Modeling the challenges of technology adoption in dairy farming

被引:3
|
作者
Kaushik, Hans [1 ]
Rajwanshi, Rohit [1 ]
Bhadauria, Artee [1 ]
机构
[1] Dayalbagh Educ Inst, Fac Social Sci, Dept Management, Agra, India
关键词
Dairy farming; Dairy business; Technology adoption; Nominal group technique (NGT); Fuzzy interpretive structural modeling (FISM); FMICMAC; USER ACCEPTANCE; CHAIN; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1108/JSTPM-09-2022-0163
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
PurposeThe global research evidences indicate that the technology adoption in case of agribusiness has a potential to enhance the performance and bring operational efficiency. India is the world's largest producer as well as consumer of milk but struggles with yield per cattle, overall productivity, low rate of technology acceptance and adoption, health detection of milching units, animal data recording and presence of dairy products in the global market. The purpose of this study is to focus on identifying the challenges of technology adoption in dairy farms and constructing a hierarchical model using soft systems methodology. Design/methodology/approachThis study uses nominal group technique-based discussion with domain experts and personal interviews with dairy farm owners/managers for the identification of challenges, fuzzy interpretative structural modeling as well as FMICMAC to develop a hierarchical model of challenging elements and to divide the identified elements into four categories based on the dominance of driving-dependence power. FindingsThis research has developed a list of 12 challenges affecting the technology adoption in a dairy farm business unit, identified through the personal interviews with 60 dairy farms across three highest milk-producing states of India in terms of annual milk output - Haryana, Punjab and Uttar Pradesh. Lack of government support followed by lack of educational opportunities in dairy-based education were found as the most crucial and high driving challenges, whereas high cost, huge investment and low acceptance of decision-maker were found as the most dependent challenges of technology adoption. Research limitations/implicationsThis research is one step ahead of interpretive structural modeling that considers the fuzzy-based dominance in the model to showcase the degree of relationship along with its existence, but it lacks to statistically validate the findings using techniques like SEM. Practical implicationsThis paper has developed a list of challenges in adoption of technology along with their inter-relationships to highlight the required focus challenge that drives or is dependent on the other challenges. The goal is to bring performance improvement and assist Indian dairy farm business stakeholders or decision-makers in formulating strategic and action plans and help policy planners to make favorable policies based on the understanding of contextual relationship between challenges. Social implicationsIn Indian context, dairy is an important part of agriculture sector, and milk is an essential item that facilitates income generation to small and rural households and a source item for several other businesses and activities. The results of this research suggested the policy planners and government to ensure subsidized and insured technologies, training support and facilities, educational opportunities and efforts for promotion of technology adoption among dairy farmers. The suggestions are purely on the basis of the relevance of challenges in the hierarchy and can play a significant role in improving the level of technology adoption and can ultimately uplift the social and economic well-being from micro-level of farmers to macro-stage concerning economic development of India. Originality/valueTo the best of the authors' knowledge, this study is purely original and outcome of the research conducted by authors.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Potential Challenges to the Adoption of Organic Poultry Farming in Nigeria: A Review
    Adedeji, O. S.
    Ogunsina, T. K.
    Akinwumi, A. O.
    Ameen, S. A.
    Ojebiyi, O. O.
    Akinlade, J. A.
    [J]. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 3 (04): : 653 - 656
  • [22] The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming
    Flett, R
    Alpass, F
    Humphries, S
    Massey, C
    Morriss, S
    Long, N
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 80 (02) : 199 - 211
  • [23] Precision Farming: Barriers of Variable Rate Technology Adoption in Italy
    Masi, Margherita
    Di Pasquale, Jorgelina
    Vecchio, Yari
    Capitanio, Fabian
    [J]. LAND, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [24] Determinants of farmers' adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria
    Adesina, AA
    Chianu, J
    [J]. AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2002, 55 (02) : 99 - 112
  • [25] Determinants of farmers' adoption and adaptation of alley farming technology in Nigeria
    Akinwumi A. Adesina
    Jonas Chianu
    [J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2002, 55 : 99 - 112
  • [26] Adoption of a politicized technology: bST and Wisconsin dairy farmers
    Barham, BL
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (04) : 1056 - 1063
  • [27] Factors influencing farmers' adoption of precision dairy technology
    Qiuhong, Ren
    Hua, Peng
    Xiaoxia, Dong
    Hongjie, Yang
    Liyu, Zhang
    Liwang, Li
    [J]. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38 (11): : 231 - 238
  • [28] Modeling technology adoption in the hardwood sawmill
    Bowe, Scott A.
    Smith, Robert L.
    [J]. WOOD AND FIBER SCIENCE, 2006, 38 (03): : 484 - 496
  • [29] Technology Adoption and Diffusion in the Gulf: Some Challenges
    Baadel, Said
    Majeed, Asim
    Kabene, Stefane
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON E-EDUCATION, E-BUSINESS, E-MANAGEMENT AND E-LEARNING (IC4E 2017), 2015, : 16 - 18
  • [30] MOTIVATIONAL FACTORS AFFECTING ADOPTION OF IMPROVED DAIRY FARMING PRACTICES IN RURAL AREAS
    Singh, Khajan
    Chakravarty, Ritu
    Jadoun, Y. S.
    Bhadauria, Pragya
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2012, 46 (04) : 376 - 380