Impacts of 5G on cyber-physical risks for interdependent connected smart critical infrastructure systems

被引:3
|
作者
Vargas, Paola [1 ]
Tien, Iris [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, North Ave NW, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
5G; Critical infrastructure; Risk; Resilience; Cybersecurity; SECURITY; CHALLENGES; INTERNET; PRIVACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcip.2023.100617
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
5 G technology promises a wide range of benefits for critical infrastructure (CI), including improved reliability, increased efficiency, cost savings, and increased worker safety. However, it also brings many new risks that CI owners and operators must be prepared for to facilitate effective risk mitigation and response. These risks, however, have not been systematically assessed for CI systems. This paper investigates how the cyber-physical risk landscape will be impacted by 5 G for four major CI sectors in detail: smart transportation, smart water, smart power, and smart oil and gas networks. Compared to prior work only examining a single CI network, the authors present a comprehensive assessment of the types of threats that these sectors can expect based on past incidents, the new vulnerabilities introduced by 5 G and existing vulnerabilities exacerbated by the introduction of more connected devices, along with mitigation recommendations for each risk. Risks associated with the rollout of and transition to 5 G, risks from 5 G network disruptions, cyberattack risks, and privacy risks are included. While each of the sectors has a unique risk profile, general themes also emerged across multiple CI networks. Notably, there will be an increased number of threat vectors from smart devices reliant on the telecommunications network to provide monitoring and control of infrastructure services. Because many of these devices are accessible by the public, the risk of social engineering attacks and vulnerability to physical hacking are exacerbated. Successful risk mitigation requires collaboration among CI's many stakeholders to implement security measures at the interfaces between connected devices to limit the access to assets in case one security measure is successfully bypassed. Due to the increased interdependencies between CI networks, operators must create backup plans to keep the most essential services running on a smaller bandwidth in case of a 5 G outage or similar failure. As 5 G capabilities continue to develop and the risk landscape evolves, ongoing research is needed and CI owners and operators should be prepared to update security measures to remain ahead of identified risks and threats.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Empowering intrusion detection in 5G embedded and cyber-physical networks
    Bhati, Nitesh Singh
    Khari, Manju
    [J]. International Journal of Embedded Systems, 2023, 16 (5-6) : 401 - 412
  • [22] A Realistic Model for Failure Propagation in Interdependent Cyber-Physical Systems
    Sturaro, Agostino
    Silvestri, Simone
    Conti, Mauro
    Das, Sajal K.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NETWORK SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2020, 7 (02): : 817 - 831
  • [23] Enabling Cyber-Physical Systems for 5G networking: A case study on the Automotive Vertical domain
    Tranoris, Christos
    Denazis, Spyros
    Guardalben, Lucas
    Pereira, Joao
    Sargento, Susana
    [J]. 2018 IEEE/ACM 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR SMART CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (SESCPS), 2018, : 37 - 40
  • [24] Robustness of Interdependent Cyber-Physical Systems Against Cascading Failures
    Zhang, Yingrui
    Yagan, Osman
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2020, 65 (02) : 711 - 726
  • [25] A Security Assessment Scheme for Interdependent Cyber-Physical Power Systems
    Chu, Xiaodong
    Tang, Maosen
    Huang, Haoyi
    Zhang, Lei
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2017 8TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND SERVICE SCIENCE (ICSESS 2017), 2017, : 816 - 819
  • [26] Modeling and Analysis of Cascading Failures in Interdependent Cyber-Physical Systems
    Zhang, Yingrui
    Yagan, Osman
    [J]. 2018 IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2018, : 4731 - 4738
  • [27] Reasoning Strategies in Smart Cyber-Physical Systems
    Hakansson, Anne
    Hartung, Ronald
    Moradian, Esmiralda
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE-BASED AND INTELLIGENT INFORMATION & ENGINEERING SYSTEMS 19TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE, KES-2015, 2015, 60 : 1575 - 1584
  • [28] Smart Grids: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
    Yu, Xinghuo
    Xue, Yusheng
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, 2016, 104 (05) : 1058 - 1070
  • [29] Intelligent, smart and scalable cyber-physical systems
    Vijayakumar, V.
    Subramaniyaswamy, V.
    Abawajy, Jemal
    Yang, Longzhi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2019, 36 (05) : 3935 - 3943
  • [30] Smart Monitoring of the Emergencies by Cyber-Physical Systems
    Ruchkin, Vladimir
    Romanchuk, Vitaly
    Kostrov, Boris
    Kolesenkov, Aleksandr
    Ruchkina, Ekaterina
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ELEKTRO 2018, 2018,