Resilience of the Dutch HPV-based cervical screening programme during the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:2
|
作者
Olthof, E. M. G. [1 ,4 ]
Aitken, C. A. [1 ,2 ]
Siebers, A. G. [3 ]
van Kemenade, F. J. [2 ]
de Kok, I. M. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Pathol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] PALGA Fdn, Dutch Nationwide Pathol Databank, Houten, Netherlands
[4] Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Cervical cancer screening; Resilience; HPV screening; COVID-19; Suspension; Self-sampling; COVERAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2023.11.026
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: Organisation of a screening programme influences programme resilience to a disruption as COVID-19. Due to COVID-19, the Dutch human papillomavirus-based cervical screening programme was temporarily suspended. Afterwards, multiple measures have been taken to catch-up participation. This study aimed to investigate programme resilience by examining the effect of COVID-19 and programme measures taken on participation in cervical screening.Study design: Observational cohort study.Methods: Data from the national screening registry and Dutch nationwide pathology databank (Palga) were used on invitations and follow-up in 2018/2019 (pre-COVID) and 2020 (COVID). Sending invitations, reminders and self-sampling kits were suspended from March to July 2020. Main outcome measures include distribution of participant characteristics (age, region and screening history), participation rates by age and region, time between invitation and participation (i.e. response time) and self-sampling use per month.Results: Participation rate was significantly lower in 2020 (49.8%) compared to 2018/19 (56.8%, P < 0.001), in all ages and regions. Compared to 2018/19, participation rates decreased most in women invited from January to March 2020 (-6.7%, -9.1% and -10.4%, respectively). From August, participation rates started to recover (difference between -0.8% and -2.7%). Median response time was longer in February and March (2020: 143 and 173 days; 2018/19: 53 and 55 days) and comparable from July onwards (median difference 0-6 days). Self-sampling use was higher in 2020 (16.3%) compared to 2018/ 19 (7.6%).Conclusions: The pandemic impacted participation rates in the Dutch cervical screening programme, especially of women invited before the programme pause. Implementation of self-sampling in national cervical screening programmes could increase participation rates and could serve as an alternative screening method in times of exceptional health care circumstances, such as a pandemic. Due to the well-organised programme and measures taken to catch-up participation, the impact of COVID-19 on the screening programme remained small.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Royal Society for Public Health.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 48
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Youth psychosocial resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Doom, Jenalee R.
    Deer, LillyBelle K.
    Dieujuste, Nathalie
    Han, Deborah
    Rivera, Kenia M.
    Scott, Samantha R.
    CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 53
  • [32] On Cancer Screening During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Brawley, Otis W.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (27) : 4338 - +
  • [33] The resilience of parliamentary oversight during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Chiru, Mihail
    WEST EUROPEAN POLITICS, 2023,
  • [34] Low rates of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening: Challenges and opportunities in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Smith, Debi L.
    Perkins, Rebecca B.
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 159
  • [35] An Unguided Web-Based Resilience Training Programme for NHS Keyworkers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: a Usability Study
    Bennion M.R.
    Baker F.
    Burrell J.
    Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, 2022, 7 (2) : 125 - 129
  • [36] Official Statistics based on the Dutch Health Survey during the Covid-19 Pandemic
    van den Brakel, Jan
    Smeets, Marc
    SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2023, 49 (01)
  • [37] Towards cervical cancer eradication: joint force of HPV vaccination and HPV-based cervical cancer screening
    Poljak, M.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2015, 21 (09) : 806 - 807
  • [38] HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Nicaragua: from testing to treatment
    Holme, Francesca
    Maldonado, Francisco
    Martinez-Granera, Orlando B.
    Rodriguez, Jose Maria
    Almendarez, Juan
    Slavkovsky, Rose
    Bansil, Pooja
    Thomson, Kerry A.
    Jeronimo, Jose
    de Sanjose, Silvia
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] COVID-19 pandemic causes cervical cancer screening crisis
    Gourd, Elizabeth
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (08): : 1060 - 1060
  • [40] Cervical cancer screening improvements with self-sampling during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Elfstrom, Miriam
    Gray, Penelope Grace
    Dillner, Joakim
    ELIFE, 2023, 12