Machine learning classification of diagnostic accuracy in pathologists interpreting breast biopsies

被引:3
|
作者
Brunye, Tad T. [1 ,2 ]
Booth, Kelsey [1 ]
Hendel, Dalit [1 ]
Kerr, Kathleen F. [3 ]
Shucard, Hannah [3 ]
Weaver, Donald L. [4 ,5 ]
Elmore, Joann G. [6 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Ctr Appl Brain & Cognit Sci, 177 College Ave, Suite 090, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Larner Coll Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[5] Vermont Canc Ctr, Burlington, VT 05405 USA
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
breast pathology; medical education; medical residency training; machine learning; diagnostic decision-making; medical image interpretation; diagnostic accuracy; EYE-MOVEMENT; DECISION-MAKING; METHODOLOGY; EXPERTISE; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1093/jamia/ocad232
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Objective This study explores the feasibility of using machine learning to predict accurate versus inaccurate diagnoses made by pathologists based on their spatiotemporal viewing behavior when evaluating digital breast biopsy images.Materials and Methods The study gathered data from 140 pathologists of varying experience levels who each reviewed a set of 14 digital whole slide images of breast biopsy tissue. Pathologists' viewing behavior, including zooming and panning actions, was recorded during image evaluation. A total of 30 features were extracted from the viewing behavior data, and 4 machine learning algorithms were used to build classifiers for predicting diagnostic accuracy.Results The Random Forest classifier demonstrated the best overall performance, achieving a test accuracy of 0.81 and area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve of 0.86. Features related to attention distribution and focus on critical regions of interest were found to be important predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Further including case-level and pathologist-level information incrementally improved classifier performance.Discussion Results suggest that pathologists' viewing behavior during digital image evaluation can be leveraged to predict diagnostic accuracy, affording automated feedback and decision support systems based on viewing behavior to aid in training and, ultimately, clinical practice. They also carry implications for basic research examining the interplay between perception, thought, and action in diagnostic decision-making.Conclusion The classifiers developed herein have potential applications in training and clinical settings to provide timely feedback and support to pathologists during diagnostic decision-making. Further research could explore the generalizability of these findings to other medical domains and varied levels of expertise.
引用
收藏
页码:552 / 562
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning techniques for classification of breast tissue
    Helwan, Abdulkader
    Idoko, John Bush
    Abiyev, Rahib H.
    9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY AND APPLICATION OF SOFT COMPUTING, COMPUTING WITH WORDS AND PERCEPTION, ICSCCW 2017, 2017, 120 : 402 - 410
  • [22] Diagnostic accuracy of MRI textural analysis in the classification of breast tumors
    Brown, Ann L.
    Jeong, Joanna
    Wahab, Rifat A.
    Zhang, Bin
    Mahoney, Mary C.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2021, 77 : 86 - 91
  • [23] Improving diagnostic accuracy of skin biopsies
    Stevenson, Paul
    Rodins, Karl
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 47 (04) : 216 - 220
  • [24] Automatic classification of white regions in liver biopsies by supervised machine Learning
    Vanderbeck, Scott
    Bockhorst, Joseph
    Komorowski, Richard
    Kleiner, David E.
    Gawrieh, Samer
    HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2014, 45 (04) : 785 - 792
  • [25] Machine Learning Classification of Diagnostic Proteomics for Alzheimer Disease
    Tandon, Raghav
    Seyfried, Nicholas
    Mitchell, Cassie S.
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2021, 90 : S91 - S91
  • [26] Diagnostic accuracy of community pathologists in the interpretation of colorectal polyps
    Denis, Bernard
    Peters, Carol
    Chapelain, Catherine
    Kleinclaus, Isabelle
    Fricker, Anne
    Wild, Richard
    Auge, Bernard
    Gendre, Isabelle
    Perrin, Philippe
    Chatelain, Denis
    Flejou, Jean Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2009, 21 (10) : 1153 - 1160
  • [27] Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies
    Geller, Berta M.
    Nelson, Heidi D.
    Weaver, Donald L.
    Frederick, Paul D.
    Allison, Kimberly H.
    Onega, Tracy
    Carney, Patricia A.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Elmore, Joann G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (11) : 947 - 953
  • [28] CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY - MACHINE LEARNING VS EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION
    BENDAVID, A
    MANDEL, J
    MACHINE LEARNING, 1995, 18 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [29] Raman spectroscopy and machine learning for the classification of breast cancers
    Zhang, Lihao
    Li, Chengjian
    Peng, Di
    Yi, Xiaofei
    He, Shuai
    Liu, Fengxiang
    Zheng, Xiangtai
    Huang, Wei E.
    Zhao, Liang
    Huang, Xia
    SPECTROCHIMICA ACTA PART A-MOLECULAR AND BIOMOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY, 2022, 264
  • [30] Breast Tissue Classification Method Based on Machine Learning
    Li Y.
    Tang Z.
    Zhang L.
    Recent Patents on Engineering, 2024, 18 (01): : 18 - 27