Prenatal diagnosis after high chance non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomies 21, 18 and 13, chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis? - Experience at a district general hospital in the United Kingdom

被引:3
|
作者
Okoror, Collins Ejakhianghe Maximilian [1 ,2 ]
Arora, Suruchi [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Craven Rd, Reading RG1 5AN, England
[2] Royal Berkshire Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Reading RG1 5AN, England
关键词
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT); Antenatal screening/diagnosis; Chorionic villus sampling (CVS); Amniocentesis; Invasive prenatal testing/diagnosis; Confined placental mosaicism (CPM); CELL-FREE DNA; FREE FETAL DNA; MATERNAL PLASMA; NATIONAL SOCIETY; ANEUPLOIDIES; MOSAICISM; CONFIRMATION; ABNORMALITY; PREGNANCIES; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100211
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) analyses cell-free DNA (cfDNA) derived from the placental tissue in the maternal circulation. Though highly sensitive and specific, a major limitation is in cases of confined placental mosaicism (CPM). Whether to perform chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or amniocentesis to confirm a positive NIPT result is controversial. One major drawback of CVS is that cytogenetic diagnosis may not always reflect the true chromosomal make-up of the fetus. This work, therefore, proposes the use of amniocentesis in the presence of normal ultrasound findings, and the option of either CVS or amniocentesis when there are abnormal USS findings.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [31] Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for Trisomy 21, 18 and 13: empiric conclusions after 10,000 samples
    Pereira, Ana Rita
    Tavares, Ines Moura
    Pitrez, Luena
    Sa, Joaquim
    Cerqueira, Rita
    Lopes, Alexandra
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2024, 32 : 1324 - 1324
  • [32] Improving the calling of non-invasive prenatal testing on 13-/18-/21-trisomy by support vector machine discrimination
    Yang, Jianfeng
    Ding, Xiaofan
    Zhu, Weidong
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [33] Maternal serum protein profile and immune response protein subunits as markers for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 21, 18, and 13
    Narasimhan, Kothandaraman
    Lin, Su Lin
    Tong, Terry
    Baig, Sonia
    Ho, Sherry
    Sukumar, Ponnusamy
    Biswas, Arijit
    Hahn, Sinuhe
    Bajic, Vladimir B.
    Choolani, Mahesh
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2013, 33 (03) : 223 - 231
  • [34] Performance analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing for trisomy 13, 18, and 21: A large-scale retrospective study (2018-2021)
    Lu, Yu-shan
    Chen, Ying-ying
    Ding, Si-yi
    Zeng, Li
    Shi, Liang-cheng
    Li, Yu-jiao
    Zhang, Jing-jing
    Fu, Jin
    Zhou, Shi-hao
    He, Jun
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (13)
  • [35] Fetal fraction-based risk algorithm for non-invasive prenatal testing: screening for trisomies 13 and 18 and triploidy in women with low cell-free fetal DNA
    Mckanna, T.
    Ryan, A.
    Krinshpun, S.
    Kareht, S.
    Marchand, K.
    Grabarits, C.
    Ali, M.
    Mcelheny, A.
    Gardiner, K.
    Lechien, K.
    Hsu, M.
    Saltzman, D.
    Stosic, M.
    Martin, K.
    Benn, P.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 53 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [36] Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) in pregnancies with trisomy 21,18 and 13 performed in a public setting - factors of importance for correct interpretation of results
    Hartwig, Tanja S.
    Ambye, Louise
    Werge, Lene
    Weiergang, Martin Kenneth
    Norgaard, Pernille
    Sorensen, Steen
    Jorgensen, Finn Stener
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 226 : 35 - 39
  • [37] A Comparison of the Frequency of Trisomy 13, 18, and 21 Using Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing According to Diminished vs. Normal Egg Reserve and Age
    Neumann, Brooke
    Weitz, Nicole
    Check, Jerome H.
    Wilson, Carrie
    Diantonio, Ann
    O'Neil, Megan
    REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2024, 5 (02): : 81 - 89
  • [38] How does cell-based non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) perform against chorionic villus sampling and cell-free NIPT in detecting trisomies and copy number variations? A clinical study from Denmark
    Hatt, Lotte
    Ravn, Katarina
    Dahl Jeppesen, Line
    Hestbek Nicolaisen, Bolette
    Baasch Christensen, Inga
    Singh, Ripudaman
    Schelde, Palle
    Horsholt Thomsen, Simon
    Christensen, Rikke
    Sinding, Marianne
    Vase, Laura
    Oestergaard, Marianne
    Bender Ruggard, Marie
    Jensen, Hanne S.
    Mogensen, Helle
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    Becher, Naja
    Markholt, Sara
    Sandager, Puk
    Henning Pedersen, Lars
    Vogel, Ida
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2023, 43 (07) : 854 - 864
  • [39] Opinion of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics e.V. on the Project S16-06 of the IQWiG Non-invasive Prenatal Diagnosis to determine the Risk of autosomal Trisomies 13,18 and 21 in High-risk Pregnancies
    Germer, Ute
    Kagan, Karl Oliver
    Gembruch, Ulrich
    GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2018, 78 (08) : 755 - 756
  • [40] Cell-Free DNA Analysis of Targeted Genomic Regions in Maternal Plasma for Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing of Trisomy 21, Trisomy 18, Trisomy 13, and Fetal Sex
    Koumbaris, George
    Kypri, Elena
    Tsangaras, Kyriakos
    Achilleos, Achilleas
    Mina, Petros
    Neofytou, Maria
    Velissariou, Voula
    Christopoulou, Georgia
    Kallikas, Ioannis
    Gonzalez-Linan, Alicia
    Benusiene, Egle
    Latos-Bielenska, Anna
    Marek, Pietryga
    Santana, Alfredo
    Nagy, Nikoletta
    Szell, Marta
    Laudanski, Piotr
    Papageorgiou, Elisavet A.
    Loannides, Marios
    Patsalis, Philippos C.
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 62 (06) : 848 - 855