surface, sunlit soil surface of canopy gap fraction, and canopy shaded soil surfaces. The models were calibrated by ET measured from a weighing lysimeter, transpiration by the sap flux method, and soil evaporation by micro-lysimeters in 2014, 2015, and 2017. Results showed that the measured daily transpiration was 3.32 mm/day during the full-grown stage of maize, and the mean measured daily soil evaporation was 1.46 mm/day. The performance of the sap flow for transpiration plus micro-lysimeter for soil evaporation method was consistent with the large-weighted lysimeter method in measuring daily ET. For simulating versus measuring hourly transpiration, the Cj model performed better than the C model with a slope of 0.94, determination coefficient (R-2) of 0.85, mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.08 mm/h, and modified agreement index (d) of 0.81. In simulating daily soil evaporation, the Cj model also had a higher slope and less MAE than the C and SW models. Nevertheless, the Cj model yielded increased slope and d and decreased MAE between simulated and measured daily ET. The most sensitive environmental factor in the Cj model is temperature. With a 50% increase in temperature, ET, transpiration, and evaporation increase by 45%, 36%, and 69%, respectively. In summary, the Cj model improved the accuracy for hourly and daily ET of maize and helped separate plant transpiration and soil evaporation, thus giving an available approach for precision irrigation in water management of maize planting systems.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 42
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of six evapotranspiration models for a surface irrigated maize agro-ecosystem in Northern Italy
    Gharsallah, O.
    Facchi, A.
    Gandolfi, C.
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2013, 130 : 119 - 130
  • [22] Simulation of maize evapotranspiration: An inter-comparison among 29 maize models
    Kimball, Bruce A.
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    Hatfield, Jerry L.
    Ahuja, Laj R.
    Stockle, Claudio
    Archontoulis, Sotirios
    Baron, Christian
    Basso, Bruno
    Bertuzzi, Patrick
    Constantin, Julie
    Deryng, Delphine
    Dumont, Benjamin
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Ewert, Frank
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Hoffmann, Munir P.
    Jiang, Qianjing
    Kim, Soo-Hyung
    Lizaso, Jon
    Moulin, Sophie
    Nendel, Claas
    Parker, Philip
    Palosuo, Taru
    Priesack, Eckart
    Qi, Zhiming
    Srivastava, Amit
    Stella, Tommaso
    Tao, Fulu
    Thorp, Kelly R.
    Timlin, Dennis
    Twine, Tracy E.
    Webber, Heidi
    Willaume, Magali
    Williams, Karina
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2019, 271 : 264 - 284
  • [23] Comparison of methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Rahuri region
    Jadhav, P. B.
    Kadam, S. A.
    Gorantiwar, S. D.
    JOURNAL OF AGROMETEOROLOGY, 2015, 17 (02): : 204 - 207
  • [24] Crop coefficient and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize in a semi-humid region
    Kang, SZ
    Gu, BJ
    Du, TS
    Zhang, JH
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2003, 59 (03) : 239 - 254
  • [25] Comparison of two canopy resistance models to estimate evapotranspiration for tea and wheat in southeast China
    Yan, Haofang
    Yu, Jianjun
    Zhang, Chuan
    Wang, Guoqing
    Huang, Song
    Ma, Jiamin
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 245
  • [26] Comparison of three evapotranspiration models in a rain-fed spring maize filed in the Loess Plateau, China
    Gao, Xiang
    Gu, Fengxue
    Gong, Daozhi
    Hao, Weiping
    Chu, Jianmin
    Li, Haoru
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 2020, 76 (04) : 155 - 163
  • [27] Comparison of different complementary relationship models for estimating regional evapotranspiration
    Liu, SM
    Sun, ZP
    Sun, R
    Zhang, XH
    IGARSS 2004: IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-7: SCIENCE FOR SOCIETY: EXPLORING AND MANAGING A CHANGING PLANET, 2004, : 4289 - 4291
  • [28] Simulation of evapotranspiration and yield of maize: An Inter-comparison among 41 maize models
    Kimball, Bruce A.
    Thorp, Kelly R.
    Boote, Kenneth J.
    Stockle, Claudio
    Suyker, Andrew E.
    Evett, Steven R.
    Brauer, David K.
    Coyle, Gwen G.
    Copeland, Karen S.
    Marek, Gary W.
    Colaizzi, Paul D.
    Acutis, Marco
    Alimagham, Seyyedmajid
    Archontoulis, Sotirios
    Babacar, Faye
    Barcza, Zoltan
    Basso, Bruno
    Bertuzzi, Patrick
    Constantin, Julie
    Migliorati, Massimiliano De Antoni
    Dumont, Benjamin
    Durand, Jean-Louis
    Fodor, Nandor
    Gaiser, Thomas
    Garofalo, Pasquale
    Gayler, Sebastian
    Giglio, Luisa
    Grant, Robert
    Guan, Kaiyu
    Hoogenboom, Gerrit
    Jiang, Qianjing
    Kim, Soo-Hyung
    Kisekka, Isaya
    Lizaso, Jon
    Masia, Sara
    Meng, Huimin
    Mereu, Valentina
    Mukhtar, Ahmed
    Perego, Alessia
    Peng, Bin
    Priesack, Eckart
    Qi, Zhiming
    Shelia, Vakhtang
    Snyder, Richard
    Soltani, Afshin
    Spano, Donatella
    Srivastava, Amit
    Thomson, Aimee
    Timlin, Dennis
    Trabucco, Antonio
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 333
  • [29] Comparison of Satellite Driven Surface Energy Balance Models in Estimating Crop Evapotranspiration in Semi-Arid to Arid Inter-Mountain Region
    Acharya, Bibek
    Sharma, Vivek
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [30] Comparison of satellite-based evapotranspiration models over terrestrial ecosystems in China
    Chen, Yang
    Xia, Jiangzhou
    Liang, Shunlin
    Feng, Jinming
    Fisher, Joshua B.
    Li, Xin
    Li, Xianglan
    Liu, Shuguang
    Ma, Zhuguo
    Miyata, Akira
    Mu, Qiaozhen
    Sun, Liang
    Tang, Jianwei
    Wang, Kaicun
    Wen, Jun
    Xue, Yueju
    Yu, Guirui
    Zha, Tonggang
    Zhang, Li
    Zhang, Qiang
    Zhao, Tianbao
    Zhao, Liang
    Yuan, Wenping
    REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 140 : 279 - 293