The perception of lip aesthetics in the context of facial proportions-An eye-tracking-based analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kempa, Joanna [1 ]
Alfertshofer, Michael [2 ]
Swift, Arthur [3 ]
Green, Jeremy B. [4 ,5 ]
Antoszewski, Boguslaw [6 ]
Timler, Wojciech [7 ]
Cotofana, Sebastian [8 ,9 ,10 ]
Kasielska-Trojan, Anna [6 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Lodz, Inst Surg, Individual Course Study Plast Reconstruct & Aesthe, Lodz, Poland
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Div Hand Plast & Aesthet Surg, Munich, Germany
[3] Westmt Inst Plast Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Skin Associates South Florida, Coral Gables, FL USA
[5] Skin Res Inst, Coral Gables, FL USA
[6] Med Univ Lodz, Inst Surg, Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg Clin, Lodz, Poland
[7] Med Univ Lodz, Dept Management & Logist Healthcare, Lodz, Poland
[8] Erasmus MC, Dept Dermatol, Dr Molewaterpl 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[9] Queen Mary Univ London, Blizard Inst, Ctr Cutaneous Res, London, England
[10] Guangdong Second Prov Gen Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
MASK;
D O I
10.1111/jdv.19727
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
BackgroundMinimally invasive lip volumizing and contouring soft tissue filler procedures are frequently requested by both female and male aesthetic patients. Guidance on how to achieve the most beautiful outcome is inconsistent.ObjectiveTo investigate what the most beautiful proportions are in relation to vermillion thickness, the distance of the upper and lower lip in relation to nose and chin, and relation to the bigonial distance.MethodsThis study included a total of n = 101 volunteers (52 females, 49 males, 100% Caucasian) who inspected frontal images of modified facial proportions and answered a related questionnaire showcasing the same images. Image presentation followed a randomized sequence both for the eye tracking and for the survey component of this study but was equal for all observers.ResultsThe most attractive vertical position of lips was the 1:2 ratio in which the distance between lips and chin is double the length as the distance between lips and nose. For the ratio between the width of the lips and the bigonial distance, it was the 1:2.5 ratio, whereas for the thickness of the upper lip vermilion in relation to the upper lip ergotrid it was the 1:3/1:2 (male/female) ratio and for the lower lip vermilion and lower lip ergotrid it was the 1:4 ratio for both genders.ConclusionThe results of this eye tracking and survey-based investigation revealed that instead of one single universal ratio, multiple facial proportions exist that are perceived as most attractive/masculine/feminine. Regarding the perception of facial aesthetics, it appears there is a distinction between attractiveness and masculinity/femininity: the most attractive male/female face is not necessarily the most masculine or feminine.
引用
收藏
页码:1606 / 1617
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of an Eye-Tracking-Based Method for Assessing the Visual Performance with Progressive Lens Designs
    Concepcion-Grande, Pablo
    Chamorro, Eva
    Cleva, Jose Miguel
    Alonso, Jose
    Gomez-Pedrero, Jose A.
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (08):
  • [32] Eye-Tracking-Based Prediction of User Experience in VR Locomotion Using Machine Learning
    Gao, Hong
    Kasneci, Enkelejda
    COMPUTER GRAPHICS FORUM, 2022, 41 (07) : 589 - 599
  • [33] Perceptual Evaluation of Masked AutoEncoder Emergent Properties Through Eye-Tracking-Based Policy
    Tliba, Marouane
    Kerkouri, Mohamed Amine
    Chetouani, Aladine
    Bruno, Alessandro
    El-Hassouni, Mohammed
    Coltekin, Arzu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2024 ACM SYMPOSIUM ON EYE TRACKING RESEARCH & APPLICATIONS, ETRA 2024, 2024,
  • [34] Eye-tracking-based visual field analysis (EFA): a reliable and precise perimetric methodology for the assessment of visual field defects
    Leitner, Michael Christian
    Hutzler, Florian
    Schuster, Sarah
    Vignali, Lorenzo
    Marvan, Patrick
    Reitsamer, H. A.
    Hawelka, Stefan
    BMJ OPEN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 6 (01):
  • [35] ETMT: A Tool for Eye-Tracking-Based Trail-Making Test to Detect Cognitive Impairment
    Chandrasekharan, Jyotsna
    Joseph, Amudha
    Ram, Amritanshu
    Nollo, Giandomenico
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (15)
  • [36] Eye-Tracking-Based Measurement of Social Visual Engagement Compared With Expert Clinical Diagnosis of Autism
    Jones, Warren
    Klaiman, Cheryl
    Richardson, Shana
    Aoki, Christa
    Smith, Christopher
    Minjarez, Mendy
    Bernier, Raphael
    Pedapati, Ernest
    Bishop, Somer
    Ence, Whitney
    Wainer, Allison
    Moriuchi, Jennifer
    Tay, Sew-Wah
    Klin, Ami
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2023, 330 (09): : 854 - 865
  • [37] An eye-tracking-based approach to evaluate the usability of government portal websites in pilot smart cities
    Li, Dezhi
    Zhou, Huan
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Huang, Guanying
    Ma, Xiaoming
    Zhao, Yongheng
    Wang, Wentao
    Ng, S. Thomas
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (04) : 2369 - 2396
  • [38] Eye-Tracking-Based Cognitive Assessment Efficiently Detects Mild Cognitive Decline in the Predementia Stage
    Katsuhisa, Mizuki
    Oyama, Akane
    Ito, Yuki
    Sugihara, Nanami
    Teshirogi, Shin
    Yamamoto, Sho
    Ikegawa, Yuya
    Nakajima, Tsuneo
    Nakatani, Yoshitaka
    Yamamoto, Eriko
    Bando, Hiromi
    Tanaka, Sayaka
    Hashimoto, Mamoru
    Iwata, Kazuhiko
    Takeda, Shuko
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2024,
  • [39] Eye-tracking-based assessment suggests preserved well-being in locked-in patients
    Linse, Katharina
    Rueger, Wolfgang
    Joos, Markus
    Schmitz-Peiffer, Henning
    Storch, Alexander
    Hermann, Andreas
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2017, 81 (02) : 310 - 315
  • [40] Social attractiveness perception of a cleft lip repair in an adolescent via eye-tracking
    Hartmann, Giovani Ceron
    Guimaraes, Lara Karolina
    Maggioni, Caroline Gernet
    Gasparello, Gil Guilherme
    Mota Junior, Sergio Luiz
    Pithon, Matheus Melo
    Tanaka, Orlando Motohiro
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (05) : E526 - E532