Using APC-AVL Data to Improve Transit Reliability and Accessibility Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Lee, Daryn [1 ]
Qian, Sean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Heinz Coll, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
PUBLIC TRANSPORT; TIME; DISTRIBUTIONS; VARIABILITY; ASSIGNMENT;
D O I
10.1061/JTEPBS.TEENG-8027
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Real-world transit service often deviates substantially from schedules, leading to variability in route-choice behaviors and experienced travel times that are not adequately reflected in existing accessibility analyses based on general transit feed specification (GTFS) schedule data alone. This study presents a methodology for more accurately assessing origin-destination (OD) transit reliability and accessibility by using GTFS data to generate candidate itineraries, then using automatic passenger counting and automatic vehicle location (APC-AVL) data to determine which routes are selected in real time and calculate the experienced travel time. The methodology is applied across March 2016-2020 from the perspectives of two groups in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania: residents in origins of high socioeconomic need traveling to opportunity employment hotspots, and prospective employers looking to establish a transit-accessible worksite. The worst OD pairs in practice achieved less than 15% of the accessibility captured by 95% of scheduled trips. At the 90-min threshold, the lowest observed accessibility corresponded to a realized loss of 17% of the eligible workforce due to service unreliability. These findings reveal the need to incorporate APC-AVL data to accurately model the route choice process and evaluate rider experiences.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Using Big Data and Machine Learning to Improve Aircraft Reliability and Safety
    Salvador, Marcos
    Yacout, Soumaya
    AboElHassan, Ayman
    [J]. 2022 68TH ANNUAL RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY SYMPOSIUM (RAMS 2022), 2022,
  • [42] Analysis and Reliability Test to Improve the Data Retention Performance of EPROM Circuits
    Luan, Jiyuan
    DiVita, Michael
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTEENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON QUALITY ELECTRONIC DESIGN (ISQED 2013), 2013, : 273 - 277
  • [43] Using degradation data for product reliability analysis
    Meeker, WQ
    Daganaksoy, N
    Hahn, GJ
    [J]. QUALITY PROGRESS, 2001, 34 (06) : 60 - 65
  • [44] Using functional analysis diagrams to improve product reliability and cost
    Michalakoudis, Ioannis
    Childs, Peter
    Aurisicchio, Marco
    Harding, James
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 9 (01)
  • [45] Rail Transit Travel Time Reliability and Estimation of Passenger Route Choice Behavior Analysis Using Automatic Fare Collection Data
    Sun, Yanshuo
    Xu, Ruihua
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2275) : 58 - 67
  • [46] Analysis of Transit Accessibility to Transportation Hubs at Multi-Scale Based on Open Data and ArcGIS: The Case of Nanjing
    Lei, Xinyue
    Guo, Xiucheng
    Liu, Shanshan
    Chen, Hao
    Zou, Yukun
    [J]. CICTP 2019: TRANSPORTATION IN CHINA-CONNECTING THE WORLD, 2019, : 4449 - 4460
  • [47] Analyzing transit service reliability using detailed data from automatic vehicular locator systems
    El-Geneidy, Ahmed M.
    Horning, Jessica
    Krizek, Kevin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, 2011, 45 (01) : 66 - 79
  • [48] Quantile Regression Analysis of Transit Travel Time Reliability with Automatic Vehicle Location and Farecard Data
    Ma, Zhenliang
    Zhu, Sicong
    Koutsopoulos, Haris N.
    Ferreira, Luis
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2652) : 19 - 29
  • [49] Reliability analysis of a conveyor system using hybrid data
    Gupta, Suprakash
    Bhattacharya, Jayanta
    [J]. QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 23 (07) : 867 - 882
  • [50] Modeling and analysis of using memory management unit to improve software reliability
    Chang, SJ
    Kapauan, PTZ
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON SOFTWARE RELIABILITY ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 96 - 102