Towards measuring and quantifying the comprehensibility of process models: the process model comprehension framework

被引:0
|
作者
Winter, Michael [1 ]
Pryss, Rudiger [2 ]
Fink, Matthias [3 ]
Reichert, Manfred [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Databases & Informat Syst, Ulm, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Clin Epidemiol & Biometry, Wurzburg, Germany
[3] Ventum Consulting GmbH & Co KG, Infanteriestr 11A, D-80797 Munich, Germany
关键词
Process model; Process modeling; Process model comprehension; Process quality; Process model comprehension framework; QUALITY; ERRORS; BPMN;
D O I
10.1007/s10257-023-00642-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Process models constitute crucial artifacts in modern information systems, and their proper comprehension is of utmost importance in utilizing such systems. Generally, process models are considered from two different perspectives: process modelers and readers. Both perspectives share similarities and differences in the comprehension of process models (e.g., diverse experiences when working with process models). The literature proposed many rules and guidelines to ensure proper comprehension of process models for both perspectives. As a novel contribution in this context, this paper introduces the process model comprehension framework (PMCF), constituting a first approach towards the measurement and quantification of the perspectives of process modelers and readers, as well as the interaction of both regarding the comprehension of process models. Therefore, the PMCF describes an Evaluation theory tree based on the communication theory and the conceptual modeling quality framework and considers a total of 96 quality metrics to quantify process model comprehension. Furthermore, the PMCF was evaluated in a survey with 131 participants and has been implemented and applied successfully in a practical case study including 33 participants. To conclude, the PMCF allows for the identification of pitfalls and provides related information about how to assist process modelers and readers in fostering and enabling a proper comprehension of process models.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:723 / 751
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Process models and business models - A unified framework
    Bergholtz, M
    Jayaweera, P
    Johannesson, P
    Wohed, P
    ADVANCED CONCEPTUAL MODELING TECHNIQUES, 2003, 2784 : 364 - 377
  • [32] Human and automatic modularizations of process models to enhance their comprehension
    Reijers, H. A.
    Mendling, J.
    Dijkman, R. M.
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2011, 36 (05) : 881 - 897
  • [33] Advances in text comprehension: Model, process and development
    Verhoeven, Ludo
    Perfetti, Charles
    APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) : 293 - 301
  • [34] An ontological process model for software maintenance and comprehension
    Meng, Wen Jun
    2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE, 2007, : 529 - 530
  • [35] Text as a comprehension process: Toward a model of synergism
    Yabuuchi, A
    SEMIOTICA, 1999, 123 (1-2) : 59 - 76
  • [36] An Empirical Review of the Connection Between Model Viewer Characteristics and the Comprehension of Conceptual Process Models
    Mendling, Jan
    Recker, Jan
    Reijers, Hajo A.
    Leopold, Henrik
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2019, 21 (05) : 1111 - 1135
  • [37] The influence of notational deficiencies on process model comprehension
    Figl, Kathrin
    Mendling, Jan
    Strembeck, Mark
    Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 2013, 14 (06) : 312 - 338
  • [38] The Influence of Notational Deficiencies on Process Model Comprehension
    Figl, Kathrin
    Mendling, Jan
    Strembeck, Mark
    JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2013, 14 (06): : 312 - 338
  • [39] An Empirical Review of the Connection Between Model Viewer Characteristics and the Comprehension of Conceptual Process Models
    Jan Mendling
    Jan Recker
    Hajo A. Reijers
    Henrik Leopold
    Information Systems Frontiers, 2019, 21 : 1111 - 1135
  • [40] Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework
    Browning, Tyson R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2014, 32 (02) : 229 - 241