Patient-reported Benefits and Limitations of Mobile Health Technologies for Diabetes in Pregnancy: A Scoping Review

被引:3
|
作者
Sushko, Katelyn [1 ,3 ,6 ]
Menezes, Holly Tschirhart [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Qi Rui [1 ]
Nerenberg, Kara [2 ]
Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna [3 ]
Sherifali, Diana [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Nursing, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[3] McMaster Univ, Populat Hlth Res Inst, Hamilton Hlth Sci, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Hlth Res Methods Evidence & Impact, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] McMaster Univ, Diabet Care & Res Program, Boris Clin, Hamilton Hlth Sci,Med Ctr, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[6] McMaster Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada
关键词
diabetes; gestational diabetes; mobile health; pregnancy; type; 1; 2; PEER SUPPORT; WOMEN; MELLITUS; OUTCOMES; TYPE-1; INTERVENTION; MANAGEMENT; ADULTS; FETAL; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcjd.2022.08.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: For women with pre-existing and gestational diabetes, pregnancy involves specialized and intensive medical care to optimize maternal and infant outcomes. Medical management for patients with diabetes in pregnancy typically occurs via frequent face-to-face outpatient appointments. COVID-19-induced barriers to face-to-face care have identified the need for high-quality, patient-centred virtual health-care modalities, such as mobile health (mHealth) technologies. Our aim in this review was to identify the patient-reported benefits and limitations of mHealth technologies among women with dia-betes in pregnancy. We also aimed to determine how the women's experiences aligned with the best practice standards for patient-centred communication.Methods: The framework presented by Arksey and O'Malley for conducting scoping reviews, with refinements by Levac et al, was used to guide this review. Relevant studies were identified through comprehensive database searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare and PsycINFO. Thomas and Harden's methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews guided the synthesis of patient-reported benefits and limitations of mHealth technology. Results: Overall, 19 studies describing the use of 16 unique mHealth technologies among 742 women were included in the final review. Patient-reported benefits of mHealth included convenience, support of psychosocial well-being and facilitation of diabetes self-management. Patient-reported limitations included lack of important technological features, perceived burdensome aspects of mHealth and lack of trust in virtual health care.Conclusions: Women with diabetes report some benefits from mHealth use during pregnancy. Co -designing future technologies with end users may help address the perceived limitations and effectiveness of mHealth technologies.(c) 2022 Canadian Diabetes Association.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 113
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported benefits of acupuncture in pregnancy
    Soliday, Elizabeth
    Hapke, Patrice
    [J]. COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2013, 19 (03) : 109 - 113
  • [2] Electronic patient-reported outcome measures using mobile health technology in rheumatology: A scoping review
    Shelton, Jaclyn
    Casey, Sierra
    Puhl, Nathan
    Buckingham, Jeanette
    Yacyshyn, Elaine
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [3] Patient-reported outcome measures in diabetes outpatient care: a scoping review
    Torbjornsen, Astrid
    Jensen, Annesofie Lunde
    Singstad, Tone
    Weldingh, Nina Mickelson
    Holmen, Heidi
    [J]. BMJ OPEN DIABETES RESEARCH & CARE, 2023, 11 (06)
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcomes in Sarcoma: A scoping review
    Almeida, Ana
    Martins, Teresa
    Lima, Ligia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2021, 50
  • [5] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Vedadi, Ali
    Khairalla, Roula
    Che, Adrian
    Nagee, Ahsas
    Saqib, Mohammed
    Ayub, Ali
    Wasim, Aghna
    Macanovic, Sara
    Orchanian-Cheff, Ani
    Selzner-Malekkiani, Nazia
    Bartlett, Susan
    Mucsi, Istvan
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2023, 32 (09) : 2435 - 2445
  • [6] Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in liver transplantation: a scoping review
    Ali Vedadi
    Roula Khairalla
    Adrian Che
    Ahsas Nagee
    Mohammed Saqib
    Ali Ayub
    Aghna Wasim
    Sara Macanovic
    Ani Orchanian-Cheff
    Nazia Selzner-Malekkiani
    Susan Bartlett
    Istvan Mucsi
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2023, 32 : 2435 - 2445
  • [7] Understanding the use of patient-reported data by health care insurers: A scoping review
    Neubert, Anne
    Brito Fernandes, Oscar
    Lucevic, Armin
    Pavlova, Milena
    Gulacsi, Laszlo
    Baji, Petra
    Klazinga, Niek
    Kringos, Dionne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (12):
  • [8] The association of patient-reported social determinants of health and hospitalization rate: A scoping review
    Ardekani, Ali
    Fereidooni, Reza
    Heydari, Seyed Taghi
    Ghahramani, Sulmaz
    Shahabi, Saeed
    Bagheri Lankarani, Kamran
    [J]. HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2023, 6 (02)
  • [9] Mobile Technologies for Supporting Mental Health in Youths: Scoping Review of Effectiveness, Limitations, and Inclusivity
    Litke, Shannon Grace
    Resnikoff, Annie
    Anil, Ashley
    Montgomery, Meredith
    Matta, Rishabh
    Huh-Yoo, Jina
    Daly, Brian P.
    [J]. JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2023, 10
  • [10] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)