Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without blind maneuver

被引:1
|
作者
Okamura, Kikuo [1 ,3 ]
Hirabayashi, Tsuyoki [2 ]
Suzuki, Tomohide [2 ]
Koike, Mayumi [1 ]
Matsuura, Fumihiko [2 ]
Suzuki, Akitaka [2 ]
Yoshino, Yasushi [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Org Higashinagoya Hosp, Dept Urol, Nagoya, Japan
[2] Natl Hosp Org Nagoya Med Ctr, Nagoya, Japan
[3] Natl Hosp Org Higashinagoya Hosp, Dept Urol, 5-101,Umemorizaka,Meitou Ku, Nagoya 4658620, Japan
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; reconstructive surgery; surgical outcome; transvaginal mesh; FLOOR RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY; ANTERIOR COLPORRHAPHY; REPAIR; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jog.15538
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To present the techniques of transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse without the blind maneuver and elucidate its safety and efficacy.Methods: This retrospective study included 45 women with a mean age of 77.9 years old. We investigated surgical outcomes including complications, anatomical recurrence rates, and changes in both subjective symptoms and quality of life.Results: The surgery required 111 +/- 18 min and blood loss was 40 +/- 24 g. Minor injuries of the bladder and rectum occurred in two and one patient, respectively. The urethral catheter was removed on postoperative day 1.1 and patients were discharged on postoperative day 4.4. No one experienced voiding dysfunction requiring catheterization. Wound infections occurred in two patients but they subsided with only antibiotics administered. Five patients had anatomical recurrence during a median follow-up of 17 months. Of these, two underwent reoperation and the remaining three were solely followed-up because there were no or few associated problems. Chronic pain, mesh erosion, and exposure were absent in all cases. Subjective symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after surgery at 12 months postoperatively.Conclusion: It is considered that transvaginal mesh surgery without the blind maneuver is a safe and effective way to treat women with pelvic organ prolapse.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1042
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current Situation of Transvaginal Mesh Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Lan Zhu
    Lei Zhang
    Chinese Medical Sciences Journal, 2014, 29 (03) : 188 - 190
  • [22] Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    Xia, Mengting
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Wang, Jiaxi
    Mao, Peiyu
    Mei, Shanshan
    Wang, Xinyan
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 86 (05) : 978 - 987
  • [23] Transvaginal mesh implant for pelvic organ prolapse: Huaxi protocol
    Jie Zhang
    Deyi Luo
    Hong Shen
    Uroprecision, 2024, 2 (01) : 24 - 29
  • [24] Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Nir Haya
    Christopher Maher
    Current Obstetrics and Gynecology Reports, 2013, 2 (3) : 129 - 138
  • [25] Polypropylene Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Haya, Nir
    Maher, Christopher
    CURRENT OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY REPORTS, 2013, 2 (03): : 129 - 138
  • [26] MESH USAGE IN PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE SURGERY
    Ugurlucan, Funda Gungor
    Ilhan, Gulsah Keskin
    Akhan, Suleyman Engin
    Yalcin, Onay
    JOURNAL OF ISTANBUL FACULTY OF MEDICINE-ISTANBUL TIP FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2012, 75 (04): : 71 - 77
  • [27] Mesh use in surgery for pelvic organ prolapse
    Barber, Matthew D.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, 350
  • [28] The international discussion and the new regulations concerning transvaginal mesh implants in pelvic organ prolapse surgery
    Ng-Stollmann, Nathalie
    Fuenfgeld, Christian
    Gabriel, Boris
    Niesel, Achim
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 31 (10) : 1997 - 2002
  • [29] Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for recurrent pelvic organ prolapse after failed transvaginal polypropylene mesh surgery
    Schmid, Corina
    O'Rourke, Peter
    Maher, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2013, 24 (05) : 763 - 767
  • [30] Transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse—Prolift+M: a prospective clinical trial
    Salil Khandwala
    Chaandini Jayachandran
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2011, 22 : 1405 - 1411