Cost-benefit analysis in fire safety engineering: State-of-the-art and reference methodology

被引:2
|
作者
Van Coile, Ruben [1 ]
Lucherini, Andrea [1 ,2 ]
Chaudhary, Ranjit Kumar [1 ]
Ni, Shuna [3 ]
Unobe, David [4 ]
Gernay, Thomas [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
[2] Slovenian Natl Bldg & Civil Engn Inst ZAG, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD USA
[4] Utah State Univ, Logan, UT USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Cost -benefit analysis; Fire safety; Investment; Maintenance; Loss; Statistics; Reliability; DECISION-MAKING; RISK; OPTIMIZATION; INVESTMENTS; SPRINKLERS; ECONOMICS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106326
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Cost-effectiveness is a key consideration within fire safety engineering. Currently, different approaches are being applied in literature. These approaches differ in how cost-effectiveness is evaluated, which costs are considered, and how the preferred design solution is defined. Recognizing this issue, the Fire Protection Research Foundation enrolled an international team of researchers, supported by a broad stakeholder panel, to develop a reference methodology. In this paper, this reference methodology for cost-benefit analysis in fire safety engineering is presented following an extensive literature review. The methodology clarifies the minimum requirements for assessing cost-effectiveness, and highlights that only a present net value evaluation can be used to compare design alternatives. Commonly used cost-benefit ratios should only be used when deciding on the effectiveness of a single package of fire safety measures. An illustrative case study demonstrates the application of the methodology and shows how designs based on cost-benefit ratios can be sub-optimal when evaluating multiple possible fire safety measures.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] State of the Art Methodologies for the Estimation of Fire Costs in Buildings to Support Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Unobe, Ikwulono David
    Lucherini, Andrea
    Ni, Shuna
    Gernay, Thomas
    Chaudhary, Ranjit
    Van Coile, Ruben
    [J]. FIRE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 60 (03) : 2067 - 2100
  • [2] A METHODOLOGY FOR COST-BENEFIT SAFETY ANALYSIS FOR FUSION-REACTORS
    BRERETON, SJ
    KAZIMI, MS
    [J]. FUSION TECHNOLOGY, 1986, 10 (02): : 275 - 289
  • [3] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN MODEL-BASED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING: STATE OF THE ART AND FUTURE POTENTIALS
    Eigner, Martin
    Huwig, Christian
    Dickopf, Thomas
    [J]. ICED 15, VOL 7: PRODUCT MODULARISATION, PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING,PRODUCT SERVICE SYSTEMS, 2015,
  • [4] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND ART OF MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE
    FISCHHOFF, B
    [J]. POLICY SCIENCES, 1977, 8 (02) : 177 - 202
  • [5] A cost-benefit state
    McGarity, TO
    [J]. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW, 1998, 50 (01) : 7 - 79
  • [6] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN SAFETY POLICY MAKING
    DAVIES, N
    [J]. CHEMISTRY & INDUSTRY, 1989, (08) : 251 - 256
  • [7] Cost-Benefit Analysis of Urban Fire Stations Management
    Kang Canhua
    Wu Wei
    Yan Xi
    [J]. E-BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2011, 3 : 56 - +
  • [8] Fire, Tractors, and Health in the Amazon: A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Fire Policy
    Morello, Thiago
    Martino, Simone
    Duarte, Alejandro F.
    Anderson, Liana
    Davis, Katrina J.
    Silva, Sonaira
    Bateman, Ian J.
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 2019, 95 (03) : 409 - 434
  • [9] A methodology for cost-benefit analysis of information security technologies
    Zeng, Wen
    [J]. CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2019, 31 (07):
  • [10] Methodology for cost-benefit analysis of space launch infrastructure
    Comstock, DA
    Christensen, CB
    Maryniak, G
    tenCate, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1997, 34 (02) : 246 - 251