Comparison of Functional Outcomes and Complications of Inlay and Onlay Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Neer Type 4 Proximal Humerus Fractures and Cuff Tear Arthropathy: A Multicentric Study

被引:0
|
作者
Kahraman, Sinan [1 ]
Karslioglu, Bulent [2 ]
Imren, Yunus [3 ]
Keskin, Ahmet [3 ]
Bilsel, Kerem [4 ]
Dedeoglu, Suleyman Semih [3 ]
机构
[1] Demiroglu Bilim Univ, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Buyukdere Cd 120, TR-34394 Sisli, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Hlth Sci Univ, Prof Cemil Tascioglu City Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Hlth Sci Univ, Baltalimani Metin Sabanci Bone Dis Training & Res, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[4] Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; Inlay humeral component; Onlay humeral component; Neer Type 4 fractures; Cuff tear arthropathy; Functional outcomes; Complications;
D O I
10.1007/s43465-023-01084-1
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This multicenter retrospective study was conducted with the objective of comparing the outcomes and complications between inlay and onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in patients presenting Neer Type 4 proximal humerus fractures and cuff tear arthropathy. The primary aim of this investigation was to assess and juxtapose the clinical as well as functional outcomes of individuals who underwent onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty with those who underwent inlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty.Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, involving patients who had undergone reverse shoulder arthroplasty between the period of 2016 and 2022. The study divided the population into two groups: Group A received inlay humeral components, while Group B received onlay humeral components. Functional outcomes were evaluated using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and Constant scores. Range of motion, infection, periprosthetic fractures, and nerve injuries were also assessed.Results The study included 67 patients in Group A and 62 patients in Group B. Group A had significantly better functional outcomes, as indicated by higher ASES and Constant scores (p < 0.05). Group A also had greater shoulder joint motion (p < 0.05). Periprosthetic fractures were significantly more common in Group B (p < 0.05). However, complication rates, including infection and instability, did not significantly differ between the groups (p > 0.05). Nerve injuries occurred in both groups, with slightly higher occurrence in Group B.Conclusion Inlay humeral components in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for Neer Type 4 fractures and cuff tear arthropathy resulted in better functional outcomes, increased range of motion, and lower incidence of periprosthetic fractures compared to onlay components. Onlay components showed potential advantages in reducing instability rates. Further studies with larger samples and standardized protocols are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 270
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [11] Effects of humeral component retroversion on functional outcomes in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for cuff tear arthropathy
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    Cho, Nam Su
    Moon, Seong Cheol
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (10) : 1574 - 1581
  • [12] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty as a salvage procedure after failed internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus OUTCOMES AND COMPLICATIONS
    Hussey, M. M.
    Hussey, S. E.
    Mighell, M. A.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2015, 97B (07): : 967 - 972
  • [13] Anatomic greater tuberosity healing does not influence the functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fractures
    Cassart Masnou, E.
    Perez Andres, R.
    Mora Sole, E.
    Garcia Perdomo, D.
    Ruiz Macarrilla, L.
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (3_SUPPL) : 60 - 68
  • [14] Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal humerus fracture
    Young, Simon W.
    Segal, Barak S.
    Turner, Perry C.
    Poon, Peter C.
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 80 (11) : 789 - 793
  • [15] Enhanced Outcomes and Safety of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Rotator Cuff Deficiency and Proximal Humerus Fractures: A 22-Patient Retrospective Analysis
    Tutak, Yilmaz
    Goek, Bilal
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [16] Prospective comparison of functional outcomes of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty for acute fractures versus rotator cuff deficiencies
    Sebastia-Forcada, E.
    Lizaur-Utrilla, A.
    Mahiques-Segura, G.
    Ruiz-Lozano, M.
    Lopez-Prats, F. A.
    Alonso-Montero, C.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (11): : 1555 - 1559
  • [17] Does primary treatment of proximal humerus fractures show favourable functional outcomes over secondary treatment with reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
    Blaas, Leanne S.
    Lameijer, Charlotte M.
    Alta, Tjarco D. W.
    Yuan, Jian Z.
    van Dieren, Susan
    Bloemers, Frank W.
    van Noort, Arthur
    Derksen, Robert Jan
    SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2024, 16 (05) : 559 - 568
  • [18] Comparison of 30-day complications between reverse shoulder arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures
    Ramamurti, Pradip
    Quan, Theodore
    Swansen, Taylor
    Pollard, Tom G.
    Stadecker, Monica
    Gu, Alex
    Doerre, Teresa
    Zimmer, Zachary R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2023, 33 (04): : 1117 - 1124
  • [19] Comparison of 30-day complications between reverse shoulder arthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation for the treatment of proximal humerus fractures
    Pradip Ramamurti
    Theodore Quan
    Taylor Swansen
    Tom G. Pollard
    Monica Stadecker
    Alex Gu
    Teresa Doerre
    Zachary R. Zimmer
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2023, 33 : 1117 - 1124
  • [20] Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 4-part displaced fractures of the proximal humerus: Multicenter retrospective study
    Bonnevialle, N.
    Tournier, C.
    Clavert, P.
    Ohl, X.
    Sirveaux, F.
    Saragaglia, D.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (05) : 569 - 573