Networking the commons: creative commons project creators funding patterns in crowdfunding

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Rong [1 ]
Lu, Li [2 ]
Fulk, Janet [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Human & Org Dev, Peabody Coll Educ & Human Dev, 221 Kirkland Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
[2] West Chester Univ Penn, Dept Management, W Chester, PA USA
[3] Univ Southern Calif, Annenberg Sch Commun, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Marshall Sch Business, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
Online community; Crowdfunding; Social identity; Signaling theory; Collective action; ERGM; COLLECTIVE ACTION; SOCIAL IDENTITY; PARTICIPATION; BACKERS; FEATHER; BIRDS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0166
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Purpose - Guided by the collective action theory, signaling theory and social identity approach, this study examines backing behavior by individuals who have created projects under CC licenses. Two motivational mechanisms were examined: (1) identification via common interests in the CC space; (2) resource signaling by other users via their diverse project creation experience, funding or commenting activity. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from Kickstarter.com. Exponential random graph modeling was used to examine how the two reviewed mechanisms influence the tie formation probability between Creative Commons (CC) project creators and other creators. The analysis was conducted on two subnetworks: one with ties between CC creators; and one with ties from CC creators to non-CC creators. Findings - The study found that CC creators exhibit distinct backing patterns when considering funding other CC creators compared to non-CC users. When considering funding their peer CC creators, CC identity can help them allocate and support perceived in-group members; when considering funding non-CC creators, shared common interests in competitive project categories potentially triggers a competition mindset and makes them hold back when they see potential rivals. Originality/value - This study makes three contributions. First, it draws from multiple theoretical frameworks to investigate unique motivations when crowdfunders take on dual roles of creators and funders and offered implications on how to manage competition and collaboration simultaneously. Second, with network analysis our study not only identifies multiple motivators at work for collective action, but also demonstrates their differential effects in crowdfunding. Third, the integration of multiple theoretical frameworks allows opportunities for theory building. Peer review - The peer review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/OIR05-2020-0166.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 315
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条