A Prior History of Cryptozoospermia Is Associated with a Significantly Higher Chance of a Successful Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction Compared to Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

被引:1
|
作者
Wren, James [1 ]
Hudnall, Matthew [1 ]
Pham, Minh [1 ]
Darves-Bornoz, Anne L. [1 ]
Halpern, Joshua A. [1 ]
Bennett, Nelson E. [1 ]
Brannigan, Robert E. [1 ]
Hofer, Matthias D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Urol, 676 North St Clare St,Arkes Pavil 23-025, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
cryptozoospermia; azoospermia; microdissection testicular sperm extraction; REPRODUCTIVE OUTCOMES; EJACULATED SPERM; MALE-INFERTILITY; MEN; INJECTION; SPERMATOZOA; RETRIEVAL; ASPIRATION; MANAGEMENT; FERTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12237255
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Our study sought to evaluate the rates of successful sperm retrieval following microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with a prior history of cryptozoospermia, compared to patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Methods: A retrospective chart analysis evaluating all mTESE procedures was performed from January 2004 to August 2018. Inclusion criteria involved all males >18 years of age with a diagnosis of cryptozoospermia and/or NOA that underwent a mTESE. The patient's genetic profile, hormonal profile, semen analysis, testicular volumes, pathology and comorbidities were analyzed. Results: We identified 40 patients with cryptozoospermia and 221 patients with NOA. Successful mTESE occurred in 34/40 (85%) cryptozoospermic males compared to 104/221 (48%) NOA males (p < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, patients with cryptozoospermia were more likely to undergo a successful mTESE than patients with NOA (OR 5.56 [1.79-17.29], p = 0.003; OR 5.41 [1.94-15.08], p = 0.0013), respectively. Factors that were associated with a statistically significant lower chance of successful mTESE included Sertoli-cell only pathology, pre-operative testosterone < 300 ng/dL and FSH > 7.6 mIU/mL. Conclusion: Despite patients with a history of cryptozoospermia having a significantly higher chance of a successful sperm retrieval than patients with NOA, couples should be counselled on the possibility of an unsuccessful sperm extraction, in order to optimize the pre-operative IVF planning and to manage operative expectations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Rate of testicular histology failure in predicting successful testicular sperm extraction in Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
    Tondo, F.
    Albani, E.
    Arruzzolo, L.
    Castellano, S.
    Cesana, A.
    Smeraldi, A.
    Setti, P. E. Levi
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : 204 - 204
  • [22] TESTICULAR SPERM EXTRACTION FOR TREATMENT OF NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA IN MEN WITH HISTORY OF CRYPTORCHIDISM
    Bach, Phil
    Najari, Bobby
    Neto, Filipe Tenorio Lira
    Palermo, Gianpiero
    Zaninovic, Nikica
    Rosenwaks, Zev
    Schlegel, Peter
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E171 - E171
  • [23] PREDICTORS FOR SPERM RETRIEVAL IN MICRODISSECTION SPERM EXTRACTION FOR NON-OBSTRUCTIVE AZOOSPERMIA.
    Ishikawa, T.
    Yamaguchi, K.
    Takaya, Y.
    Nishiyama, R.
    Kitaya, K.
    Matsubayashi, H.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (03) : E294 - E294
  • [24] Testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia
    Ernest, NHY
    Lan, LY
    Biu, YS
    Ki, SW
    Chor, TP
    Chung, HP
    CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 113 (03) : 246 - 250
  • [25] Successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction despite high serum follicle stimulating hormone levels in men with non-obstructive azoospermia
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Lin, Kathleen
    Schlegel, Peter N.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (04): : 654 - 654
  • [26] Factors Influencing the Decision for Fresh vs Cryopreserved Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction for Non-Obstructive Azoospermia
    Asanad, Kian
    Coward, R. Matthew
    Mehta, Akanksha
    Smith, James F.
    Vij, Sarah C.
    Nusbaum, David J.
    Rodman, John C. S.
    Samplaski, Mary K.
    UROLOGY, 2021, 157 : 131 - 137
  • [27] MicroRNA profile comparison of testicular tissues derived from successful and unsuccessful microdissection testicular sperm extraction retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia patients
    Fang, Na
    Cao, Congcong
    Wen, Yujiao
    Wang, Xiaoli
    Yuan, Shuiqiao
    Huang, Xunbin
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (04) : 671 - 682
  • [28] Three-dimensional simulation analysis of microdissection testicular sperm extraction for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia
    Ichioka, Kentaro
    Matsui, Yoshiyuki
    Terada, Naoki
    Negoro, Hiromitsu
    Goto, Takayuki
    Ogawa, Osamu
    ANDROLOGY, 2020, 8 (05) : 1214 - 1221
  • [29] Prediction Models for Successful Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Undergoing Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction: Is There Any Room for Further Studies?
    Caroppo, Ettore
    Colpi, Giovanni Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (23)
  • [30] Predictive factors of successful testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism and normal testosterone
    Saber-Khalaf, Mohammed
    Ali, Atef F.
    Elsoghier, Omar M.
    ANDROLOGIA, 2022, 54 (01)