Simulation-Free Radiation Therapy: An Emerging Form of Treatment Planning to Expedite Plan Generation for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy

被引:13
|
作者
Schiff, Joshua P. [1 ]
Zhao, Tianyu [1 ]
Huang, Yi [1 ]
Sun, Baozhou [1 ]
Hugo, Geoffrey D. [1 ]
Spraker, Matthew B. [1 ]
Abraham, Christopher D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
BONE METASTASES; RADIOTHERAPY; COVID-19; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2022.101091
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Herein we report the clinical and dosimetric experience for patients with metastases treated with palliative simulation-free radiation therapy (SFRT) at a single institution. Methods and Materials: SFRT was performed at a single institution. Multiple fractionation regimens were used. Diagnostic imaging was used for treatment planning. Patient characteristics as well as planning and treatment time points were collected. A matched cohort of patients with conventional computed tomography simulation radiation therapy (CTRT) was acquired to evaluate for differences in planning and treatment time. SFRT dosimetry was evaluated to determine the fidelity of SFRT. Descriptive statistics were calculated on all variables and statistical significance was evaluated using the Wilcoxon signed rank test and t test methods. Results: Thirty sessions of SFRT were performed and matched with 30 sessions of CTRT. Seventy percent of SFRT and 63% of CTRT treatments were single fraction. The median time to plan generation was 0.88 days (0.19-1.47) for SFRT and 1.90 days (0.39-5.23) for CTRT (P = .02). The total treatment time was 41 minutes (28-64) for SFRT and 30 minutes (21-45) for CTRT (P = .02). In the SFRT courses, the maximum and mean deviations in the actual delivered dose from the approved plans for the maximum dose were 4.1% and 0.07%, respectively. All deliveries were within a 5% threshold and deemed clinically acceptable. Conclusions: Palliative SFRT is an emerging technique that allowed for a statistically significant lower time to plan generation and was dosimetrically acceptable. This benefit must be weighed against increased total treatment time for patients receiving SFRT compared (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
下载
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Treatment planning for conformal proton radiation therapy
    Bussière, MR
    Adams, JA
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2003, 2 (05) : 389 - 399
  • [42] On the quality of treatment planning systems in radiation therapy
    Panten, T
    Hoss, A
    Bohsung, J
    Becker, G
    Sroka-Perez, G
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 1998, 174 : 31 - 35
  • [43] Treatment planning for radiation mediated gene therapy
    Pelizzari, C
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1297 - 1297
  • [44] MONTE CARLO TREATMENT PLANNING FOR RADIATION THERAPY
    Fernandez-Varea, J. M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2008, 88 : S59 - S59
  • [45] Intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plan optimization
    H. Edwin Romeijn
    James F. Dempsey
    TOP, 2008, 16
  • [46] Intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plan optimization
    Romeijn, H. Edwin
    Dempsey, James F.
    TOP, 2008, 16 (02) : 215 - 243
  • [47] A column generation approach to radiation therapy treatment planning using aperture modulation
    Romeijn, HE
    Ahuja, RK
    Dempsey, JF
    Kumar, A
    SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION, 2005, 15 (03) : 838 - 862
  • [48] Knowledge-based planning for the radiation therapy treatment plan quality assurance for patients with head and neck cancer
    Cao, Wenhua
    Gronberg, Mary
    Olanrewaju, Adenike
    Whitaker, Thomas
    Hoffman, Karen
    Cardenas, Carlos
    Garden, Adam
    Skinner, Heath
    Beadle, Beth
    Court, Laurence
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (06):
  • [49] Pilot Prognostic Model for Survival in r/r DLBCL Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy
    Eastman, B.
    Hippe, D. S.
    Smith, S. C.
    Till, B. G.
    Lynch, R.
    Ujjani, C.
    Shadman, M.
    Warren, E. H.
    Menon, M.
    Poh, C.
    Gopal, A. K.
    Tseng, Y. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E299 - E300
  • [50] A Method to Reduce Time to Start for Patients Receiving Palliative Radiation Therapy for Painful Spine Metastases
    Glober, G.
    Holmes, T. W.
    Chauhan, B.
    Shah, A. P.
    Dvorak, T.
    Rineer, J. M.
    Kelly, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E451 - E452